|
By:
Its not illegal and that is the great shame.
I would tax them out of existence, most bandits end up in jail perhaps it would be far healthier if these machines were to be viewed in the same way. |
|
By:
leave them in the shops keeps all the idiots in one place...................
|
|
By:
11KV
22 Mar 12 13:18 Joined: 21 Jan 06 | Topic/replies: 8,045 | Blogger: 11KV's blog leave them in the shops keeps all the idiots in one place.. spot on there the streets of north london are a much safer place to be when its day release and there all in a 20 person scrum around each machine. come on baldy and no power you have now both been granted a licence to operate till midnight now apply for 24 hour opening in the suburbs it will be heaven as they wont have to leave the shops |
|
By:
The reality of machines are they take your money so quickly and unlike a win on the horses etc,etc, you have absolutely no chance of a life changing win.
They are an addiction for a greater proportion of the gambling community and while nobody minds anyone losing their own money the addicted rarely do lose their own, its starts off that way, then its your mums or sisters or the next doors neighbors and then its burglary and even worse. Then Society pays for the courts, the prisons, the probation services the list is endless and then its quite usual for the victim of compulsive gambling never to have a proper job again. A weeks wages can go in one machine in a couple of hours. Are they a good recreation ????? |
|
By:
Lads and billys will soon be in talks to stock cigarettes , alchohol and syringes for the discerning punter who wants it all .
|
|
By:
Thats right Moondan.I remember reading that research shows 50% of all crime in England is due to drug addiction and far higher in the poor inner cities.Just as a drug addicts will turn to crime to feed their habit so will a lot of these tens of thousands of new gambling addicts being created by these FOBTs.Spreading even more misery to some of poorest people in the country.
Another big problem with these FOBTs is the way they suck up so much of poor peoples spending money.So where before most would have had a bet lost what they could afford and then say go to the pub with his mates or taken his family for a meal.Now so many lose nearly all their spare money on these evil things,that they have no money to spend elsewhere.They are one of the reasons why so many pubs are closing and so many high streets are dying.People can only spend their money once and when these tens of millions are lost on the FOBTs,every other business that was previously getting some of this money is suffering or going bust.So any jobs they create,i bet a lot more are lost in more labour intensive(and decent)businesses. |
|
By:
toronto44 I know we don't see eye to eye on many things but even by your standards blaming machines for teh closure of pubs is a corker!
Of course the availability of cheap supermarket alcohol and the smoking ban made no difference. |
|
By:
Banks a rare spelling mistake bon viveur !! Of course pubs are closing down for many reasons, heh, I like a bottle of cut price Claret as much as the next man.However those potential pub regulars have actually left their houses and are out and about.Even the uneducated can see if that they passed a Betting Shop they would still have cash for a pint.If they have done their conkers on the FOBTs then they can only return home or turn to crime !!
|
|
By:
Or go to the local rough boozer where they can borrow a ton at 50% rates until payday.
|
|
By:
Banks if you read my post correctly i said....ONE OF THE REASONS....and they must be one of the major reasons.Its not only the huge profits they are taking out of peoples pockets but the users are also paying all the expenses and wages of each shop pre profit.AS Homefortea says if they are in the bookies doing their money,they cant be in the pub at the same time(now you are allowed to open after working people have finished work)and they cant go to the pub later or the next day if they have done all their money on the FOBTs.Supermarkets have always sold alcohol Banks.
They must have put far more people out of work,than jobs they have created.For example say a restaurant serves 40 people on an average night at £20a head,so takes £800 a night out of peoples disposable income.To do that they would say need to employ say 2 waiting staff,2 chiefs and an assistant plus a manager.Thats 6 jobs but in a bookmakers they would have one person(2 at the most)on in the evening taking(stealing)about the same amount of disposable income.Yes Banks a lot of restaurants and other similar businesses have gone bust due to these machines,taking tens of millions of working peoples money they would have spent on other forms of leisure. |
|
By:
...chefs...im getting worse than Grim.
|
|
By:
Supermarket beer sales overtook pub beer sales for the first time last year. Are you suggesting that this is due to B2 machines?
As a theoretical example consider that every single pound lost on machines resulted in a pound less spent on alcohol the total drop in UK alcohol sales would be less than 3%. |
|
By:
No surprise to see you on here defending FobtS again Banks and yet again you know all the details and statistics regarding bookmakers business!!!!!!!!!Gambling commission?
What is obvious to anyone who does not have a pro bookmaker agenda is in working areas these FOBT shops are taking over the High Streets.Did you see the documentary on the BBC last night saying the same,7 bookmakers in one small high street in Hackney(Mare Street),one of the poorest parts of the country.So in this small area these machines are by far the biggest taker of peoples spare money.5 years ago the millions taken from these poor people was available to spend in pubs,restaurants,take aways,off licences,butchers etc etc now its not.There are other reasons why pubs are closing and high streets are dying but the tens of millions being spent on FOBTs,that was previously spent on other businesses is one of the major causes. Not talking about supermarket increased beer sales,i am talking about a lot of people being too skint to go to the pub or being in a bookmakers in the evening whereas 5 years ago(pre fbot and late opening)they would have been in the pub. |
|
By:
A rudimentary understanding of how google works is sufficient.
|
|
By:
Strange hobby though
|
|
By:
Not really. There is so much crap spouted on here it is entertaining to disprove it and watch people claim black is white despite being presented definitive evidence to the contrary.
|
|
By:
You are a either a very bad person Banks or a very strange one.You know as well as i do that these machines are evil and damage tens of thousands of peoples lives.Yet you just keep coming on here with these pointless bookmaker arguments trying to defend them.You have proved nothing.If you get your entertainment by spending hours on here pushing bookmaker propaganda you need to get some more rewarding hobbies.
|
|
By:
I'm neither.
As I have explained many times before just because I offer an alternative side to discussions doesn't mean I am pro machines. The rubbish spouted on here is incredible. Many of the points put forward are naive and lack any depth. They are full of rhetoric which will get people nowhere but many, and I include you in this group, are impervious to this and as a result just rant on repeating the same points without any real understanding of how to get things changed. In some ways it is a shame as the same amount of effort put into trying to do something constructive about things may go some way towards effecting change. Unfortunately we now live in a victim dominated culture where people are more keen to point the finger than stand up and do anything to improve matters. |
|
By:
Just more twisting and turning from a well trained communicator.Strange how your mr reasonable alternative side of the argument act is ALWAYS pro bookmaker.
"In some ways it is a shame as the same amount of effort put into trying to do something constructive about things may go some way to effecting change".Exactly the type of meaningless rubbish you hear every day from well coached politicians.Just camouflage to try to shift the argument from the truth,which is that FOBTs are simply wrong because they cause huge damage to tens of thousands of people and their families,to lets be reasonable and take a middle path here.That way we can get away with continuing this legalised theft.No Banks there is no middle way with FOBTs,they are wrong and any decent person can see that. |
|
By:
QED.
It is pointless discussing with you because, like the pub bore, you don't have the mental capacity to develop an argument so just continue trotting out the same unsubstantiated lines. As a post script I am flattered that you think I am a well trained communicator. I have never received any such training and have never worked in anything like a comms/PR type of role in my life. I think what you really mean is that I had an education. It's not too late for you to learn things too however I suspect your missed place pride will prevent you ever accepting there is a need. |
|
By:
Misplaced, Shurley shome Mistake
![]() |
|
By:
After all your words Banks, what it comes down to is you defending the FOBTs in your own devious way and me and most others on here saying they are wrong.Just as you choose to defend everything bookmakers do.
|
|
By:
Nwt wrong with a bit of phonetic wording once in a while. I could claim it was deliberate to show I wasn't a trained communicator but that would be a lie.
That's what comes from trying to eat and type at the same time. Multi tasking was never my strong point! |
|
By:
Nowt
Christ life seems difficult today. |
|
By:
After all your words Banks, what it comes down to is you defending the FOBTs in your own devious way and me and most others on here saying they are wrong.Just as you choose to defend everything bookmakers do.
toronto44 that is exactly my point. I don't say they are right or wrong I merely point out the naievity of many of the reponses. When I give facts they are not aimed to support the other side of the argument rather that they highlight that unqualified opinions are completely worthless. Take the pub comment earlier. It is easy to say that B2s have decimated the pub trade and everyone nods in agreement and says how awful they are. If you were the operating these machines you could do what I did and google the numbers and see that if every pound spent on machines came at a direct cost of a pound from alcohol sales the total drop in alcohol sales would be no more than 3%. This show that the throwaway comment that B2s have crippled pubs is nonsense and would discredit the source it came from. A more sophisticated argument may have more traction but at the moment the machine operators must be laughing themselves to sleep every night at the lack of a credible stance against them. |
|
By:
toronto44 is correct.hth
|
|
By:
banks , do you bet on here ?
i never see you posting anything about horse racing such as who you think will win , what a bad ride a certain jockey gave a horse , having an opinion about anything to do with horse races etc . is it your hobby to post on threads about why people think bookmakers practices are wrong in the eyes of some ( not your eyes of course ) ? |
|
By:
I bet plenty but see no point swapping views with sources I can't verify.
I have a circle of friends who are keen punters whose opinions I trust and I prefer to keep my punting discussions confined to them. |
|
By:
toronto44 is correct.hth
Explain why? Base your response of facts not unsubstantiated opinion please. |
|
By:
I bet plenty but see no point swapping views with sources I can't verify.
Bit of a cop out, all these are on here are views with very little "Inside info". you dont need to verify a view, you either agree or disagree or may learn something. Lots of good threads on ante post and the Cheltenham forum. |
|
By:
First i dont trust any figures you come up with,no doubt you have all the figures to hand to twist the facts in favour of the continued misery these machines are causing.Maybe you could post these figures and their source,do they come from the bookmaker paid for Gambling Commission?You can prove anything with a clever statistician except the truth.
Second you then twist these dodgy statistics.Your figures are for total alcohol sales.As you said yourself supermarkets account now for more than half of all alcohol sales.So that leaves the rest say 45%, split between pubs,off licences,hotels,restaurants,bars,holiday camps,private clubs,sports centers and a lot more.So the alleged 3% drop in sales becomes say 7% after taking out supermarkets.Then say pubs are selling 60% of the 45% left,we then have even with your figures a drop in sales of say 11% due directly to the FOBTs.This is more than enough to send tens of thousands of already struggling pubs out of business, |
|
By:
Bit of a cop out, all these are on here are views with very little "Inside info". you dont need to verify a view, you either agree or disagree or may learn something. Lots of good threads on ante post and the Cheltenham forum.
I don't disagree with that and I do read loads of posts to see if there is any info I have missed but I'm not a big fan of swapping tips with strangers. It seems a fairly pointless exercise to me. |
|
By:
But not a pointless exercise to spend hours on here arguing for and defending bookmakers.
|
|
By:
First i dont trust any figures you come up
That is beyond childish. You don't lie the conclusions so you pretend the facts aren't true! Which figures don't you trust? I get them all through google and will happily post the source for every stat I make. As for your use of stats well your alcohol tale starts with one verified stat, alters it and then drifts off into a raft of assumptions and estimations. No wonder your arguments fall at the first hurdle. |
|
By:
Not so much about swopping tips imo, more an exchange of information on a certain animal, racetrack, trend, sectional time, place to stay, ive got tickets of a forumite before, info on a last minute place to stay for the Open meeting and many other snippets.
Its good to put back in something yourself if you can, ive found places to stay for others and often contribute to threads about the draw, watering, stalls positions and bet settlement and queries to people who need help. |
|
By:
But not a pointless exercise to spend hours on here arguing for and defending bookmakers.
I spend way way more time sorting out my own punting, speaking to friends about it and travelling all over wathing events. Apologies for not writing a diary listing it all on here for your consumption. |
|
By:
My facts are obvious common sense.Even if the figure is say just a 7% drop in business due to FOBTs,the number of pubs closing due to them would be huge.
Twist and turn as much as you like but you have helped prove my point about pub closures with you own figures. |
|
By:
Banks, Bon Viveur...Give it a rest.The poor and feckless have only so much money to spend. (unless they turn to crime which I am sure that you have the latest statistics to hand no doubt !)If it goes in the FOBT's then it is lost to the economy as a whole.That conclusion isn't Rocket Science !!
Now calm down, the wine bars of Central London are now open and it is time to discuss the finer points of business with your circle of friends, and you can delight them with tales of dividends from your Bookmaker Shareholdings.. No point in getting worked up and making all those spelling mistakes !! |
|
By:
My facts are obvious common sense.
Oh dear. That is possibly the most ridiculous phrase I have seen on here in many a year and there is some stiff competition to beat! I can only assume you are on a wind up. I worry for you if not. |
|
By:
Sometimes its better to just take it on the chin Banks and get your strength up for the next bookmaker v punter debate.Why not go back to HQ and get fresh instructions.
Still no source for those figures then!!!!!!!! |