Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 457 comments are related to the topic:
New PC charges

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 12  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 12 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 457
By:
Just Checking
When: 28 Jun 11 14:59
Err .. because his charges are already > 20?
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 14:59
I'm not surprised eddie. whatever people think of the "morality" of this, i think in business terms it makes sense.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 15:04
scarecrow Joined: 26 Jan 05
Replies: 5135 28 Jun 11 14:58 
i feel so sorry for the people this will effect,i was caught in the net the first time they introduced pc and know what it feels like

-----------

I'm not sure I do. it's harder to feel sorry for someone who's 250K net up than a lot of the small players who were caught first time round. in fact, if they were going to do this and simultaneously significantly raise the 1K lifetime allowance, i think on balance I'd be in favour.
By:
-- Dark Horse --
When: 28 Jun 11 15:04
"Betfair shares are among the best performers on LSE today. Currently up 4 %"

There's none so blind as those who will not see
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:06
This new charge will bring in 100's of new high staking customers (NAP).
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:06
Sorry, meant to say accounts, not customers.
By:
layer1982
When: 28 Jun 11 15:08
lol FECK....
By:
aspy65
When: 28 Jun 11 15:09
surly players affected will just open a new account and pay the %20 pc till they get to 250k profit
By:
Googlebar
When: 28 Jun 11 15:11
FYI: Betfair's share price is moving around today because David Yu has announced that he will resign.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 15:12
the accounts would be linked for PC purposes aspy as they are now.

though the motivation to try and do that covertly will be admittedly greatly increased.
By:
Lex
When: 28 Jun 11 15:12
What surprises me is Betfair must realise how this thread (and the many more to follow ) will tell the world how bad Betfair has become.

Years ago we would have recommended them, and now? I doubt it. The foundation of 'winners welcome' and the difference between here and bookmakers is now truely gone.

I wonder what Andrew Black and Edward Wray really think of how their baby has changed.
By:
Just Checking
When: 28 Jun 11 15:14
"This new charge will bring in 100's of new high staking customers" .. to betduck.
By:
DStyle
When: 28 Jun 11 15:17
preciely aspy

i've just had a call and let my feelings be known.

i. i am sympathetic towards to the concept of a premium charge.

ii. i am sympathetic towards the introduction of sensibly graduated scale of the charge based on on net profit:commission ratio.

what i cannot accept in any way is that this charge is based on how much i have previously made.

as i said earlier, customers who have previously avoided the charge, and thus must have been considered profitable under a previous model, should now be charged and charged at a minimum double the previous charges.
By:
Gin
When: 28 Jun 11 15:17
Googlebar
28 Jun 11 15:11
Joined:
06 Sep 10
| Topic/replies: 3 | Blogger: Googlebar's blog
FYI: Betfair's share price is moving around today because David Yu has announced that he will resign.


That was announced yesterday and there was no real movement in the price. Look at a price chart of today and the price moved up a few % at eround 12.00 which incidentally when the PC charges announcement was made
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:21
Just Checking, read my follow up post ffs.
By:
STEPTOES YARD
When: 28 Jun 11 15:21
stock market loves anything that makes companies money at expense of public and consumers
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 15:22
the yu resignation's been more or less assumed for a while, so I think it was probably already factored into the price.
By:
Eddie the eagle
When: 28 Jun 11 15:24
But this will lead to lower profits long term.
  I said it on another thread, but will say it again .
If you have any spare money to invest , go short in Betfair shares.
  Absolutely no way this can be good for Betfair long term.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:25
The absence of a sliding scale is madness but it also seems strange to treat someone who's made 25K a year for 10 years the same as someone who's making a million a month.
By:
Just Checking
When: 28 Jun 11 15:26
"Just Checking, read my follow up post ffs."
I did of course, calm down dear. It was very drole.
And I was pointing out that, in addition to the route of not getting stung for an additional 40% by opening a second account (which would of course be frowned upon), betfair have in one troke a significantly stronger incentive for people with big wallets to just move to betduck.
By:
DStyle
When: 28 Jun 11 15:27
i don't think the volume of money made is in any way relevant. it's exclusively about the commission:net profit rate.
By:
scarecrow
When: 28 Jun 11 15:27
feck even in normal work the ones making the most all live in switzerland,iom or monaco its always the poor s ods in the middle ground who get mullered Sad
By:
Just Checking
When: 28 Jun 11 15:27
"one [S]troke created" should say.
I'll read my posts before clicking once Ryanfair start taxing us for them :)
By:
DStyle
When: 28 Jun 11 15:29
say i'm a heavy telephone user, and my operator introduces new rates, can they charge me more based on my previous behaviour at greater rates for exactly the same behaviour as a new user?

it has to be based on current behaviour entirely independently of previous behaviour.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 15:31
Eddie the eagle Joined: 01 Feb 04
Replies: 3549 28 Jun 11 15:24 
But this will lead to lower profits long term.

----------

I'm not sure it will eddie.

there are basically only two things that matter to BF:

1) how much new money comes into the exchange
2) what proportion of that money ends up belonging to them and what proportion is withdrawn by third parties.

anyone affected by this change almost by definition puts no new money into the pot. therefore the only danger is, will their reaction to this somehow affect what others put in?

if other players (or BF themselves) replace the liquidity, and those who leave don't create a credible competitor (the main risk involved in this decision imo), then in strictly business terms it's a good move.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:35
Apologies JC.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:39
I've heard around 60% of horse racing liquidity is down to little more than a handful of people. Presumably they must all already be on or near those marks because, if they're not, it's hard to see how betfair will replace that liquidity and their defection to the purple would see a lot of people following them.
By:
Just Checking
When: 28 Jun 11 15:40
No probs FNE. I know you must be a bit techy as they didn't implement your system Devil
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:40
LOL JC.
By:
layer1982
When: 28 Jun 11 15:40
Ok so who wants to make a credible competitor??? It will take money and time, but will pay off in the long term.... Maybe work in alliance with an already operational exchange.
By:
Mr.Anderson
When: 28 Jun 11 15:44
I can see this leading to players who still are far away from 250k, but who might get there in a few years time, taking part of their betting activity elsewhere. Betting on other exchanges whenever liquidity allows in order to put off the time they get to 250k.
By:
five leaves left
When: 28 Jun 11 15:48
The 250K profit figure won't last long (nap)
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 28 Jun 11 15:51
I agree with that FLL. They'll have to introduce it to everyone just to combat duplicate accounts.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 15:54
BF to buy the purple NAP
By:
Bayes.
When: 28 Jun 11 15:54
Mental. Only with Betfair can you lose 30% of your income and find out via a forum.
By:
Latalomne
When: 28 Jun 11 15:56
Just had the call.  Felt a bit sorry for the fella doing the ringing around TBH.  Talk about being on a hiding to nothing.
By:
Alexandru
When: 28 Jun 11 15:58
I am a 40% payer and cannot find another solution except creating a new account and bet will you're 250k again.  Otherwise, I'll just have to stop betting with BF. In my opinion, it is a clear message, that I am not welcome to BF.  Just crazy!
By:
HarnessFan
When: 28 Jun 11 16:00
I have a question:-

If your lifetime pattern is 4% commission and they alocate me a 60% premium charge, can you change your pattern to go to as 11% commission and therefore revert to a 40% premium charge (despite a long historiy of winning).

As I understand it the 10% commission will more or less come off the premium charge anyway. So this amount is not added to premium charge in terms of overall fees.

My guess is they still tally up commission from a lifetime perspective and it would take a long time budge from 4%.

Cheers
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 28 Jun 11 16:01
wait...

Customers will be subject to Premium Charges at higher rates if they satisfy all of the following conditions:
Lifetime net profits (gross profits less commission paid and Premium charges debited) exceed £250,000
Lifetime commission generated less than 40% of lifetime gross profits

is that an error, or are they actually switching to commission paid rather than generated?
By:
Eddie the eagle
When: 28 Jun 11 16:02
Alexandru, I think you will find that it's very hard to get around the charge by opening new accounts.
  You would need to use another persons name and bank account, a totally new static ip-address preferably linked to this new users name and address, a new computer and probably even more things I don't know about.
Page 5 of 12  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 12 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com