Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1576 comments are related to the topic:
Epsom Derby 2017

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 10 of 40  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 40 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,576
By:
impossible123
When: 16 May 17 16:08
1) Call To Mind: rated 36; the horse he beat was comprehensively beaten on his 1st start. (non-entity/discard).
2) Wolf Country: rated 90: last season finished behind Glencadam Glory (beaten by Best Solution in the worst Derby trial,
                 The Anvil and Okool - (non-entity/discard, a miracle if Derby standard)
3) Valcartier: trained by Gosden (Cracksman); beat a horse rated 76; comprehensively beaten by Mirage Dancer last
               season (non-entity/discard).
4) Forest Ranger: rated 94; beat a horse rated 79; claimed to fame beating Syphax (average juvenile form) on artificial
                  turf; dosage figures suggest unlikely to stay 12f.
5) Contrapposto: rated 92; comprehensively beaten by Rivet and Eminent when up in class.

Even in this year's renewal I'd struggle to contemplate backing any of them come Derby day.
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:18
I heard from a man close to AO'b all number of things - not to be aired publicly - but when the issue of Cliffs of Moher came up he couldn't have been more enthusiastic ...

I know from experience the last person to take a tip from is the trainer, as to do what they do they have to believe in their horses ... but the vibes were very good - that he finished strongly (thought previously that 1m2 was he trip), that he'll come on leaps and bounds, he's going there as the probable no1
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:20
*Ballydoyle No1* i.e. Ryan Moore - obv not the absolute No1, no one knows what that will be yet ...
By:
Fallen Angel
When: 16 May 17 16:20
@ffs, that appears to have been bourne out by the betting the last couple of days. Cliffs was weak up until yesterday but came in for strong support throughout yesterday. At the same time Churchill has been noticeably easier to back.
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:25

May 16, 2017 -- 9:36AM, lewisham ranger wrote:


completely agree with the headmaster. Perhaps Swiss storm and wolf country won't achieve much but you could hardly make sweeping statements about their potential at this stage. Anything is possible for them.Another sweeping and difficult to understand statement he comes out with is:The form of Crystal Ocean is no better than Mirage Dancer so why the price discrepancy; the support for him is solely on the reputation of his trainer, and the lack of any outstanding horse so far. These two horses have achieved far less than Midterm.His breeding is better than Mirage Dancer. You can't just put the two together; every horse stands in isolation. Plus perhaps you should check Stoute's record In the Dante stakes and his record in the Derby in general before you start writing this horse off before he's even been given a chance. Perhaps it's hard to understand, but the money for him over the last few days for the Dante and Derby is underpinned by more knowledge than some random bloke who makes sweeping statements on an internet forum.


Not disagreeing with anything re: Cystal Ocean, but it was widely reported that his price had contracted so much due to a shortage of liquidity, so I'd take him with obv interest but also a grain of salt.

Compate to the Vase, Dee, Trial ... there was a lot of money floating about, now we're in the lull before the storm, doesn't take much more than a positive workout and a few whispers to move the price as much as it has

By:
Madhu
When: 16 May 17 16:27
ffs, old news mate and well put out there by all accounts by Joseph O'Brien on his ****.com blog recently. Is this bloke close enough for you?

The Derby has a very open look to it this year, there isn’t a standout colt at present. My father saddled three nice colts to fill the placings in the Chester Vase, while Cliffs Of Moher impressed me in the Dee Stakes. Dad mentioned afterwards that he’s the colt that might improve the most from the trials. I noticed that **** made him Derby favourite afterwards and I think he’ll have a big say on June 3rd.
By:
impossible123
When: 16 May 17 16:29
One reasonable question to ask of CoM backer: why did AOB choose to run CoM in the Dee Stakes instead of the Chester Vase ie the race that US Army Ranger ran in last year? It could not have been the date of race and the course unless AOB had reservation of his stamina, matureness and/or ability. Could he have the French Derby as an alternative given a shorter distance?
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:29

May 16, 2017 -- 10:20AM, Fallen Angel wrote:


@ffs, that appears to have been bourne out by the betting the last couple of days. Cliffs was weak up until yesterday but came in for strong support throughout yesterday. At the same time Churchill has been noticeably easier to back.


I'll check myself and Aidan into the asylum if Churchill runs, just can't see it. Sheikh Mo gave it a go w DA, but much cooler heads prevail at Coolmore / Ballydoyle - the Stud record of the Derby isn't even that huge - e.g. Pour Moi drafted in to NH duties to replace (dead) Fame and Glory,

Camelot could be next on the block.

By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:31

May 16, 2017 -- 10:29AM, impossible123 wrote:


One reasonable question to ask of CoM backer: why did AOB choose to run CoM in the Dee Stakes instead of the Chester Vase ie the race that US Army Ranger ran in last year? It could not have been the date of race and the course unless AOB had reservation of his stamina, matureness and/or ability. Could he have the French Derby as an alternative given a shorter distance?


The distance - AO'b thought his dam only barely 5f, Jack Bauer (fair play to him) thought she dam got 7f,  so step back 2f

By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:37
Ballydoyle might run 3, they might run 4, (VB, Com, Yucatan, and one more, Capri / Douglas Macarthur / something from the Dante), but the French Derby is not on the cards after CoM finished out the extended 1m2 very well, and nothing came on in the Derrinstown.

Wonder if Mr Oppenheimer has his eyes on a Royal Ascot raid ???
By:
impossible123
When: 16 May 17 16:41
Thank-you.

If CoM was a certain runner and AOB's 1st string connections would have steamed into his price post the Dee Stakes. This stable is renowned for backing their horses prior to and on race day eg Winter and Churchill, so far. As such, despite my antepost cover bets at 10/1 and 8/1, I'm still unconvinced neither his participation nor stable status. But I hope he turns up or Churchill does, either way a sure winner for me.

VB and Capri could be candidate for the French equivalent given their market behaviour here.
By:
Fallen Angel
When: 16 May 17 16:46
The concerns around the possible stamina limitations were a matter of public record before the dee stakes. As impossible notes he wasn't particularly strong in the day after the race, having initially shortened before hand. Over the weekend he could be backed at a bigger price than before the race, however on monday that begun to change and COM is back to ante-post favourite on here. That hasn't quite been born out by bookie prices yet as the picture is still clouded by Churchill. To be fair liquidity is fairly limited so its difficult to say with any certainty what the market moves actually mean.
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:53

May 16, 2017 -- 10:41AM, impossible123 wrote:


Thank-you.If CoM was a certain runner and AOB's 1st string connections would have steamed into his price post the Dee Stakes. This stable is renowned for backing their horses prior to and on race day eg Winter and Churchill, so far. As such, despite my antepost cover bets at 10/1 and 8/1, I'm still unconvinced neither his participation nor stable status. But I hope he turns up or Churchill does, either way a sure winner for me.VB and Capri could be candidate for the French equivalent given their market behaviour here.


I agree that the owners, Tabor and Smith in particular, like a good gamble - but there isn't liquidity around to match that kind of punter.

I remember after Gleneagles was disqualified in France, during the inspection Clair Balding asked Tabor if he had backed the horse and he said "Yes I did", She asked him if he had backed Dylan Thomas and he said "I backed him also", she gasped "You dind't do a double did you !?", Tabor nearly exploded laughing before blurting out "You think any bookmaker would take a double from ME!?" ...

By:
Figgis
When: 16 May 17 16:54
From this

1) CoM will be scratched from the Epsom Derby because of the participation of Churchill; inexperience; immaturity, and still a
   horse-in-progress.
2) should CoM run, either Cracksmans, Yucatan, Mirage Dancer and Churchill (runs/not soft ground) will finish infront of him


To this

my antepost cover bets at 10/1 and 8/1... a sure winner for me

A prior ante post rabbit is suddenly pulled out of the hat a day later Laugh
By:
brigust1
When: 16 May 17 16:58
This only goes to cement my views on the damage Coolmore are doing to racing. Had the fancied contenders namely Churchill, Cliffs of Moher, Yucatan, Venice Beach, Exemplar, Douglas MacArthur, Capri, Orderofthegarter, Sir John Lavery and The Anvil to name but a few been shared out between the other top trainers we would have a much clearer picture about what was running and in the end who the best horse is. Deciding at Ballydoyle on the gallops and for certain breeding purposes is not good for racing and makes a mockery of the ante post market. It is something I have been against for many years. Many top trainers would be proud to train any of these horses and give them every chance to achieve their full potential.
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 16:58

May 16, 2017 -- 10:54AM, Figgis wrote:


From this1) CoM will be scratched from the Epsom Derby because of the participation of Churchill; inexperience; immaturity, and still a    horse-in-progress. 2) should CoM run, either Cracksmans, Yucatan, Mirage Dancer and Churchill (runs/not soft ground) will finish infront of himTo thismy antepost cover bets at 10/1 and 8/1... a sure winner for meA prior ante post rabbit is suddenly pulled out of the hat a day later


You were on v early ? well done - it paid to pay attention to that maiden

By:
impossible123
When: 16 May 17 16:59
I believe CoM's price contraction is influenced by the non-upbeat soundbite from connections of Cracksman, and not the yah/nay participation of Churchill who is presently still shorter than prior to the Dee Stakes. Without meaning to be a party pooper I do not envisage an enlightening Dante from the race and/or where the betting market is concerned.
By:
brigust1
When: 16 May 17 17:07
There is very little liquidity on here I believe we will hear from the bookies first this time.
By:
impossible123
When: 16 May 17 17:23
Low liquidity helps if one is a buyer here, I find.

CoM at about 7 here may turn out to be a good lay especially if Cracksman excels on thursday; if the reverse is true CoM will be shorter (further lay perhaps) as he could be rerouted. I'd like to see some stable interest on Eminent.
By:
Figgis
When: 16 May 17 17:35
The chances of CoM being rerouted must be about 20/1 unless he has a setback, which could happen to any of them. If he remains well he runs, regardless of whether the Guineas winner runs or not. No doubt imp will reveal if he has laid him or not after the event.
By:
brigust1
When: 16 May 17 17:48
I'm not so sure. I think Com will benefit from give and if Churchill runs could be saved for the Irish Derby. I don't think his form is good enough to win an average Derby plus he may need more time.
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 17:48
Any info on THUNDER SNOW - a very interesting possible - I see he's back home and Sin nominated the Irish 2000 as a possible ??
By:
Figgis
When: 16 May 17 17:51
I don't think his form is good enough to win an average Derby

So which horses is he up against who you think have shown form good enough to win an average Derby?
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 17:52

May 16, 2017 -- 11:48AM, brigust1 wrote:


I'm not so sure. I think Com will benefit from give and if Churchill runs could be saved for the Irish Derby. I don't think his form is good enough to win an average Derby plus he may need more time.


I said it once before but I'll repeat it once - No chance Churchill runs, now they have a legit runner (indeed the fav).

As mentioned above, the love affair between Coolmore and the Derby may be true, but in this day when Speed is the dominant commodity sought by breeders, their love affair with money is infinitely more

By:
Figgis
When: 16 May 17 17:57
I think Com will benefit from give

In most years in this era the ground is well watered at Epsom. Nevertheless, on what basis will he benefit from give?
By:
lewisham ranger
When: 16 May 17 18:01
doubt COM will still be fav after Thursday

derby crying out for an impressive trial winner- given the strength of the dante this year I doubt it'll disappoint
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 18:01
It's hardly going to be rattling fast anyway, plus a good surface will help see him home. I don't think he has any chinks, if there's one good enough to beat him so be it, but atm he's a worthy fav

No info on Thunder Snow ???

Interesting Q - all-things-equal re Dante, what price CoM if Churchill withdrawn due to CoM being the No1 ???
By:
brigust1
When: 16 May 17 18:01
Beating Bay if Poets, Max Zorin and Mirage Dancer is not Derby form. You may think that he has bags of improvement in him but there is no evidence that is true it is just your opinion.
The way he ran at Chester showed quite clearly he wasn't a quick horse so the slower the ground and the stronger the pace would inconvenience others but suit him.
By:
Figgis
When: 16 May 17 18:03
You may think that he has bags of improvement in him but there is no evidence that is true it is just your opinion

I have already stated it is just my opinion, that's all it can be at this stage, I've said I could be wrong.

I ask you again, so which horses is he up against who you think have shown form good enough to win an average Derby?
By:
brigust1
When: 16 May 17 18:10
You are basing all of your opinions on what you believe AOB and even Ryan Moore thinks. None of it is based in fact.

I believe Churchill, Venice Beach, Eminent, Yucatan and Best Solution have all shown better form than CoM to name but a few.
By:
A_T
When: 16 May 17 18:14
until they run at the highest level we've little idea of just how good a horse's best is. apart from those that ran in the Guineas none of the runners have shown form good enough to win a Derby - but they may well be good enough when it comes to the day.
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 18:16

May 16, 2017 -- 12:10PM, brigust1 wrote:


You are basing all of your opinions on what you believe AOB and even Ryan Moore thinks. None of it is based in fact. I believe Churchill, Venice Beach, Eminent, Yucatan and Best Solution have all shown better form than CoM to name but a few.


It's not just opinion, the belief about Cliffs of Moher is based on Supposition, Inference, Logical Reasoning. He was an outstanding 2yo, AO'B has a long-held policy of getting them ready to race so that they improve as they reach their target. What he did at Chester was absolutely fine and all evidence points to him going up a lot.

By:
lewisham ranger
When: 16 May 17 18:18
On the COM subject, most of O'Brien's derby winners in recent years were considered quick enough to run in the 2000 guineas beforehand (Ruler of the world being an exception)
By:
ffs
When: 16 May 17 18:19
If anyone tells you - this thing is a Sure Thing - run a mile. They are not machines, but a lot can be predicted by studying the patterns and reading the history - not enough that you never back a loser, but more than enough to make money
By:
A_T
When: 16 May 17 18:19
CoM was most certainly not an outstanding 2yo - unless wining a maiden is how you define outstanding
By:
lewisham ranger
When: 16 May 17 18:20
and all evidence points to him going up a lot.

Surely it's conjecture that points to him going up a lot, rather than evidence. There's no overwhelming evidence that COM is going to come on in leaps and bounds. Actually Venice Beach has just as good credentials but has been largely overlooked
By:
lewisham ranger
When: 16 May 17 18:21
ffs did you ever post on another forum as Zarkava?
By:
A_T
When: 16 May 17 18:21
most of O'Brien's derby winners in recent years were considered quick enough to run in the 2000 guineas beforehand

2 from 3 is hardly a big sample - go back further Galileo and High Chapparal weren't guineas runners
By:
A_T
When: 16 May 17 18:23
It's not just opinion, the belief about Cliffs of Moher is based on Supposition, Inference, Logical Reasoning.

you forgot to mention guessing
By:
impossible123
When: 16 May 17 18:26
If the ground comes up soft which could be likely CoM's stamina will be put to the utmost test. If so, I hope to get better value elsewhere but mainly from the Irish trials.

I certainly would not call CoM an outstanding 2 yr old: he beat Orderofthegarter on an off day (no world beater or The Gurkha) who beat a "pig" called Taj Mahal. That form is even inferior to US Army Ranger!
Page 10 of 40  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 40 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com