|
By:
formoftheace 19 Aug 26 17:48 - Another good thread in tatters tbh,shameful…
Yes absolutely right, pathetic tbh. |
|
By:
Who ruined it
|
|
By:
Probably a fast race comsidering the ground, and Buick was too far back, considering the pace and the going - whether he could have been better positioned in the race is debateable but his effort was maybe a little too forced and petered out.
|
|
By:
Just had a lovely suppet in a nice italian washed down with a couple of glasses of nice wine back at rhe hotel looking over the river with a nice cognac thinking how lucky i am to be able to enjoy life.enjoy the rest of the great meeting guys and gals.
Ronnie. |
|
By:
Gagging 19 Aug 26 20:58
Probably a fast race comsidering the ground, and Buick was too far back, considering the pace and the going - whether he could have been better positioned in the race is debateable but his effort was maybe a little too forced and petered out. was level with winner 2f out..winner got hmp..still beat ombudsman 5L. |
|
By:
Is this the same Ombudsman that was "rock solid" to be in the 1st 3 at 2-11 frico??? You embarrassing clown. AGAIN slick tried to educate you by telling you you're wrong AGAIN. Give it up ydc. You're utterly clueless. Imagine all the bucks slick would have saved you if you weren't so stubborn. Next time you go "full bank" on a 1.06 or 1.16 wait for slicks advice. He hasn't been wrong yet. And you know it ydcc.
|
|
By:
Bubbles telling someone "to have a night off". No words necessary here.
|
|
By:
The only words needed are,post your claimed bets,Dickster
|
|
By:
Some obsession you have bubbles. Surely there's something else to occupy your time in Shakespeare country. How they let in someone from the Hackney marshes is hard to believe.
|
|
By:
People who make claimed bets on here should be able to show them as most do.
Even shy and retiring posters like you and Delbert,the bullshatters. However,all they do is try to deflect away from their ridiculous claims with insults ![]() |
|
By:
it was 'rock solid' on g/f..wasnt 'rock solid' g/s
my p&l is 'rock solid' dicksters p&l is non existant. capiche? LOL |
|
By:
Amazing how slick STILL got it right frico. You shouldn't have opened your trap 6 hours pre race if you were unsure n'est pas.
Fricos drone 3.8. Frico on his own steam down half a million bucks. Pretty obvious to me. Capiche. Give it up. You're a beaten docket sonny Jim. |
|
By:
slickster 19 Aug 26 12:58
2.25 gentle hurricane 1pt 3.00 pierre bonnard 2pts 3.35 Constitution river 2pts 5.20 ruler's pride 1pt Thanks George. ![]() |
|
By:
CagliariG • August 18, 2026 8:12 PM BST
So which one is it Delashay? You stated CR has a similar run style to Calandagan "If he can keep tabs when Ombudsman goes then he might be worn down" Which horse might be worn down, just to avoid confusion? In addition you agreed with Mick that Ombudsman has superior acceleration which muddies the water somewhat but not unusual for you? As far as the race itself any one of the top 4 in the betting could win but Almaqam only if the going eased considerably, Item has to step up on form to date and not impossible he could. That said Constitution River is as entitled to progress similarly and already has the superior form and given the ratings should beat him. The big question for me is has Ombudsman got any more improvement at the age of 5 or will he have enough in hand to beat CR anyway? They should almost dead heat if they ran to their rating at the weights, if that is the case then the potential progression is more likely to come from CR and imo that would give him the edge. Likely to be tuned to the minute and hard not to ignore his jockeys comment post Sandown given he rarely eulogises like that unlike the trainer. I hate to abandon Ombudsman in favour of AOB but when it comes to punting, no room for affection. There you go Delashay!! - - - - Unlucky “Two Bites!” ![]() |
|
By:
First four home Delashay and CR beat your "Superior" acceleration Ombudsman did he not? lol
|
|
By:
tobymug & dellawoffler
Walter Mitty & billy Liar. |
|
By:
1.18 failure adds to Baaeed et al!! LOL
|
|
By:
2 losers in 20yrs..not too bad tobyliargarymugs..
|
|
By:
The other 20 odd slip your mind? 1.06, 1.06, 1.06 etc etc but tbf the winners @ 40/1 and 150/1, sorry forgot you laid the winners.
|
|
By:
Hugo's conveniently forgotten about the Derek-Thompson-inspired Metal Detector debacle
LOL |
|
By:
without the loosers and metal detector rico would be approx..+£4,000,000..
|
|
By:
Delashay • August 18, 2026 8:39 PM BST
I don’t like the form of the POW …. ![]() |
|
By:
auschwitz?
|