|
By:
..at least the winners market seems to be working correctly now..
|
|
By:
I want to go and make a sandwich..........but can't seem to take my ''eyes of the ball''
|
|
By:
iv layed out my posi on woods, gonna be toast me thinks .
|
|
By:
Just see bridey's post - I agree with him on this one.
|
|
By:
What are they saying xmoneyx??
|
|
By:
the stewards wont chuck him out
|
|
By:
tiger = viewers + spectators
no tiger = less money = tiger will stay in |
|
By:
norwichrob - it's not! lol
|
|
By:
can somebody answer my earlier question?
its either a disqualification or hes free to continue as you were at -3? he cant be penalised a shot now? |
|
By:
I think the crazy thing is that Tiger was allowed to play the ball from where he did, if he had marked the exact spot and taken his two clubs lengths,and then what he said in the interview afterwards would still have been within the rules, this can go either way, not as clear cut as Sky make it me thinks.
|
|
By:
3 shots off the lead, broke the rules facing DQ and still favourite. There's only one Tiger
|
|
By:
Winner market melting down
It just showed 7.0 back 3.9 lay woods |
|
By:
haha go back to the old site, its fine
|
|
By:
^been doing this all morning. 8.4 on day popping up too.
|
|
By:
Sned and Westy
![]() Lets hope Woods gets the bullett |
|
By:
Market has this around 2.5 the dq. Interesting.
|
|
By:
SCOM... It's either 3 under or disqualified. No other option.
|
|
By:
lol...it wont lay me though!
|
|
By:
keep him in, it's like winning the world hurdle without big bucks, nobody cares.
|
|
By:
My tuppence worth - they won't DQ someone unless the situation is absolutely unambiguous.
I think he gets the benefit of the doubt. |
|
By:
Got to chuck him out, they got no choice by imposing that penalty shot on the 14 year old plus for the future of the masters. They will lose the prestige the masters has got if they don't and what if woods retires with 6 masters after his career finishes!! Too much for Augusta to lose, got to nip it in the bud today for a week of debate instead a lifetime of debate.
|
|
By:
rules is rules, tiger is history for this years masters .
|
|
By:
** If woods was to win this masters
|
|
By:
a rules official on pga going to talk about incident a couple of mins--USA radio station
|
|
By:
First time I've ever started a thread that gets 8000 replies!
|
|
By:
Woods worrying about his morality! Now there's a laugh.
![]() |
|
By:
terrible tenant 13 Apr 13 12:28
keep him in, it's like winning the world hurdle without big bucks, nobody cares. As a Solwhit backer I do! ![]() |
|
By:
Well done for letting the cat out the bag,The Kitten
![]() |
|
By:
Sweetchild
It will be deemed DQ Once you have handed the card in with that score anything that happens herinafter that changes that score after it has been signed by player and marker is deemed incorrect. DQ is the only option in that case. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Imagine if there was a tree directly ahead of him and by dropping slightly behind where he should be dropping an advantage was gained (assuming same situation with water etc etc).
In reality he gained an advantage as he could play the exact same shot to the yardage that he wanted. Rather than play the yardage of the original shot. Its absolute cast iron |
|
By:
Tom Gorman---pga official 1/2 yds behind ball----the rule doesn't hav the exact distance so he thinks he's ok--USA radio
|
|
By:
He dropped two yards away from original pitch-mark it would appear then its DQF, no doubt.
Tiger's integrity for the sport suggests he will as graciously as possible disqualify himself for inadvertent rule breach and his position in golf history will be enhanced immeasurably. This would be more of a story for the history books and "legend of Tiger" than winning again this year.... and of course he'll be back next year. I have bet him and would rather he stays in but big odds on, he's out. |
|
By:
GOOD ENUFF FOR ME CHARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
By:
Have a thought for Wood's caddy.!!! Poor guy.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
USA radio saying woods will be ok
|
|
By:
what do they know
|
|
By:
20/5 ruling
|
|
By:
I would be laying the 6.6 Day if involved.
|
|
By:
basically saying the ruling isn't exact and tiger has leeway on USA radio
|