Golf
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1223 comments are related to the topic:
Woods could be disqualified!
Woods could be disqualified!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,223
|
By:
Tiger's integrity for the sport suggests he will as graciously as possible disqualify himself for inadvertent rule breach and his position in golf history will be enhanced immeasurably. This would be more of a story for the history books and "legend of Tiger" than winning again this year.... and of course he'll be back next year.
Woods didn't become the greatest play in history by disqualifying himself unnecessarily. |
|
By:
Has to be a DQ. He's effectively admitted that the choice to go further back was to improve the shot. Confusion, not foul play on Woods' part without doubt, but I would imagine he will be called infront of officials, admit his oversight, and be applauded off with an honourable dq.
|
|
By:
will this the same crowd making the ruling that didnt allow blacks and women not to become members at augusta?
|
|
By:
We will know the verdict when the committee hoovers all the prices before making an announcement.
|
|
By:
What station xmoney?
|
|
By:
of course it isn't u mug.
This decision has nothing to do with the bigots that are the Master's committee. |
|
By:
Be surprised if the committee can work a computer let alone a VPN and a betting exchange.
|
|
By:
Funny
|
|
By:
The Kitten LEGEND ...FACT !
|
|
By:
Graham Cunningham saying on twitter that the US press not picked up on the story yet.
|
|
By:
graham cunningham knows feck all about racing so i wouldn't rush to trust his golf judgement
|
|
By:
Short memories here,Vijay Singh did far far worse the year he won it and he did it deliberately.
|
|
By:
What did VJ do ,can't remember ?
|
|
By:
He isn't talking about the rights and wrongs of the ruling, just that the media haven't picked up on the story
|
|
By:
cunningham knows fook all about anything
|
|
By:
Almost 8 am in USA........committee having breakfast and telling the world to wait.
 |
|
By:
dave tindall on twitter has mentioned his serious bad language on telly ''im p!ssed'' but no mention of the minor event unfolding
|
|
By:
Watching him on the last 10 holes yesterday, his price now is about what it should be without a 50/50 chance he's DQ.
|
|
By:
Golf Channel just talking about the 14 year olds penalty, nothing about Tiger
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
So he probably dropped it 2 yards back...so he could play the exact same shot he played previously without any correction, and bounce it 2 yds short of the stick....after having viewd what that shot will result in.
|
|
By:
they send him out with arnie palmer as a marker
|
|
By:
love radio--newyork
saying rule doesn't state how far from ball--so he's ok |
|
By:
love radio :)
|
|
By:
Davis Love radio?
|
|
By:
A great authority on golf rulings
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
weight of money forcing him in to around 6.0, a long way from the 8.4 he was once..signs are improving
|
|
By:
Maybe the US media hasn't picked up on this because it's an overblown twitterverse non-story?
|
|
By:
not even discussing the potential issue on US media, so can you assume he is okay?
|
|
By:
I can see a know case to answer carry on tiger?
|
|
By:
AS IF THEY WILL THROW HIM OUT!!!
|
|
By:
I would fuc*in love that radio station if it right!! When are these yanks gonna get out of bed? They teed off at 1pm our time the last two days.
|
|
By:
Looks like Woods safe.......odds slowly dropping
|
|
By:
alot of bans coming up on this thread... load of racists on it
|
|
By:
Tiger.. "Did you knowingly drop your ball away from your original position ?"
Yes = see you next year , No = golf integrity questioned going forward |
|
By:
5.7
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
You can talk all you want about this but the fact is the rules were broke.
The United States Golf Association rule 26-1a states that a player must take their drop "as nearly as possible at the spot from which the original ball was last played". He did not place the ball "as nearly as possible" at the spot of the original. And in his interview he says he moved the ball back 2 yards which is an admission that he knew where the original was and that he therefore did not place the ball as near as possible. Whether they can get him off is another matter but he broke the rules and that should not be up for debate in my opinion. |