There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 251 comments are related to the topic:
Enable 4-5...I am laying for plenty anybody else?
Enable 4-5...I am laying for plenty anybody else?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 251
|
By:
Thanks elise
|
|
By:
Money for Enable (1.71) and Magical (15) with Japan (8.8) and Sottsass (10) on the drift.
|
|
By:
Brilliant mare and Frankie has ridden some very good horse. When he says she's the best he has ridden it's difficult to argue with him.
The owner isn't greedy as one post mentions above that's an insult to a great man who keeps his classic winners in training unlike many owners. Hope she wins easily and the trainer especially good with Fiilies and Mares. |
|
By:
One race too many imo ..... plus she goes on soft but maybe not the brutal soft it might be today ...... I think her finishing position will be 5th ...... good luck whatever you do ....
 |
|
By:
ive started laying at 1.69
|
|
By:
three older horses have been fav in the last 5 years
treve unplaced postponed unplaced orfevre 2nd fav an e/w lay for me |
|
By:
Layed at 1.7.
|
|
By:
With Enable having a high draw will that be such a disadvantage with a smaller field ?
|
|
By:
i can't see it being the deciding factor, dettori rides Longchamp better than many of the French jocks
|
|
By:
Is it fair to say that she has yet to meet a really good horse?
Trouble is maybe the same thing again today, JAPAN ew strikes me as good value @ 15/2. |
|
By:
id like to see her win, gosden is a genius
if there's a shock maybe it's one of the japanese horses, a lot of their form is on quicker going but they are being overlooked in the market and the prices are much too big, they are all pushing 200-1, one might get in the frame or go close, kiseki with soumi up perhaps, lamaire on fierement i know 9/10 it goes to the top of the market but given conditions and question marks on a few runners i'll play them |
|
By:
Looks like the ground will be bordering on heavy and that makes me even more confident that Enable could be in trouble,yeah she might sail through it but I am more than happy to have the rest of the field running for me.
|
|
By:
i was thinking 1.8 pre race might come
|
|
By:
I will continue meditating until evens arrives close to post time.
If it doesn’t I will cheer on this true great in expectation of her getting the job done. Again. |
|
By:
Magical being backed a bit now at 9s and 10s
|
|
By:
be amazed if evens comes, frankies up so pmu will be in line but hope your meditating does the trick
|
|
By:
Enable to win is 1.71, and not to win is 2.36 - could someone explain please? I cannot comprehend the point of 'laying' Enable (to lose) at 1.71, and why not back Enable not to win instead at 2.36 - could someone explain please? Maybe it's too early, and it's a sunday.
|
|
By:
down to the amounts available impossible123
|
|
By:
weary 06 Oct 19 10:17
Is it fair to say that she has yet to meet a really good horse? typical reply from a clueless,potless clown. |
|
By:
WILLY.....which horse do you believe to be really top class?
regards cpc. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
enable.
|
|
By:
just watching the markets and significant money has come in france, that 1.73 current'y looks like bail out money to me, i will maybe go in later
|
|
By:
dry or lubed up?
|
|
By:
ill lay again at lower, it's currently shorter on pmu than on here having dropped from 2.1 since 10am
|
|
By:
I don't need lube I'm well oiled
|
|
By:
To say she's not come up against another top horse yet?
So the two last Arc's had no top horse in them. King George, Oaks, Eclipse? That has to be a wind up right? Regardless win or lose today. To say she's notmet a top horse is plain daft sorry. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
impossible123
06 Oct 19 11:42 Joined: 07 Sep 15 | Topic/replies: 12,382 | Blogger: impossible123's blog Enable to win is 1.71, and not to win is 2.36 - could someone explain please? I cannot comprehend the point of 'laying' Enable (to lose) at 1.71, and why not back Enable not to win instead at 2.36 - could someone explain please? Maybe it's too early, and it's a sunday. jaysus you really are the dumbest idiot to ever grace this forum. I would bet money you are/were a civil servant. |
|
By:
in the last 49 years of arc winners , i wouldnt have enable in the top 35. Ilike enable it just she running against poor horses and imo its been a very poor era since2000s with the exception of few horses
|
|
By:
Come on lads keep this thread friendly.
 |
|
By:
It's all your fault, acey.
 |
|
By:
You cannot be serious elisjohn she can only beat what is around....Give her some respect man.
|
|
By:
She's a very good horse, in my opinion no Treve or Dancing Brave for sure. Also, very well managed and race-planned by Gosden. Nevertheless, I hope she wins - she's the best of the older generation.
|
|
By:
apologies ACEY :)
just wondering why would anyone back heads at 1/1 when they can lay tails at evens |
|
By:
No problem Charlton.
|
|
By:
Enable a different type to Treve or Dancing Brave who were speed horses at the trip. DB's best trip was certainly 10/11f. Enable a real stayer. 14f+ would be no problem. A Sun Princess type..but better.
|
|
By:
lay enable £100 at 1.71, she wins lost £71 , she loses wins £100 . YOUR stake is £71
back enable to lose £71 at 2.36 , she wins lost £71 , , she loses wins approx £97 . YOUR stake is £71. i sometimes get confused especially with say rugby hcaps  impossible123 • October 6, 2019 11:42 AM BST Enable to win is 1.71, and not to win is 2.36 - could someone explain please? I cannot comprehend the point of 'laying' Enable (to lose) at 1.71, and why not back Enable not to win instead at 2.36 - could someone explain please? Maybe it's too early, and it's a sunday. |
|
By:
 |