|
By:
I dont know why people are so affraid of success.
I would have believed you. I know of 6 people who have made in excess of £2m in 10 yrs on Bf. The problem is - writing about it. There is little to really gain - and lots to lose. The only major thing I really regret, is that, the early 'winners' on Bf, have and probably will never be given the place in the sun, they rightly deserve. Some of the intellectual property developed in the first 3 yrs, has never been written about, and thats a shame. Its sad I have to end on a defensive note .. but for the trolls - if anyone doubts you can make £2m, I have yr by yr records, showing every bet. One yr, I made £600k. If anyone wants to verify the data - and the file is 58000 lines of excel, it will cost u £10k. |
|
By:
Don't worry about the things that haven't been written about. They will be.
An ongoing (over decades, maybe even centuries) theme in the gambling world is that someone or some group finds an edge, exploits it, wins well from it, gets stopped from doing it, gives it a cooling off period, then writes about it. I don't see why Betfair will be any different. I'd imagine the first (decent not spammy) books will be out 10 years from now. Even as someone who's been a lowly grinder for much of my existence I've thought about a book several times, and there are far more interesting people than me on here who have done far more pioneering work. Some of those will surely step up. One of the great pains in gambling has always been not being able to tell everyone how great you are. (or at least get feedback to see if what you were doing was as clever as you thought it was). Smart Money and Moneyball were both written out of this "problem". Sadly Smart Money is utter drivel, while Moneyball nearly gives the keys away. |
|
By:
[i]I've always been a big advocate of having a proper income away from betting as it takes the pressure off having to win, like a salesman who has a basic salary and doesn't have to rely on commision alone.
[/i] I'm not disagreeing that having another source of income takes the pressure off, but I've also thought that great people don't become great without dedicating 100% to their chosen profession e.g. Musicians etc. I suspect that Gambling is the same. We can all grind out small edges and be profitable over time, but to be truely get to the top only those giving everything will succeed. |
|
By:
One thing I liked about making your living punting on the racecourse pre-Betfair was how you had to do everything possible to convince the ring you were a losing mug.
The few long-term pros were the ones moaning to each other beside the pre-parade ring after each race about their bad luck, how they were already a grand down and how they should have gone to Sedgefield, not Newbury. They dressed like scarecrows and when they did have a winner they never had enough on. The only punters boasting of profits, suits and stable lifestyles were the ones trying to get credit on the rails. |
|
By:
Hilarous screaming. Brings back similar memories.
Blackjack was almost identical. Some of the stories I've told and heard told were brilliant. The guy I know who gambled away his in heritance was hilarious (Given that I knew he was winning a fortune). All the dealers feeling sorry for him and slaggging him off behind his back while he's raking in the cash ![]() Sadly with the poker boom a lot of the character went out of the industry, and I'm sure it's the same in the horse racing game. Some great aspects to the new way of doing things, but I was always a sucker for listening and watching people doing their thing and telling their stories the old way. |
|
By:
Some of the charcters of old, have been replaced, by - lets call them, greasers,twitchers,pixel men,furlong-pole men, fast pic men etc.
But, these stories, will take a while before getting into the mainstream. There are some new terms, that I am not sure have made the main stream. One of my favs, is the 'Eamon Andrews' - referring to the 'Big Red Book' .. which, traders, occasionally may experience. |
|
By:
Some of the racecourse bookies played the same game.
One West Country layer once spent the entire hour and a half it took him to give me a lift back from Hereford listing every losing race he'd ever suffered, every near-miss, every inspired gamble that had floored him, every shrewdie who had out-thought him, every paddock negative which had hosed up. "D'you know something? I've been unlucky me whole life." I sympathized as I settled deeper into the leather upholstery of the gigantic Merc he was driving and thought about the acres to which he was returning and the string of racehorses he had owned and bred. |
|
By:
Hello Dr J,
Excellent OP and some good points and observations, However i would take issue with you slightly re:- Naturally, you need discipline to make this game work. But after a while discipline becomes habit. I used to take the view that having nine or ten profit-making months per year was fine, but then I realised that this kind of thinking was making me complacent. I now do all I can to finish every month in profit, and this month will (hopefully) be my 11th consecutive profit-making one. Surely being disciplined means being able to accept the inevitable losing month and a determination to gain a profit could be seen as chasing losses imo, if as it seems you have got an edge, stick with it and enjoy. Look forward to your £300k milestone post, good luck. |
|
By:
A losing month is not inevitable for everyone.
There are people that make a profit every month without exception, although in my opinion many of them are not taking on an optimal level of risk. |
|
By:
Surely being disciplined means being able to accept the inevitable losing month and a determination to gain a profit could be seen as chasing losses imo,
Hi Bentley. Yes, you're quite right, and yours is the approach the I took for many years. However, what works best for me now is aiming to make every month a profit-making one. I'm not advocating this for everyone, nor do I think it maximises my long-term profits, but I find it works best with my particular way of life and particular way of betting. Horses for courses, and other cliches. Look forward to your £300k milestone post, good luck. Much appreciated. |
|
By:
A losing month is not inevitable for everyone.
There are people that make a profit every month without exception, although in my opinion many of them are not taking on an optimal level of risk. Spot on!....over 40 years of punting & I'm still timid ![]() |
|
By:
thinly disguised attempt at smugness
![]() |
|
By:
themanmarcus - not smugness, more self criticism. I make consistent profit from trading but I'm happy to admit that if I was an outright backer/layer I would likely make considerable more dosh, I see the figures its just that I'm not happy working it that way which is why I identified with The Investor's post - hats off to the OP!
|
|
By:
Yep, Investors post rings true to me. Staking relative to optimal risk is something I know will be incredibly difficult for me to get to.
|
|
By:
Me too, but how on earth to you find your optimal level of risk? Nice words as they are, but how do they cater for outages for example?
|
|
By:
'Optimal Risk' - sounds like a corny sci fi villain
.Seriously though, regardless of profit, do you not find betting, if you were full time, would/can have antisocial hours? I.e. : most sporting events in europe take place outwith working hours, so therefore if you are betting on them, and obviously in play, you'll tend to be 'working' during other peoples 'free' time? Would the solution be to move to a timezone that would make your working hours = betting hours [smiley:crazy] :) |
|
By:
Sorry to go back so far on the thread but I thought this post was one of the most important:
These days, I select my races first thing in the morning, bet on them intermittently, and switch off my computer when the last one finishes. It definitely suits me better. That's not discipline that is a skill in itself and can't be taught. It's like the person in the office coming in at weekends to do extra hours, they're impressing no one and getting nothing extra for but it makes them feel involved. Have your bet and walk away should always be the way. |
|
By:
Just Checking... South America / Central America ;)
|
|
By:
Just Checking - Yes, the hours are antisocial but 10 years ago I used to be a Cinema Manager with weekend finishes of 3am. Sometimes there would be a 2pm start the next day so you don't get much antisocial than that.
|
|
By:
Congrats Dr J. Thats a big milestone. £250,000 will be another. I think we have a lot in common. My profits are approx £35K shy of yours. I think mentorship is a big advantage! Keep up the good work.
|
|
By:
You need to dedicate yourself to betting full-time to make the really decent money. Patience, discipline allied to a value approach and contrarian angles is for me the secret to decent profits, always investigating and exploiting angles the crowd doesn't consider...great stuff Dr J...hope your good run continues and you post up some more on your progress.
|
|
By:
You don't need to be full-time to make decent money. You can do that part-time and keep the benefits of a regular job and all that goes with it. This is more true if you are in a career rather than in a dead-end job on minimum wage, but there are many good reasons to think very carefully before giving up a job to trade full-time.
http://green-all-over.blogspot.com/2011/04/proper-income.html |
|
By:
The main reason to give up a job and gamble full time is to wangle out of doing an honest day's work.
|
|
By:
Seriously though, I'm full time and have a different way of keeping the pressure off:
A) low living expenses B) Huge cash reserves (relative to living expenses) C) average profit from betting that is many multiples of what I 'need' to live on. Massive losses can hurt me, but that is the same for most people. If I make very little for a long period of time, it's not a problem in terms of being able to pay bills etc. and I'd have plenty of time to figure out whether to move onto something else. |
|
By:
MANY DREAMERS ON THIS THREAD
|
|
By:
MANY DREAMERS ON THIS THREAD
Perhaps, but one hopes that they might be inspired by this post and the success of the OP, The Investor and others who give solid advice and are evidence that it is possible to be a long-term winner on the exchanges. |
|
By:
A footnote to the above...
I penned the OP when I was about £3.5k in profit for April and had therefore pushed my all-time profit over £200k with over £1k to spare. I was premature. The final few days of April were a nightmare for me (possible reasons to follow) and I ended the month £5.5k down. It hurts because I've staked a great deal of emotional capital on building up a run of consecutive winning months. April should have my 11th. Now I'm back to zero. What went wrong was a cocktail of misfortune and complacency (which is basically what's gone wrong whenever anyone has had a bad run, ever, so it's probably a very studid thing to type.). The misfortune involved a matter of milimetres (in race after race) over a three day period. The complacency involved continuing to bet when I probably should have taken a day off. I don't think I was chasing losses, but for all my platitudes about discipline becoming a habit, I was still vulnerable to going in heavier than I should. Petit Margot's win at Ayr cost me several thousand pounds (though I was still able to raise a glass to the old mare a few hours later - it's not the first time she's confounded me). I've made a good start to May and am aiming to break the £200k milestone (again) very soon. I'll post my year-end stats in December for anyone who's interested. (cpfc4me - I've only had a quick skim of your blog so far, but it looks terrific. Thanks for the link.) |
|
By:
*Perth, not Ayr.
|
|
By:
Seems your edge is not as scientific as I first thought Dr J - these '2 losing months' also got me thinking................ !!
Commend you on your honesty in your last post and no doubt you have something..... but I now see a real weakness - and maybe you have to convince that your edge has been tested sufficiently over enough events However, hope you hit the £300K and all the best for the future. |
|
By:
2009 I made a profit 51 out of 52 weeks (One losing week in December finished a 52 week winning streak)
2010 I had 3 losing months and the year was well below expectation for me, but net profit was 1.33x that of 2009. |
|
By:
And July / August 2010 was the first and only time I had two consecutive losing months.
|
|
By:
Sorry to hear of your run of bad results. It is always difficult to clear milestones. Stick to your strengths and you will get back over 200K. I had a similar tough period in late March early April but glad to say I have got over it for now. It was a run off annoying results and unlucky events. Eg horse beaten at 1.32 when I was laying it at 1.31 etc etc.
|
|
By:
Yeah, I got my PC down from £8k in 2009 to £1k in 2010.
Paid £3.4k in Jan 2011 though, as I had an amazing month, then had a big loss in Feb and small profit in March. For the first quarter I paid 95% of GP in commission and a further 71% in PC, so Betfair got 166% of my profit. Ended up -£3k on Betfair and +£6k with other bookies for a £3k profit overall for the quarter. For Q1 2011 GP Comm PC £4,768 £4,531 £3,383 |
|
By:
The good news is that I can now make loads before PC kicks in again. Provided I ever pay PC again, all that has happened is that I have effectively 'pre-paid' PC for future profit.
|
|
By:
On another thread I recently wrote about how I had managed to wipe out three months worth of average profit in one race. A bad choice of bet in the first place, followed by an error, followed by inaction (I could have traded out of a dreadful position but didn't). I have noticed since then that my betting activity has been abnormally high. Am I chasing? Perhaps. A bit.
The worst thing about keeping note of good betting runs is that we are setting up artificial hurdles for ourselves. We are creating a difficulty that should not exist. If I am getting close to a personal best run of correct lays the urge to beat that total becomes a factor in choosing my next selection. It should not be. If I am getting close to a nice round number in terms of profit such as £200K ( I wish ) again it affects my judgement where it never should. Similarly with setbacks like the one I recently had. Something in the back of my mind tells me that I don't deserve to be in this position as it was an abnormal action that put me there. I deserve to be back on track. This is foolish thinking and leads to foolish betting. The thing to do of course is to treat each and every bet on its own merits. To heck with running totals. To heck with good and bad runs. They are problem makers, not problem solvers. Easier said than done though. |
|
By:
'but I now see a real weakness - and maybe you have to convince that your edge has been tested sufficiently over enough events'
the guy has won £200K in 7+ years and some nugget comes out with that. He doesnt have to convince anyone, mate..he was being good enough to share his experiences. |
|
By:
Just out of interest have you noticed any repeating patterns on months you do well in and months you do poorly in.
Yes, and I've been silly to overlook these patterns. Springtime is always my difficult period and April the cruelest month. I suspect the start of the flat season catches me off guard. When a horse hasn't run for a few months, inside info becomes exponentially more valuable and form studentship less so. I need to bet less at the time of year, maybe take a holiday. but I now see a real weakness - and maybe you have to convince that your edge has been tested sufficiently over enough events Well, it's one losing month, not two, and it's my first losing month since May of last year. So I'm not going to panic just yet! Your broader point is well made though. 7.5 years probably isn't long enough to convince that at edge is bombproof. But how long is? It is always difficult to clear milestones. I bloody hate milestones. They really mess with your head. It's completely irrational to change the way you bet simply because you have one lurking, but I know that's what I always do! |
|
By:
Would you mind me asking Dr, what size of stake you would put on as an average at what price. Your profits pre baby, part time are excellent imo, but as a layer approx how many bets would you lay in one day?
|
|
By:
Am I chasing? Perhaps. A bit.
Sorry to hear about your big loss, topnag1. Chasing is a bit like being pregnant though. You either are or you aren't. And it sounds like you are, if you don't mind my saying. The worst thing about keeping note of good betting runs is that we are setting up artificial hurdles for ourselves. We are creating a difficulty that should not exist. Fascinating logic, and pleasingly contrarian. The accepted wisdom is that record-keeping is essential to successful punting, but maybe there are times when we focus too much on meaningless targets, milestones and personal bests? Something in the back of my mind tells me that I don't deserve to be in this position as it was an abnormal action that put me there. I deserve to be back on track. This is foolish thinking and leads to foolish betting. With that kind of self-awareness you're likely to be back making good profits very soon, imo. The killer word is 'deserve'. None of us think we deserve bad luck. The danger comes when you start expecting the Gods of Fortune to redress the balance, like you're somehow 'owed' a nice pay-out. It may seem daft for any serious gambler to ever contemplate thinking this way, but there's a little part of it in all of us, I reckon. To heck with running totals. To heck with good and bad runs. They are problem makers, not problem solvers. ![]() |
|
By:
Hi stewarts,
I'll lay at any price (though I rarely venture over 25-1) and my stake depends on my level of confidence and the odds I can lay at. My maximum exposure is almost always under £2k per race. My average is much lower still, maybe three or four hundred. Yesterday I bet on a dozen races (broke even); today I'll bet on none. You? |