|
By:
Dante -- there is an awful lot of rain forecast, so this might be yet another trial we cannot take at face value.
Not to mention that Telescope is out, and Greatwood and Trading Leather need fast ground. |
|
By:
Big shame about Telescope. The one horse who had the potential to blow the market wide open.
|
|
By:
seems a racecourse gallop will be used and they plan on taking the Derby anyway!
|
|
By:
If Telescope stil runs at Epsom I'll be totally amazed.
|
|
By:
Agree uncle, personally think there is no chance of him runnin now
![]() |
|
By:
Absolutely gutted he's injured. If anyone can get a maiden to win a classic its Stoute but he clearly faces a race against time, and with so little experience it'd take some training performance for him to win at Epsom. Time to start praying :(
|
|
By:
Apparently got injured (cut leg) in a horse lorry not on the gallops or in his box. Surely they bandage their legs up for trave1 - I mena thye fly horses to Australia and America and they never seem to have cut legs.
Given I have a large double running up on him @ 16/1 with Dawn Approach @ 5/1 already in the bag I bloody well hope the driver and lad or lass in charge at the time will be getting a P45 very shortly. And yes that is pocket talking of the highest order. ![]() |
|
By:
Unfortunate for Telescope backers but for those who believe that there is still hope (the injury is minor, its the infection that's the concern)given the still positive views expressed by connections concerning Epsom, then the current price of c20.0 is worth the risk for small stakes. After all, Lammtarra had one run and one win as a 2yr and went to Epsom in 1995 without a prep. Went on to win the Arc. It can be done.
|
|
By:
Lammtarra was followed by Shaamit in 96 who won first time as a 3yr following one run as a 2yr old. Going further back, Morston didn't run as at 2, won a Lingfield maiden as prep before winning the 73 Derby. There are probably others. And for those who think that DA's chance has significantly improved, the only other Derby winner I can think of which ran over 5f as a 2yr old was Generous who won the Derby in 91 who had more stamina in his pedigree than DA. How many 5f winners at 2 have tried and failed in the Derby, I wonder. Bolger certainly didn't regard DA as a stayer at that point (unlike New Approach who he always saw as a stayer. Just a thought.
|
|
By:
The Investec Derby has also eluded Hannon, but he believes he has a live contender in Van Der Neer. The son of Dutch Art is on course for the premier Classic on June 1 after putting in his best work at the finish when third to Dawn Approach in the Qipco 2000 Guineas.
"The Derby is a definite. We're going to go there. He's a sharp horse and he stays. He's 20-1 and it's a good price," said the Herridge handler. Toronado was supposed to be the Hannon first string at Newmarket but he faded badly close home after holding every chance and was a neck behind Van der Neer in fourth place. "He's fine now. He rattled his palate a bit and I think he got it over the windpipe, but we've dealt with it," said Hannon. "A furlong and a half out it looked like being a two-horse race then Hughesie said it felt like he hit a brick wall. When he pulled up he was gasping. He's obviously stopped and his wind has caused him a problem." Taken some 60+, seems very much on the big side given he is a definite now! |
|
By:
Presumably the Telescope problem is whether antibiotics to treat the infection (and anti-inflammatories for the swelling) will clear from his system in time.
Shades of Binocular before the Champion Hurdle. Hey! Binocular, Telescope: what are the odds against that coincidence? |
|
By:
sadblokes pushed this horse out to 6 on there own just after sundays derristown how did they know this was going to happen
|
|
By:
I still have no bet but my shortlist of 3 looks like it's been whittled down to 1, as even though it would be foolish to rule out Telescope I couldn't back him now. Trading Leather has always been my main fancy, even though Montiridge didn't do much for the Autumn Stakes form last night I still maintain it was proper 2yo Derby form potential from TL. The big worry is whether he's trained on or not.
|
|
By:
Ladbrokes have always been shortest about Battle of Marengo: 4/1 as opposed to 11/2 with Hills and Corals. The corollary is they were a point longer about Telescope. In fact, Oddschecker suggests they cut Telescope on Sunday. Ladbrokes may have heard rumours -- the injury must have happened sufficiently long ago for infection to set in -- but I'm not sure this is a smoking gun.
|
|
By:
@Figgis -- another worry about Trading Leather is that a wet Dante may scupper a horse sent to Britain last year because he needs fast ground.
|
|
By:
Given the rain forecast tonight i dont think Trading Leather will run tomorrow(Greatwood either for that matter) which would make him highly unlikely to run at Epsom imo
shame as i av him in the book too |
|
By:
Ramruma, I don't agree with Bolger's excuse that his poor run in the RPT was entirely due to the ground. On watching him that day I don't believe he was going to run to form whatever the ground. I said before the race that I was disappointed they were running him as it would probably come too soon after what I thought was a big effort previously. However, yes I agree that soft ground won't be ideal as the trainer has always said he's better on decent ground.
|
|
By:
run Thurs**
|
|
By:
What is happening with Nevis? he is now out to 180 does anyone know if something is wrong?
|
|
By:
If DA stays then he is the most probable winner. He has a higher rating going into the race at 127 RPR than any Derby winner for the past 25 years but is it too high for a horse with a lot of speed? Nashwan was a 12f horse with enough speed to win at 8f and he was rated 126 RPR after the 2000 gns. Erhaab was also given 126 after the Dante.Other than these the rest have, in the main, shown significant improvement to win at epsom.
With Telescope having a question mark against him, the French not really impressing, does AOB have the answer with all his options? Looking back at Chester, Magician showed the kind of turn of foot that we should expect in a Derby winner but why is he out to 70.0 unless Chantilly is calling. BOM hasn't really impressed in 2 runs, whilst ROTW stays but didn't show the toe one likes to see. Mars has to prove something, so the one that takes my eye now is Indian Chief. His win showed that he has a turn of foot and as he is bred for 12f perhaps he can step up in the Dante and put himself in the frame. At 20.0 he is interesting. |
|
By:
Sandown, I don't know enough about RPRs but have they remained at a consistent level over the years or did they suffer the same 'slippage' as official ratings? Nashwan's figure looks comparatively high for what was an ordinary Guineas run in an average kind of time. Often it does take reasonable improvement to win the Derby but I would also argue that 4 of the last 5 winners did not need to improve at all as far as time performances are concerned.
|
|
By:
Sandown, another matter to consider is that if DA doesn't stay, as we both think he probably won't, to what degree will his performance suffer? Will he bomb out completely after the 10f pole, or will he just run a few pounds below his best but still remain competitive, in the style of El Gran Senor? EGS ran the year before I started to seriously take an interest in racing, but when I retrospectively put a figure on his Guineas win it was the same as the one I have for DA, albeit EGS faced some better horses.
|
|
By:
Figgis, as far as I can tell, they have, albeit always a bit higher than OR's. I made a study of the RPR's of Derby winners of the past 24 years and found that on average they improved 9lb from previous PB (personal best)in winning the Derby. Only Sir Percy was said to run below its PB by 2lbs. 10 won on their 4th run and 19 within 6 runs.
TF have DA at 132 ! No wonder people believe it only has to turn up. |
|
By:
Figgis
To answer you last post, and using RPR's, Entrpreneur dropped -14 lbs, King of kings -57, Golan+ 1, Refuse to bend -23. I'll look up El Gran Senor from another source. |
|
By:
One other thing. After 4 runs you can more or less forget about significant improvement in RPR's.Only Sinndar and Oath managed double figure improvement and that was on their 5th runs.
|
|
By:
Figgis
re El Gran Senor. TF rated him 136 in their annual and Secreto was rated 128. So I guess you could say that EGS ran 8/9 lb below his best on TF ratings. |
|
By:
Sandown , actually I backed Oath on the strength of the time he ran in the Dee Stakes, which while not being exceptional was good enough in a poor year, so he's another I'd argue didn't need to improve.
Of those Guineas winners how many can we be sure failed due to lack of stamina? Golan and Refuse To Bend were relatively poor Guineas winners anyway, King of Kings reportedly finished lame. Entrepreneur ran like a non stayer, even though before the season he'd been talked of more as a middle distance prospect, however, even when he was later returned to a mile he ran poorly and never recaptured his earlier form. |
|
By:
steamship with no backers for mars and magician u shud get value if getting a run which is very possable
|
|
By:
Derby hope Telescope only 50-50 to make Epsom after missing Dante
• Epsom fancy forced to miss Classic trial at York • Sir Alex Ferguson's part-owned colt out to 9-1 Chris Cook The Guardian, Tuesday 14 May 2013 18.45 BST Derby hope Telescope, right, is out to 9-1 with the bookmakers after being forced to miss the Dante Stakes. The chance of Telescope taking part in the Derby was assessed as no better than 50‑50on Tuesday night, following the dramatic news that he would take no part in Thursday's Dante Stakes at York. The colt, trained by Sir Michael Stoute, had been favourite for race, which is often the most significant trial race for the Classic, but Tuesday morning brought the news that his blood had been infected by minor grazes to two of his legs. The news counts as a blow to Sir Alex Ferguson in the week of his retirement from football, as he is a part-owner of the horse. "He was very philosophical about it," said Harry Herbert, whose Highclere company manages the syndicate that owns Telescope. "Obviously, like all of us, he's been looking forward to the horse running again all winter." Herbert explained that Telescope scraped two legs while being loaded into a horsebox "probably a couple of days ago, I don't know exactly when. It wasn't thought to be a serious problem at the time". But the horse could not be treated with anti-inflammatories so close to a race and then came the news that his blood had become infected. "It's in the lap of the gods now," Herbert said of the colt's chance of lining up in the Epsom classic on 1 June. "I suspect it's no better than 50‑50. We can do it but everything has to go absolutely right, there can't be any little thing that goes wrong. Any days lost now is just going to make it impossible." Herbert's hope is that Telescope's infection will clear fast enough to allow him to have a racecourse gallop at some point next week, barely in time to have him at his peak for the Derby a fortnight on Saturday. He described the injury as "minuscule in terms of the anatomy of a horse but these minusucle things can go the wrong way and it's gone the wrong way with Telescope at an absolutely appalling time. The agony of this is, it's so minor. "I feel desperately sorry for all Telescope's fans and for punters who have backed him ante-post for the Derby. Sir Michael will keep me informed and we'll take it day by day." If Telescope cannot be readied in time for Epsom, Herbert said the plan would become the King Edward VII Stakes at Royal Ascot on 21 June. "It's a wonderful race to go for but it's not the Derby and these horses don't come around very often." Telescope, who had been 6-1 third-favourite for the Derby on morning, is now 9-1 with conventional bookmakers or 6-1 'with a run'. He was trading at around 18-1 on Betfair night. The new Dante favourite is Indian Chief, available at 7-2 to give Aidan O'Brien his fifth victory in a recognised Derby trial within the space of a week. His seven rivals at York are led by Greatwood, owned by another Highclere syndicate, as well as Windhoek and Secret Number. Jim Bolger will send Trading Leather if the ground remains good or faster. Stoute can still salvage something from this week if his Liber Nauticus wins Musidora Stakes, an Oaks trial at York. The filly is 5-1 third-favourite for the Oaks a fortnight on Friday. |
|
By:
For what it is worth, DAWN APPROACH has RIBOT and SEA BIRDii in the female line
which appears to show a lack of stamina, those two horses lost ONE race between them and SEA BIRD was supposed to lack stamina before EPSOM and winning ARC by 6 lengths, classy or what? |
|
By:
Interesting that Ladbrokes are the only firm that aren't quoting Telescope , or Telescope With A Run... Considering they were the ones that pushed him out the other day. Probably nothing to it, but their opinion is clearly that he's a non runner.
|
|
By:
Stop believing Ladbrokes everyone!
Not that they're wrong just they're not definitive! Fascinating set of events re Telescope, only the most faithful backer can think he'll get there & win. The combination of his absence & the possibility of soft ground for the Dante has set the cat amongst the pigeons too. With Telescope running in the Dante & his elevated position in the market, one would presume him or whatever beat him would be a solid 2nd favourite to Dawn Approach. Now without him, we're left in a situation that Dawn Approach apart, no horse has posted a convincing, dominant Derby trial. All the winners so far have outclassed inferior fields and the Dante has lost a smidgeon of lustre due to Telescope's defection. Throw in the possibility of Trading Leather and Greatwood disliking soft ground or not even running & you've two other likely types who may not press claims this week. Suddenly you're severely lacking in numbers for Epsom & the Dante looks like a 10f race for 10f types. Which all leads me to worry, as I did the year New Approach won it, are things all falling into place for the Bolger horse? As it turned out New Approach was good enough but IIRC Aidan ran a few and they ambled around and never tested the Guineas winner's stamina as they should have. That is the only way that Dawn Approach can win this race, if indeed he has any chance of getting the 12f, which I doubt. So where do we go from here? Battle of Marengo, i've got pegged as a G2/3 type: solid consistant but lacking the turn of foot / brilliance required to win a Derby Ruler of the World; I like that he's compact & well balanced but has he the class & the ability to quicken? So what of Ocovango? Or out of left field the German horse, Chopin? Anyone want to tell me why Ocovango can win? |
|
By:
It's always dangerous to write off an unbeaten horse, I thought High-Rise's form was crap prior to him winning. Ocovango looks in the mould of most of Fabre's previous entries imo, and no Pour Moi.
|
|
By:
Hi Figgis/Sandown, hope you are both well. Do you have any views on Chopin out of interest?
|
|
By:
Personally I don't think Dawn Approach will stay the trip. Like most on here i backed him for the Guineas as I thought 2/1 over a mile was fair value. 6/4 over a mile and half doesn't represent fair value in my opinion.
In the Derrinstown Battle Of Marengo seemed to have a lack of pace like Fame and Glory and the head carriage of Recital. I wasn't impressed. Ruler of the World is possibly more of a Leger type. Magician looks Chantily bound if his price on the exchange for the Epsom Derby are anything to go by. I like Mars but he has only had two runs and think he has had his problems? I also don't get the same vibe about Ocovango like I did for Pour Moi. I just get the feeling that he's not top draw and his odds look pretty cramped now. I backed Greatwood last time and thought a potential Derby winner should have been able to pick up that Johnston horse, even over a slightly inadequate trip. So i think i'm only left with a few horses Indian Chief Secret Number Mars (if he runs) Trading Leather Chopin 3 of them are due to run in the Dante but the ground could be awful so not sure what will happen there |
|
By:
Hi Swagger, Chopin looks to have been winning impressively, but I don't really have a clue to the value of the form, sorry.
|
|
By:
Re Chopin. From the Telegraph:
On Monday, his retained jockey, Jamie Spencer, rode him in a gallop at Dusseldorf, the country’s most undulating track. “It was a good way to see how balanced he was and, though it was bit softer than he would have liked, he pleased us enormously,” said racing manager David Redvers. So we know he wants fast ground and will be ridden by Jamie Spencer, assuming they do not change their minds about supplementing him. And therein lies a problem because Spencer does not ride Epsom very well. |
|
By:
Aidan O'Brien must have been more impressed than most observers by the Derrinstown Derby Trial, as the betting on here suggests that most Ballydoyle trial winners will not be serious threats even if they turn up. Nevis 70; Magician 80; Mars 17; Ruler of the World 12. The latter two are short enough but still longer than the books. Of course, the market has been wrong before but we cannot ignore it completely.
I've backed Battle of Marengo after the Ballysax but the Derrinstown seemed disappointing, though I suppose the positives are that he showed he stays, and beat the best trial field (assuming Loch Garman ran to anything like his rating). |
|
By:
Swagger
A great mist has descended over this year's Derby field with too many known unknowns, let alone unknown unknowns, for comfort.Chopin is a great big known unknown. His price is very tight for a horse not yet supplemented (?) and whose form can't be measured against the English/Irish/French.We will have to wait for someone like Nick Mordin to pass judgement as he appears to have a line into German form. |
|
By:
Hard to tell how good Chopin is, although bar Dawn Approach you can still say that about most of the field. However, when the man who trained Lomitas says the horse is comparatively better at this stage of their careers, you should be pretty interested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yv4Cc9flrl8&noredirect=1 |