Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 278 comments are related to the topic:
Epsom crowd

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 278
By:
jimnast
When: 11 Jun 25 12:41
I wonder if jcr have considered the dramatic fall in attendance has coincided with cashless racecourses
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 12:54
Good point jimnast,100% of the fodder like to play with the readies on course….
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 12:56
Entry bleep….

Coffee bleep…

Food bleep….

Beer bleep….

Ffs….
By:
impossible123
When: 11 Jun 25 13:00
That's a good point. I'd not want the bank to know I chose to go overdrawn for horseracing as I'd find it difficult even embarrass when face-to-face with a bank staff if asking for a loan.

I've been thinking of going horseracing again. I'd drive or I'd use public transport some bits of the journey are free as I've a Freedom Pass. I think it would cost at least £50 to attend eg entrance fee; car park; petrol, about the same if using public transport eg entrance fee; train fare;a taxi. All these are before refreshment and placing a bet.
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 13:05
Keep cash in the biscuit tin for going racing…a withdrawal from the atm now and again fills the tin…..if you have a good day punting it goes back in the tin…..

Tell the bank f all….
By:
Hayden
When: 11 Jun 25 13:20
If anyone needs a biscuit tin they're available at £5.99 from Amazon.

Thanks Ace   Happy
By:
jimnast
When: 11 Jun 25 13:21
Simple as that form good advice

I see young people not only spending on the card at the races but also betting on it they don’t realise come the day they need to borrow or get a mortgage this behaviour will affect them
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 13:54
Sitting with the bank applying for a mortgage jimnast with the person flicking through the account looking at list of bookmakers would fly any red flag tbh…
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 13:55
Hayden 11 Jun 25 13:20 
If anyone needs a biscuit tin they're available at £5.99 from Amazon.

Thanks Ace   Happy

Best way Hayden,the less they know….
By:
stu
When: 11 Jun 25 13:58
Indeed - the new world order is now to allow all forms of 'snooping and prying and judging' about what we do, or do not.

Ironically, we also get bashed over the head about keeping data 'private' with GDPR regulations all around the place.

But if you are given the right to snoop and judge then there are literally no limits to what someone can poke at and comment on....
By:
1st time poster
When: 11 Jun 25 14:07
and if race tracks are casheless whats the point in a biscuit tin full of money, do they accept the TIN as a deposit,if so how many tins do you neded for the day ?
By:
jimnast
When: 11 Jun 25 14:09
Just go to the tracks that are not cashless
By:
Delashay
When: 11 Jun 25 14:32

Jun 10, 2025 -- 7:48PM, Andrew-In-Sweden wrote:


The bookies are killing horseracing by not taking bets from recreational punters resulting in an ever-decreasing Levy contributionYou appear to have a disturbing resentment against UK bookmakers, not only based on the post above, but many others, possibly due to past losses perhaps. Far be it from me to act as a mediator, but you may be surprised to know that although turn-over is down and expected to decrease again, the bookmaker levy paid in March 2025 was £108 million, the highest figure since reform in 2017 and the 4th increase in a row.Levy payments 2023/24 £105m - 2022/23 £100m - 2021/22 £97m - 2020/21 £83mThe levy is based on bookmaker gross profit, not turn-over.


Andrew he has a point if he dislikes them. Whether it’s down to losses or not, it isn’t the point.

The SJP has been priced up and I see more and more of these place terms being offered. Imagine that you are a new comer to racing and you read the rules of placing a bet, then go to so and see this:

From Billy Lills


EW: 1/4 Odds 2 Places



No.    Selection

Field Of Gold.       
Ruling Court.       
Henri Matisse
Shadow Of Light
Jonquil
Opera Ballo
Rashabar
Scorthy Champ
Officer
Windlord
First Wave

11 runners listed only 2 places paid EW

And their guide to Each Way betting!

Understanding each-way betting
At William Hill, we offer Extra Places on selected races every day, while you can place each-way bets on your pick at any time by ticking the box in the betslip.

It's crucial to understand the place terms when you place an each-way bet, so here are the number of places paid depending on the numbers of runners in the race:

- Less than five runners = win-only market
- Five to seven runners = two places
- Eight to 15 runners = three places
- Handicaps of 16 or more runners = four places

From their website.

Do not put up a market if you don’t offer the terms stated!

Yes the race will likely cut up, but to the average person this goes against the rules and you’d think what do they know that I don’t. It smells off and this sort of thing will not attract new people to the sport.
Unless people talk up about this such stuff on the TV then it will get worse. 1/4 odds for Goup 1’s to 1/5 for example.

By:
elisjohn
When: 11 Jun 25 14:40
11 runners listed and paying first 2,     and what happens if you back the 3rd and actually 8 do run .?
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Jun 25 14:41
then you've done your money
By:
Brian
When: 11 Jun 25 14:42
I think there are many in the racing establishment that agree with W C Fields "Never give a sucker an even break"
By:
Hayden
When: 11 Jun 25 14:49
That example Delashay is infinitely more to do with hardened punters than newcomers tbf and it's not like for like , compares to a tadpole in an ocean to find any newcomer remotely interested in all that so not relevant in the context of the thread.

As for the example itself of course it looks poor but any hardened gambler that would feasibly go near that AND want an e/way bet is again minimal at best , if you were a bookmaker i'd suggest you'd be extremely wary in offering 3 places in that race when you consider how many will make post time , sometimes you have to look at things from both sides.

I could say anyone playing ante post these days deserves what they get but that would be a digression.


Good luck today   Happy
By:
saxon farm
When: 11 Jun 25 15:49
Hayden

An excellent post above.
By:
Delashay
When: 11 Jun 25 16:01
Same to you Hayden and it has some relevance with how the sport looks, poor isn’t good enough. Concessions have to be made both sides.

Imagine I say to a pal go back this each way in this race as they pay three places. They watch the race see it comes 3rd,go to collect and get nothing. They won’t be encouraged to have another bet.
What’s worse is, the people in the shop wouldn’t be able to explain the reason why the above doesn’t all tally up.
Of course a hardened punter will go elsewhere but there are lots of shops on the high street and you can’t control what a friend given a tip will do.

All the talk of brining the race back to Wednesday is pointless. The race isn’t seen the same by this generation as most of you remember.
They need to make it (racing) a package for all types and affordable. More prizes and competitions with give aways. Most people I know associate racing with dirty looking old men and they aren’t my words!
More competition with horses will help, racing has become a tad boring with certain trainers mopping up everything, not everyone wants to back a short priced favourite.
The image in general needs cleaning, jockeys being given short term bans for positive drug tests only happens in this sport.
It’s not just the Derby that this’ll help, but racing in general. If it’s cleaned up more companies might want to attend race days and give the goers something else to see.

As we’re quoting,

“…Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is rapidly agin'
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'…”

The sport and people need to move with the times and adapt. As a species we’re quite good at that.
By:
Delashay
When: 11 Jun 25 16:08
And the result of this years Derby wouldn’t encourage anyone to go, if they knew the narrative of flip flopping favs from the same yard, both gambled on, pushed out and then shortened. Then not even looking competitive in the race itself.

Thats a hard thing to sell anyone.

Anti post or even on the day, the money came for Delacroix the Fav and a feeble excuse was given for his non effort.
But when you’ve seen it all before as with in the Guineas, it becomes normal, that’s not good or acceptable.
By:
Hayden
When: 11 Jun 25 16:22
Just received a mail that makes betting an irrelevance ......

Dear winner

I am Mr. Richard Wahl, the mega winner of $533M USD in Mega Millions Jackpot, I'm donating to 5 random individuals. If you receive my email then your email was selected after a spin ball. I have spread most of my wealth over a number of charities and organizations. I have voluntarily decided to donate the sum of $4,300,000.00 USD to you as you are one of the selected 5, to verify my winnings please see the youtube page below.


So anyone devoid of cash just give me a bell   Happy
By:
impossible123
When: 11 Jun 25 16:30
"11 runners and only 2 places paid E?W"

That would mean the bookie is expecting at least 3 non-runners = 3 non-refundable antepost stakes = pure profit. Is this not sharp practice?
By:
saxon farm
When: 11 Jun 25 16:40
^
No it’s not.
By:
Delashay
When: 11 Jun 25 16:44

Jun 11, 2025 -- 4:30PM, impossible123 wrote:


"11 runners and only 2 places paid E?W"That would mean the bookie is expecting at least 3 non-runners = 3 non-refundable antepost stakes = pure profit. Is this not sharp practice?


It’s wrong whatever you call it. But there’s lots of bookies on here so bound to not agree impossible.

Just talk biscuits and you’ll be alright!

By:
impossible123
When: 11 Jun 25 16:54
Bookies or wannabe bookies or bookies masquerading as naive punters with inside info to snare recreational punters on as yet publicly unknown non-runner or an injured horse.

Insider-dealing could carry a custodial sentence in the City Of London, but not in horseracing. Here it's kudos.
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 17:05
I can see the sockless flashing the card to bet tbh….doubt many of them will carry the readies….
By:
Stringvest
When: 11 Jun 25 17:07
I recently went Sandown , Cards only at the Bar , Cash with Books and Tote
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 17:09
I couldn’t imagine going racing without cash tbh…
By:
swiftynifty
When: 11 Jun 25 17:13
acey, you can't get in with cash, you can't eat or drink with cash at lots of tracks. Don't forget your card.
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 17:15
Oh the card is in the wallet swifty…..ping for coffees….

Cash in the pocket…..
By:
swiftynifty
When: 11 Jun 25 17:19
The whole point of a day's gambling at the races is cash. You get a nice win and are told that should be in your account in 5 working days.
By:
impossible123
When: 11 Jun 25 17:22
'Delayshay', I've just seen 'Andrew's' post. I think I've binned the poster before. Maybe he's using a slightly different moniker now. And, the assumption my post or hatred for bookies was based on losses prior was condescending, probably arrogant and insecurity all rolled into one. Maybe 'Andrew' has not heard of the saying "act ignorant and stupid, play the opposition at their own game to win".

The horseracing turnover may be down, but the Levy is up; Levy is based on gross profit. Little doubt the gross profit was boosted by an increase in profit in fobt.

Anyone can see the bookies are running horseracing to suit themselves hence the present spiral decline. The bookies' smokescreen has hoodwinked even the supposedly well-versed posters here. Or disingenuity at its worst.
By:
swiftynifty
When: 11 Jun 25 17:24
levy only paid on gross profits from horse racing bets. that's the problem
By:
jimnast
When: 11 Jun 25 17:27
Swifty

Racecourse bookmakers are ONLY allowed to pay out in cash regardless of how the bet was placed.


And would NOT be allowed to pay 1st 2 on 8 plus runners
By:
impossible123
When: 11 Jun 25 17:27
What'd happen you splashed out, and you won. But, the winning is not in your account yet. In the meantime there's insufficient fund in one's account for another proper bet.

What'd happen next? Go home, or kick up a storm?
By:
jimnast
When: 11 Jun 25 17:28
Impossible

You’ve binned Andrew what does that mean ?
By:
swiftynifty
When: 11 Jun 25 17:28
jimnast, I didn't know that, sounds like the way it should be though.
By:
formoftheace
When: 11 Jun 25 17:28
swiftynifty 11 Jun 25 17:19 
The whole point of a day's gambling at the races is cash. You get a nice win and are told that should be in your account in 5 working days.

I find the thought of that unbearable swifty tbh…..unimaginable pain….
By:
jimnast
When: 11 Jun 25 17:31
Agreed swifty
By:
impossible123
When: 11 Jun 25 17:32
If I understand correctly there will come a point where the Levy can only go progressively less and less if the Levy is based on the gross profit of horseracing, and betting in horseracing is on the downhill spiral. Now, I'm betting at least 80% less than just 5 years ago; 40% since last year.
Page 5 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com