Forums

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 202 comments are related to the topic:
Tingle Creek (9th Dec)

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 202
By:
eric_morris
When: 23 Nov 17 08:35
£46.9 billion in bets in a year a large amount will be racing. How much damage can be done to the punter with shared information between the sportsman controlling the participants and therefore results and the bookie? DIRECT FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THEM SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED
By:
eric_morris
When: 23 Nov 17 09:04
Ray Winstone on adverts says he isnt a problem gambler but why would he be when he is likely to get his slate cleaned it is others who seem to have problems betting such vast amounts. This is just ONE BOOKIE.

I had a small bet on a Gosden horse yesterday who in my opinion wasnt trying. The race was worth just over 3 grand. It made me think how fking grossly incompetent are the BHA when prize money is so low that connections in this country have to cheat to play the game.

The profits made by just this one bookie are filthy when they arent going back into sport, mainly to Ray Winstone in hundreds, possibly thousands  of repeat adverts by the look of it. I repeat HOW INCOMPETENT ARE THE BHA WHEN SUCH VAST PROFITS ARE BEING TAKEN AND NOT BEING PUT TOWARDS PRIZE MONEY AND STABLE WAGES. About time Douglas Double-Barrell Fkwit was replaced by intelligent people who arent chosen for reasons of class but for reasons of their ability to get a fair slice of bookie profits for racing. It is even killing hournalism in the sport as Lydia said the people who can pay the money for participant output now are the bookies and not the media.

With the hundreds of billions bet across bookmakers it is only a matter of time before some of the real life versions of the criminals Winstone portrays in film are running bookies mercilessly ripping apart the nouse of John Bashford-Bog**** of the BHA.
By:
eric_morris
When: 23 Nov 17 09:12
Rich Ricci moving from banking to bookies must see these riches and the gross incompetence of the class system running racing and think Barclays is small beer when you can set up a bookies to fleece this lot.
By:
unclepuncle
When: 23 Nov 17 10:29
I doubt if more than 10% of that profit or turnover comes from horse racing (and less than 1% from antepost horseracing).

Also as the current funding model is based on a percentage of bookmaker profits surely it is in racings interest for the bookies to make as much profit as possible from horse racing punters?
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 23 Nov 17 18:52
Ladbrokes/Coral`s annual revenue last year was 2.4 billion.Of that only thousands at best would be attributable to ante-post money taken following misinformation coming from a trainer.
By:
eric_morris
When: 23 Nov 17 19:42
I beg to differ ... Vautour for one would have gained bookies fortunes. Connections only let you know late these days for Cheltenham.
By:
eric_morris
When: 23 Nov 17 19:46
Finians Oscar - Supreme or Sun Alliance Hurdle, ended neither, information released the weekend before the Festival

Neon Wolf - Supreme or Sun Alliance, Sun Alliance indicated weekend before the Festival
By:
eric_morris
When: 23 Nov 17 19:53
£46.9 billion in bets and that is just Bet£3.65. Regardless of antepost the total amount for racing would be a good proportion of that. We are talking billions at stake there is no doubt there should be no ‘sponsorship’ of trainers by bookies.
By:
MissiontoMars
When: 23 Nov 17 20:41
did i miss something, I thought this was a tingle creak thread!
By:
firstimevisor
When: 23 Nov 17 21:17
Sorry mtm but there is an important issue at stake here.

Ericmorris, you are well aware that finian's oscar missed the festival through injury. Whinging about it is ridiculous.And Neon Wolf ran in the Sun Alliance.Again, whinging because he didn't run in the Supreme or because they didn't decide which race until the last minute is just juvenile.That is their absolute right. Why in gods name do you bother to bet ante-post with that attitude.
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 24 Nov 17 08:21
Year ending March 2016 Bet365 revenue 1.55 billion. Not sure where the 46.9 billion came from.
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Nov 17 13:08
My money is on UDS running. At 7.8 here (Exchange) it could prove a gift come race day.
By:
sageform
When: 25 Nov 17 09:03
The important issue at stake is the right of owners and trainers to assess the conditions at declaration time before committing a horse to run in a race. They should not make confident statements about being a definite runner and then change their mind, but they should not run a horse that is not quite 100% just because it has been backed ante post either. It would be better if they didn't make any announcements via social media as only half the population at best will see it.
By:
impossible123
When: 28 Nov 17 15:07
Regards Douvan, Mullis has taken on the baton with Ricci conspicuous by his silence. We could yet see Douvan running here this time after the false alarm of last season, but only seeing is believing. Until then, still a probability for his presence.
By:
sageform
When: 01 Dec 17 18:46
Douvan will be hard to beat if at his best but Politologue is the one I will be on if it runs. I am not prepared to play ante post with so many uncertain runners.
By:
impossible123
When: 01 Dec 17 20:46
With the sideline of Altior Mullins looks like allowing Douvan (evens) to take his chance here rather than UDS, the defending champion. But the well-being and form of Douvan will have to be taken on trust after his poor showing in the Champion Chase this year.

Not a race for me unless UDS runs.
By:
woodmanchester
When: 02 Dec 17 08:35
8/1 Un De Sceaux suggests wont be taking part, to me

Going Aintree so will watch Tingle Creek in bookies
By:
impossible123
When: 02 Dec 17 09:49
Agree, UDS is an unlikely runner now. A great shame the defending champion has not been allowed to defend his crown; a win for Ricci (again) over the other owners in the stable and robbing racegoers of a competitive race. No wonder Gigginstown took their horses away.
By:
irishone
When: 02 Dec 17 23:54
nothing to do with ricci.
they were taken out because rather than pay a small rise in stable fees oleary offered mullins more horses on the same rates
mullins has spread his risk by recruiting new owners who have paid the first rise in stable fees for 5 years
By:
impossible123
When: 03 Dec 17 12:08
Maybe so...Gigginstown quibbling over a few squids at the expense of quality training and performances on the race tracks? Unless, of course, the same standard of training and achievement on the race tracks can be achieved elsewhere too for less. Anyway, it is evidently clear the Gigginstown horses have been doing more battles on the tracks against the Mullins' post their separation eg Apples Jade vs Nichols Canyon (today), and in the past.

A gain for racegoers and punters which can only be good for National Hunt Racing in general.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 03 Dec 17 13:23
No idea why you'd expect UDS and Douvan to race each other on this occasion. First outing of season for UDS and Douvan coming back from injury. The Hilly Way is a decent race for one of them to run in the following day and I believe the UDS syndicate is Cork based whilst Ricci lives in south of UK somewhere. In recent times Tizzard has n't run Thistlecrack, Native River and Cue Card against each other outside of the King George or the Gold Cup and I can't recall Kauto Star taking Denman on other than in the Gold Cup. Although I doubt UDS and Douvan will meet at the Festival either given how impressive UDS was in last season's Ryanair.

It'll still be a competitive race assuming Fox Norton runs as he has clearly improved and Douvan has a little bit to prove now.

There's 6 days to go anyway, outlook for the race could change yet...
By:
buddeliea
When: 05 Dec 17 12:38
From an owner/trainer point of view I guess it makes perfect sense for UDS and Douvan to be kept separate.
Its a real shame for us and the sport not to see clashes that excite during the season, and not just in the Spring, but those days are long gone it seems.
Big shame imo.
By:
impossible123
When: 05 Dec 17 13:03
It is a great shame Douvan and UDS are not allowed to do battle against each other here. Also, Douvan would not be targeting this race let alone running in it if Altior had been sound, and that is a fact!
By:
firstimevisor
When: 05 Dec 17 13:15
Why would Mullins send both horses abroad to take each other on, having their first runs of the season, and leave the Hilly Way chase behind for someone else to pick up?
That wouldn't make him a clever trainer.
By:
unclepuncle
When: 05 Dec 17 14:52
impossible123
05 Dec 17 13:03
Also, Douvan would not be targeting this race let alone running in it if Altior had been sound, and that is a fact!

Please provide your evidence?
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 05 Dec 17 15:59
Even by your own standards, you are talking some serious nonsense on this thread impossible123.

Mullins would have to be plain thick to send them both over for this.
By:
buddeliea
When: 05 Dec 17 17:11
Yes he would , but if I owned UDS or Douvan I would rather win the Tingle than the Hilly.
Still UDS has won the Tingle so might as well let Douvan have a go.
By:
firstimevisor
When: 05 Dec 17 17:35
If I owned UDS I would rather win the Hilly Way at my local track than finish second or maybe third at best in a Tingle Creek, and I wouldn't want him facing a monster like Douvan on his first run back after a long break.
Why would I want to give him a hard race like that fto. He would be 5-1 or 6-1 to beat Douvan where he's a near cert for Cork which is only 2 hours down the road. This game is all about winning.
By:
The Headmaster
When: 05 Dec 17 17:49
Or.....If Ricci was mad enough to let me train Douvan I think I'd be quite wary of both travelling him and throwing him into a G1 on his first run back after injury, no matter how well he looked at home.  His season is all about March not the Tingle Creek.  No reason to doubt that he is working the house down, but if I was to suddenly change my mind and prefer the softer launch of a Hilly Way, it would certainly do Un De Sceaux's chances no harm if I told his rivals' connections that Douvan was eyeballs out and heading for Sandown Plain
By:
The Headmaster
When: 05 Dec 17 17:54
More than happy to take a punt at 11/1 e/w 1st 3 knowing I may well be on a non.
By:
buddeliea
When: 05 Dec 17 18:44
After his last run I don't think UDS or any other top two miler needs to be scared of facing Douvan.
He has to prove he's back to his form before the Queen Mum.
And maybe a question mark there with the horse he kept beating proving to be a stayer.
All in all,no reason at this stage to be worried about taking Douvan on imo.
And I agree with the statement that he would not be at Sandown if Altior was.
By:
firstimevisor
When: 05 Dec 17 19:09
He got an injury last time..its not as though he ran his normal race but just wasn't good enough.

I believe he's a cert on Saturday but even if you are right and he has it all to prove, then why would WPM want to run him against UDS on his comeback run?

There were 3 Grade 1s in Ireland last Sunday yet there wasn't a solitary runner from the other side of the pond. Yet people are not happy with Mullins just bringing his best horse over to Sandown for a Grade 1-they criticise him for not running 2 of his stars against each other as its somehow not being fair to the public.
By:
buddeliea
When: 05 Dec 17 20:21
I never said they should meet or that Mullins would want them to meet,I just said it's a shame we don't see more horses meet each other during the season and not just in the spring.
Like I said those days are long gone and for me it's a shame.
As for Douvan,any horse coming back from injury has to prove he's as good,and as Sizing John is probably the best horse he has beaten and is a stayer,then it's quiet possible Douvan has to prove he's actually as good as most think he is.
Just summising  and throwing things out there for discussion,as a forum is there for.
By:
betilyerded
When: 05 Dec 17 20:26
Backed Special Tiara e/w at 25's. Looks between Fox Norton and Mullins selected for the win but thats too big a price for a horse that almost won this 2 years back and is the reigning champ at 2 miles and has needed his comeback run for the past 3 seasons.
By:
Hibore
When: 05 Dec 17 21:20
It must be a big ask for Douvan to win returning from Injury against race fit horses (Fox and Poli). If he ran 3rd beaten under 5 or 6 lengths Willie would be really pleased.

However, does he deserve his lofty reputation ? He can only beat the horses running against him but has he ever beaten a top class 2 miler.

I think 5/2 Fox Norton could be the bet of the day. If he is going to beat Douvan this season this surely will be it..he's only rated 6lbs inferior anyway.
By:
impossible123
When: 05 Dec 17 22:14
It is a big ask for a horse to win in his 1st run back after a pelvic injury especially in a Tingle Creek, but then would Mullins/Ricci be embarking on this route, if not? The Douvan prior to his Queen Mother defeat would be 2/7 for this, but he is 4/5 on saturday - bookies not convinced perhaps.
By:
Hibore
When: 05 Dec 17 22:47
I think the bookies are playing games with Douvan's odds anyway. If all the money is for him he would be 4/6 or 4/7 however he's still 4/5 or 10/11.
I'm reading it that they are happy to lay as much of that as they can and have the field take him on.
By:
impossible123
When: 06 Dec 17 10:08
Douvan is evens now.
By:
unclepuncle
When: 06 Dec 17 10:23
And UDS has come in on here siginficantly - got to love Willie.Laugh

Personally if I was in their position I would run UDS here and Douvan in the easier race in Ireland.
By:
firstimevisor
When: 06 Dec 17 10:41
Wouldn't be the biggest shock. They were both due to gallop yesterday so there may have been something significant there.
Page 2 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com