|
By:
Will be interesting to see what happens to their relatioship now hes been dropped by Man Utd. if he doesnt find another club willing to take him, and he stops being her 'cash cow', whether she will still see him in the same light?
|
|
By:
Nobody coming out if this well.
I think it is also difficult for his team mates who mostly shunned him immediately without knowing the gills facts He does probably have to go but a big mea culpa. I’s sorry some time ago may have helped and he should have alluded to that us the way they play it in their bedroom. Trouble is she went to the police and could be charged with blackmail, extortion or wasting police time! Send them both to Saudi! |
|
By:
Absolutely Wes, so you are happy with Mendy's innocence now that he's been cleared in court, yes?
|
|
By:
Yes Wes
Mandy was ashley found Not Guilty in Court! Say it loud Wes Mendy is INNOCENT ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Of course.
I've no idea why suggest I wouldn't be. You're comparing apples with oranges here. Mendy - accused of multiple rapes with gold digging wannabees looking for a WAG lifestyle; using he said/she said allegations. Greenwood - in a long term allegedly abusive/coercive relationship given credence by revelations on social media. Chalk & cheese. |
|
By:
Presumably O.J was innocent too ad presumably all the anti Greenwood brigade would all be changing their view if he was found not guilty in court, unfortunately for Greenwood though, his case didn't even reach the threshold to warrant a day in court, as a result of which he can be assumed guilty without any redress legally.
It's a strange world we currently inhabit. |
|
By:
Wesdag;
'given credence by revelations on social media[. Just what exactly does that mean please? |
|
By:
A lot of people struggling with the concept of the presumption of innocence.
|
|
By:
grenwood and utd are free to put the evidence in public domain,that they say would clear him and presumably leave him free to stay at utd, the same rules will apply to him going to any club in the uk,if him and his partner go to saudi they,d be a laughing stock so would utd,especialy if qatari,s buy utd
|
|
By:
The OJ case is a bit different in that you had TWO dead bodies in the mix so something definitely happened. Not a simple he said/she said scenario.
With Greenwood, evidence of abusive/coercive relationships is difficult to prove but when compelling evidence is put into the public domain, then the public quite can rightly form an opinion. The fact that the case wasn't pursued is irrelevant - most cases of this kind aren't because victims usually doesn't see themselves as victims. Bottom line, MG has only got himself to blame. If his missus set him up, then find a new missus. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
pics that alleged battery
|
|
By:
Very hard to prove you are not guilty.
Just talking about crime makes folk think you done it. Look at this thread, folk seen same evidence and making stuff fit, but totally differing scenarios. There is clearly a bit of fire... We have not seen it.. And a lot of smoke, that we have seen. Make up your own minds they say |
|
By:
The truth of the matter and it points to the current world we live in is EVEN IF he went to court and was found not guilty the very same circus would be following him around afterwards, the Rachael Riley's of this world would still be shouting the same stuff. Only perhaps the most stringent idealists with regards to having your day in court among those who are currently against him would change that view.
|
|
By:
The club have clearly made the right decision in this matter.
|
|
By:
2 consenting adults
both apparently nothing to hide getting married allegedly having a family allegedly, club righting off a large asset player ripping up a large contract you,d have to either have the iq of a rocking horse or telling porkie pies not to go public with everything you have to clear your name, nothings gone/going away same ?,s will be asked by and at any new club |
|
By:
|
|
By:
But Riley is not shouting about Antony
And makes no apology for her love of giggs. That's why it's wrong, she's just jumped on this media wave to boost her self promotion. Should it ever get out that she's fed answers on countdown I doubt any body would care. |
|
By:
he wont sort out a move by end of window,so leaves a loan move meaning utd will be paying some of the wages and keeping an asset theyve disowned today,unless they sack him and give up on any transfer money
|
|
By:
Shes no mathematician yhtl
I doubt she could do simple algebra, she looks like shes getting it fed through a ear piece as she writes it down, shes pausing and waiting for the next bit etc Shes thick when it comes to even basic maths in my opinion |
|
By:
They won't sack him as they'd be in breach of employment law I'd imagine -
pretty sure they won't be looking for a fee either. |
|
By:
Wesdag 21 Aug 23 17:53
He would need to prove the audio which suggested abuse & coercion plus the photos were faked. Wouldn't you do that if it meant saving your career & reputation? If not in court but to the world at large? Have you considered that by doing so it would mean exposing the girl and letting the wold see her in a disturbing light and it could be this, his protection of her that we may be seeing played out here. It would be a highly noble act on his part wouldn't it. Incidentally I wouldn't use the word fake as such, my whole issue of the excerpts are they are just that, we don't know what went before or after or the context, we've just dropped in and heard a partial part of the story. |
|
By:
Benn outed,so does anyone have to pay a fee for him?
Must be a fee agent,surely. |
|
By:
how longs left on his contract ?
|
|
By:
still a Man Utd employee at this point but not being brought back in to the footballing fold at the club -
club has stated they intend to help him find a new club. |
|
By:
They've said the transfer fee will go to charity
according to journo. |
|
By:
sounds plausible but who's going to risk the fee..one thing taking him on loan or a short term contract from a free ..
no one in the EPL I'd guess..he's still got 2 years left on his contract @ 75k a week I think was quoted so in Utd's interest to move on and obviously have no leverage for fee... |
|
By:
Whover get's him will be getting a very good player.
|
|
By:
if they dont sack him he can sit still get 75k a week and be on a free ,
fee+75 grand a week for a player utd wont play,utd cant even get rid of maquire ,how they going to help greenwood get a club,more chance of fergie selling dalglish a virus |
|
By:
you'd imagine Mason is quite keen to play...Harry seems to have decided he quite likes the padded seats these days...
if they can't facilitate a move would most likely just make a financial settlement with him and then he and his agent would have to do all the work...can see him him playing professionally again in less sensitive parts of the world...not as though he has a criminal record to my knowledge... |
|
By:
duffy • August 21, 2023 6:01 PM BST
Have you considered that by doing so it would mean exposing the girl and letting the wold see her in a disturbing light and it could be this, his protection of her that we may be seeing played out here. It would be a highly noble act on his part wouldn't it. If that's what might've happened then he'd be the biggest mug of all time. Binning his career so some airhead can save face? ![]() |
|
By:
man utd seem to be saying we did the police,s job for them and found evidence they didnt find
|
|
By:
He might find a club abroad
As said Saudi is his best bet, but Somewhere like Portugal? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Utd have just taken a commercial decision...1TP..
having seen all the circus surrounding it they'd rather not risk the baggage that now comes with him as a player.. |
|
By:
They'd literally layed all the ground work for his return according to many credible sources...and have made an abrupt u-turn having heard the noise around him...
|
|
By:
so utds investigations started out with the intent of finding a way to get him back in squad, bit like putting thefox in charge of the hen house, one could say they had a 100 million reasons for finding the right answers to the ? they were asking
|