|
By:
ok 28 you old fart lol - i was being.....wots that big word -glad to see you standing up against these clowns by the way
|
|
By:
More hated in Germany than Hitler imo.
|
|
By:
agreed .......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4BCUWopQQ4 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Awfully swift to jump to conclusions Smiley Jack. Your mind is as closed as your heroine's was.
|
|
By:
hey smiley -im a millionaire 2 times over and i bathe in vodka every night -golden duck i may add -lets party cos im golden goosed
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
stop teasing him salmon hes mine and youtubes
|
|
By:
ok i own a wife whos worth 6 million and a=-ive got two divorces on the go at 2 million a piece -calm down betfair i dont want a free £20 bingo credit lol
|
|
By:
we import 56 million tonnes of coal per year whilst we stand on a thousand years of coal production in our own country -you do the the meths-of course it wasnt personal ffs
If it makes so much sense then, why didn't private industry pick this up and run it? I think you need to do the maths |
|
By:
If some of the responses on here represent a cross section of the cretins Maggie defeated then thank goodness she did defeat them. There is absolutely no place on this earth, maybe North Korea, where their doctrine and beliefs will ever or should ever be successful. In fact reading through their nasty, self righteous, ignorant comments there is no place on this forum for them either.
You lost, thank goodness and good riddance. |
|
By:
Here is an interesting fact for the maggie-bashers: more coal mines were closed under Harold Wilson than under Maggie Thatcher.
|
|
By:
I thought Maggie was right and Scargill was wrong. He took the miners out on strike without a ballot and they mindlessly followed him.
The massive difference between me and the Maggie bashers on here is that I don't hold it against Scargill and nor would I ever think or suggest dancing on his grave. He stood by his beliefs and fought for power over the country. Thankfully he was defeated but I don't hate him for it even though he never once apologised for screwing up the lives and livelihoods of so many of his followers and their communities. |
|
By:
Neil Kinnock, quoted in The Guardian: "The issue (was) the suicidal vanity of Arthur Scargill, which is why his leadership was such a gift to Margaret Thatcher. ... I don't re-write history at all when I say such was the domination and the exploitation of solidarity … that there is one person who stands accused of walking straight into the carefully laid trap of Margaret Thatcher with a high speed and lack of restraint that in her wildest dreams she could not have hoped for. ... The strike was ruined the minute it was politicised and in the mind of Arthur Scargill it was always a political struggle … He fed himself the political illusion that as long as the miners were united they had the right to destabilise and overthrow the democratically elected government."
|
|
By:
This started long before Thatcher. Wilson couldn't do anything and neither could Callaghan. There was no way the path to ruin the unions had put this country on could be continued with. And there is no country in the world that demonstrates their values and ideas were right. That says everything so Maggie had the fight and defeat them for the sake of everyone else in the country not just the unions and their followers/members.
|
|
By:
brigust1 10 Apr 13 09:15 Joined: 07 Dec 01 | Topic/replies: 5,682 | Blogger: brigust1's blog
If some of the responses on here represent a cross section of the cretins Maggie defeated then thank goodness she did defeat them. There is absolutely no place on this earth, maybe North Korea, where their doctrine and beliefs will ever or should ever be successful. In fact reading through their nasty, self righteous, ignorant comments there is no place on this forum for them either. You lost, thank goodness and good riddance. .................................................................................................................................. North Korea? They're about as right wing as Maggie, ffs. That remark demonstrates just how politically ignorant you are, brigust.As for self righteous, no one was more so thatn the evil bitch herself. |
|
By:
Reged 10 Apr 13 09:18 Joined: 22 Aug 01 | Topic/replies: 11,707 | Blogger: Reged's blog
Here is an interesting fact for the maggie-bashers: more coal mines were closed under Harold Wilson than under Maggie Thatcher. .................................................... Extremely disingenuous. How many pits were there when Thatcher came to power, and how many are there now? |
|
By:
You lost Alias and thank goodness for that if you are a typical cross example. No-one would want you or your kind running or having any say in the future of this country.
|
|
By:
Alias - get your facts right.
There were MORE pits closed under Labour Governments than there were under the Conservatives. |
|
By:
That Alist is down to economic reality ... not Thatcher. The mines were unprofitable. They were in Europe too, where they were also run down. Why should the taxpayer cough up to keep miners in jobs?
|
|
By:
You don't see the North Korea connection? Mindless followers striking themselves into extinction? You don't see it? Clueless.
|
|
By:
It's the same with a lot of things -milk for instance. Thatcher is demonised as the milk-snatcher but the policy was actually started under Harold Wilson when it was taken away from secondary schools.
|
|
By:
I lost? Explain please brigust.
No, I merely sympathise with those who were flung out of work for no good reason, or otherwise battered by the fascist bitch. You do understand sympathy, don't you? Social conscience? Or is there no such thing as society? You really are without a clue, aren't you? |
|
By:
'Flung out of work for no good reason'? If I remember correctly they walked out. They used pickets, flying pickets, intimidation, bullying, threats on their own family members and fellow workers not to mention anyone who got in their way. Social conscience? Are you sure. There are still families in the pit villages who hate each other where is their social conscience? And that is way before the effect their actions were having on everyone else in the country is taken into consideration. Hospitals blacked out, homes blacked out, businesses blacked, bodies not buried, rubbish mountains. ALL THE ACTIONS OF THE UNIONS AND THEIR MEMBERS IRRESPECTIVE OF WHAT EFFECT IT HAD ON THE REST OF THE COUNTRY. Where is their social coscience?
|
|
By:
No, I merely sympathise with those who were flung out of work for no good reason, or otherwise battered by the fascist bitch. You do understand sympathy, don't you? Social conscience? Or is there no such thing as society?
I can sort of understand state subsidy of an energy source and to keep people in work ie society etc until it becomes completely uneconomical. But as a taxpayer being then held to ransom, being asked for more or the lights go out I tend to lose my sympathy. Symbolic of the union led culture at the time - the workers were simply pawns and need to look at the political union leaders who led them off a cliff ( well actually they led them nowhere cos they made sure they looked after themselves.) |
|
By:
And this wasn't the first time. They already had a long, long history of it. The country could not take any more. They had to be stopped. Raging inflation, high taxes we were known as the sick man of Europe. Don't talk to me about social conscience they hadn't and many still don't have, when you hear their comments today.
|
|
By:
To listen you you brigust, and your fellow fascists, you'd think that TU members were some kind of fifth column or foreign enemy. In truth, trade unionists were and are the working people of this country, without whom you'd have very few rights today, and without whom you'd never have won wars. Thatcher called TUs "the enemy within", and yet all of the famous traitors have been public school and Cambridge boys. TU members are your countrymen, not your enemies, only Thatcher and her kind have convinced you differently. The same Thatcher who CONGRATULATED Pinochet on his government of Chile - Pinochet, our "friend" according to Thatcher, who like so many fascist dictators, led a military coup to usurp a democratically elected government, and then proceeded to murder anyone who was left of him. In the right time, Thatcher would no doubt have congratulated Mussolini, Franco and Hitler, and all of the other murdering fascist tyrants from the same mould.
Are you happy to think of Pinochet as your friend? How does it sit with you, knowing your heroine sucked up to fascist murderers? |
|
By:
brigust knows Thatcher agreed with him about Brigadier Gerard and Frankel. At the end of the day that's all that matters.
|
|
By:
In spite of the warmongering and jingoism, workers' struggles actually intensified during the Second World War. Tony Dabb reveals how rising class struggle saw workers form a different sort of unity against the profiteering of the bosses
Wartime quotas put pressure on miners 'Here we were, just about winning the war, and losing our trade union rights. So what the bloody hell had we been fighting for?' With these words, one socialist summed up the bitterness and resentment felt by workers in Britain towards the end of the Second World War. The sacrifices they were asked to make in the 'national interest' increasingly entailed poor pay, intolerable conditions, and the infringement of their basic right to organise at work. There was widespread determination to defeat Hitler's Nazis, but the war also created tensions which raised questions in the minds of many about its real purpose. It was apparent that bosses were reaping huge profits off the back of the war effort. For the rest of society, long hours, inadequate air raid provision and meagre rations were their only reward, and the future promised little improvement. As the war went on, ordinary working people became more and more unwilling to tolerate this unequal sacrifice, and they expressed their anger at it where they had the greatest means of making themselves heard--in the workplace. ............................................................................................................ Yeah, what a bunch of selfish bast@rds those trade unionists were, eh? http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/sr185/dabb.htm Thatcher's onslaught against workers' rights is one big reason why so many people today are trapped in £6.50 an hour jobs. Everybody can't be a banker/lawyer/accountant or whatever. Are you proud of that "achievement" brigust and co? |
|
By:
Using the war as an example is laughable. Yes at that stage what the union movement stood for was absolutely fair and equitable.
But what it had turned into wasn't the same. It was politicised and in Thatcher's time we are in fact talking about 35 years later. Unions felt they could do and demand what they wanted. As a small example in the cargo shed at BA they had a set number of people who worked the night shift. It was a known 'perk' of the job that half the shift worked whilst the other half slept until they swapped midway through the shift. Guess what would have happened if management intervened? I believe it was fairly similar in the print industry as well. So are you saying that should have been accepted? |
|
By:
when labour were in charge in the early 70,s and the unions were calling the shots and holding everyone to ransom with power cuts and denial of council services why do you think the torys were voted in ?
the labour party itself could not deal with the unions ffs . All the stuff about the community charge being unfair is complete myth imo . the principle that those that access council services the most pay the most is a fair one rather than those that have the biggest house pay the most ,a single person in a big house would likely use less serviceS than a family of five in a council flat ....what was wrong with the communty charge ? selling off the council houses was the best thing thatcher done along with a free market economy . trying to blame thatcher for the state the country is in now is laughable. and if its is a blame game look no further than Blair and co. lack of investment in anything by successive governments is the problem we are where we are ,or do people honestly believe we should still all be burning coal for heating and in power stations ? OR we could have had a car manufacturing industry,ECT ECT plenty playing the blame game and rejoicing after a 87 yearold women has died of a stroke but not many offering any solutions for the future . pretty sad and shows the mental state of many in this country . ordinary rights and freedoms have been eroded more under the last labour gov then any tory one ,MT increased choice and freedoms labour done the opposite .....wake up and smell the coffee. |
|
By:
alias, you´re wasting your time on brigust, he doesn´t care about facts. If he talks shiite and you prove that he´s talking shiite he just conveniently ignores it and comes back with another sweeping biased statement with little or no evidence other than what he´s read in the Daily Mail to support it. He believes what he wants to believe and sees only what he wants to see inside the little bubble of his own experience. You cannot discuss with people like that. They cannot change their thinking or even compromise on one point, for fear of waking up and finding maybe they´ve been wrong about all.
|
|
By:
They cannot change their thinking or even compromise on one point, for fear of waking up and finding maybe they´ve been wrong about all.
Thats true and it applies to both sides of the debate Good post bread and butter.Agree entirely |
|
By:
I think you should just open your eyes Tip and try not to tell others to do what you cannot yourself. Anyone who believes Thatcher is responsible for all the ills of this country are living in a bubble. But, like the others, you only know how to talk rubbish and add no details. I do read the facts and I do know Thatcher wasn't always right but in taking on the unions at that time she was. You, in your blinkered view, cannot see that the unions at that time were wrong. And I was a union member ffs. The miners union, without a ballot I may add, had 2 choices think about the country or think about themselves. They chose themselves and lost. And now, like some of the sour punters on here, everyone else is wrong but themselves.
I've never bought the Daily Mail in my lfe but I did live through those times and my family, like many many others, were on the receiving of the damage the unions did to this country. They have no sympathy for the miners and, in reality, the NUM did far more damage to the unions cause than any government could ever have done. The difference is we aren't dancing on anyone's grave that only shows the mentality of some of the posters on here. And you Tip, are one of those. |
|
By:
brigust, don´t confuse me with some of the other people you´ve been talking to.
I have not once said that ALL Britain´s problems today were caused by Thatcher. You raised a comparison between the UK and Germany and I pointed out that the reason Germany is doing so well and the British economy is in dire straits is because of economic mismanagement by successive governments from 1979 to now. But it was Thatcher who first took the UK down the road of free market Milton Friedman economics, and which Major, Blair, Brown and Cameron have followed. You were the one who claimed that the reason Germany is doing so well is because the were fortunate to have 17m workers coming from the east and as a result have had a low cost economy. I explained, with facts and figures, that this was laughable. YOU just ignored the fact you were completely wrong. So don´t accuse me of ´adding no details´ when you make such foolish assertions based purely on your opinion, and ignore the evidence when it suits you. I was also a union member in 1979, in the public sector, and I accept absolutely that there were excesses by the unions. But the way to move forward, then and now, was to bring all parties round the table. The role of government is not, and should never be, to use the power of the state to destroy any group of workers and their communities because of ideology. The role of a PM is to unite the nation not the reverse. And I have already said (if you read my posts) that it brought me no pleasure or sadness to hear about Thatcher´s death. Since 1990 she was a political irrelevance. I hated her when she was in power and if she had died 30 years ago I would have celebrated, but the passing of any 87-y-o geriatric does not make me happy. I didn´t hear you complaining about all the right-wingers who were ´dancing on the grave ´of Hugo Chavez after he died, and he was a popular leader who never harmed one person in this country. Why don´t you start offering up some ´details´, facts and figures to back up your opinions and anecdotes? |
|
By:
She made decisions that impacted on those with little or no choice they did not impact on her or her cronies she used the power and money of the state to defeat the miners she was no different from Scargill the use and abuse of power for their own ends,she gave no whit for the communities that she decimated ffs it,s peoples lives we are talking here,was she not elected to lead the whole of the country,she privatised the utilities with the blockbusting lie that competition would see prices kept at a minimum so she LIED to the country,it is indicative to me that those who supported her and glorify her will be to a man selfish and self seeking with no thought for others that is until there is a war then they all want the downtrodden to go and fight for freedom and a better life.
|
|
By:
I do have a child wildmanloony, last thing they were learning in history lessons was 1066. I don't know what planet you are living on seriously.
|
|
By:
Totally agree with you tiptheodds,"power is a greater corrupter than money" this is very true,Thatcher/Scargill/Blair and all those before and since need a huge dose of humility they have an awsome amount of power ut is how you use it not one of them ever seem to use it for the long term benefit of all the country,down thro history placing this amount of power into one persons hands is tantamount to decimation for whole swathes of the populace it just goes on and on,this is why I can,t see our form of democracy ever solve the problems,Germany of the bigger nations seem to be the nearest to getting it right,of the smaller nations the Scandanavians seem to manage it well but we are far and away one of the worst of the developed countries.
|
|
By:
Tip the report on Germany was not mine it was in a documentary on the television. West Germany were worried about the effect workers from the East would have on wages and were certain to drive them down. You don't have to be an economist or mathematician to work that one out. Your point about average wages I dealt with because these statistics spread over a country are completely meaningless. Ask the people in Wales what the average wage means to them. Any fool can come up with pointless statistics then make out they know something when in actual fact they know eff all.
If, as you say, you were a union member in the late 70's then you should know quite clearly the demands upin the government by the NUM et al were not realistic. You must have known the taxes pai and the rate of inflation. You must have known for a governmnt to surrender to these tactics would have been suicidal as it was for Wilson and Callaghan. If you want to know some facts and figures you should read my posts. They were actually factual because I was working in a car factory around this period. So why don't you get your facts right before open your mouth? You, if you were a trade unionist at the time, should know better. |
|
By:
They were actually factual because I was working in a car factory around this period
Really ? That must be the first time you've mentioned it. |
|
By:
^^That wasn't pointed at you WTF. I was answering a point put forward to me by Tiptheodds. But at least you confirmed, should Tip want confirmation, that I had put that point forward.
|