Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 503 comments are related to the topic:
VAR is becoming ridiculous with things like this happening !

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 7 of 13  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 13 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 503
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 12 Nov 19 15:32
Stay *
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 12 Nov 19 15:34
It would not be difficult to implement the changes needed to get the best out of it but i doubt we will get them as far too much common sense required to kick start it
By:
geordie1956
When: 12 Nov 19 15:42
Common sense and the administrators ... next Sad
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 12 Nov 19 15:54
Yep. Agreed, Cry
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 12 Nov 19 15:56
They have a great tool at their disposal but if you try to pick a lock with a sledgehammer you will only get a mess similar to what we currently have.
By:
Charlton2005
When: 12 Nov 19 16:58
good points
By:
roache
When: 12 Nov 19 18:04
The problem with the Premier league VAR is that they have to follow the protocol laid down by FIFA with regards to how VAR is used and interpreted and that is why they draw these silly inaccurate lines across the pitch trying to catch a toe offside,i have lost count of the numerous times i saw goals chalked off last season in the German,Spanish and Italian leagues when a toe,nose,hand was millimetres offside as they have been using it since the beginning of the previous season, i lay the blame entirely at FIFA's door as IFAB created the new handball rules and FIFA implemented VAR policy to be followed by the national associations,you just knew when football came to use new technology they would make a complete and utter mess of it unlike cricket,Rugby and the NFL
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 13 Nov 19 13:43
They seem to go out of their way to rule out goals. Every effort is made to somehow show any part of the body is offisde from one angle or another if you use the most helpful freeze frame image. The freeze-frame/lines are so inaccurate and so open to manipulation/interpretation that its almost could be a system custom designed to be inaccurate. Anyone with an ounce of technical ability could make these images show any decision to be correct, on top of that the process is entirely opaque so it can't be challenged by anyone outside of EPL's Comedy Bunker.

Football is not and never will be a suitable game for VAR, it should have never gone beyond GLT. I remember in the 1990's having a discussion at work about GLT and I said even if it worked perfectly I would be against it for one reason, it would open Pandora's box for the use of technology in football, and here we are. But even I never imagined anything as horrific as this, quite apart from the utter disaster it has been with regard to decisions it has ruined football as a spectacle, the spontaneity of a goal has been completely lost while some minions in a bunker spend 5 minutes trying to work out that someones 5 o'clock shadow was offside or not. It ruins the flow of games and so much time is lost and never added on.

FIFA have been slowly poisoning the game for years, and the game now lies at death's door. What can save it?
By:
pumphol.
When: 13 Nov 19 14:04
Firstly the game lost it's soul with ridiculous wages & now its looks like losing it's sanity with VAR.
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 13 Nov 19 17:37

Nov 12, 2019 -- 12:27PM, GoBallistic wrote:


By far the biggest variable with the offsides (and the reason it is subjective, not objective as some claim) is when to freeze the frame.  Test 10 different VAR operators and there is no way they will all freeze at the same frame. Quite often it's nothing much more than a guess because the foot is obscured by a player or the ball itself, or the angle is not side-on, and it can make well over a yard of difference because of the speed that everything moves.TV producers can be well off on this also.  The freeze frame on the Salah goal shown on TV which "proved" it was onside was late imo (even allowing that it should be when the ball leaves the foot rather than when it first contacts).  We weren't shown the official VAR review of this anyway (if indeed there was one)


The error rate due to freeze frame is supposedly 30cm. How on earth they're allowed to give offside when it's offside by a toenail or armpit, when the error rate is 30cm is beyond me.

By:
GoBallistic
When: 13 Nov 19 19:55
30cm sounds about right for potential difference between attacker and defender running in opposite directions if you take two consecutive frames (assuming there are 50 frames per second).  Back of a **** packet - two players in different directions running at 8m/s (not usain bolt speed) = 16m apart per second or 32cm between frames.  I reckon there are likely to be many examples (when there is not a good side-on view) where there are more than 2 frames to choose from where it could appear that the ball is being played.

A VAR operator knows that choosing the early frame makes it onside and choosing the later frame makes it offside. What a lovely choice to have, especially when nobody is any the wiser since there is always a frame on your side.
By:
roache
When: 13 Nov 19 21:38
FIFA believe everything is black or white onside or offside and there are no grey areas,absolutely crazy not to build in any margin of error like cricket has done or to stick with the principle of a clear and obvious error,Amateurs running the worldwide game but as long as they keep raking in the cash at Zurich towers why should they care.
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 14 Nov 19 20:26

Nov 13, 2019 -- 7:55PM, GoBallistic wrote:


30cm sounds about right for potential difference between attacker and defender running in opposite directions if you take two consecutive frames (assuming there are 50 frames per second).  Back of a **** packet - two players in different directions running at 8m/s (not usain bolt speed) = 16m apart per second or 32cm between frames.  I reckon there are likely to be many examples (when there is not a good side-on view) where there are more than 2 frames to choose from where it could appear that the ball is being played. A VAR operator knows that choosing the early frame makes it onside and choosing the later frame makes it offside. What a lovely choice to have, especially when nobody is any the wiser since there is always a frame on your side.


Yes of course, very good point. It's an error up to 30cm rather than simply 30cm.

But you also make a good point about where to freeze. Cricket has the same problem regards run outs, but use the on-field decision as a base and find a reason to overturn; if the freeze frame is unclear to overturn then they stick with on-field. Offside particularly could follow the same principal.

By:
roache
When: 16 Nov 19 21:58
Isn't it great football without VAR spoiling it,instant decisions no fannying around,crowd spontaneity of a true goal without the after thought of it being stolen from you .
By:
Rider
When: 16 Nov 19 22:11
not a great fan of european internationals because there are too many games that are mismatches etc but it does make you realise how much better football is without VAR, no endless stoppages and knowing a goal stands straight away, they need to just get rid of it completely and accept mistakes will be made but its a price worth paying
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 17 Nov 19 12:24
It's not infested the SA leagues I enjoy - yet. No doubt that won't last forever, and football will be ruined there too. I'm making the most of it.
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 17 Nov 19 12:24
It's not infested the SA leagues I enjoy - yet. No doubt that won't last forever, and football will be ruined there too. I'm making the most of it.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 30 Nov 19 19:24
var not spotting handball on southampton equaliser
By:
FIGJAM
When: 01 Dec 19 10:07
The Spurs one as far as I know wasn't even reviewed and over looked on MOD.
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 01 Dec 19 19:07
So the Leicester winner today was fine but the similar one that was ruled offside before the international break wasn't ?

Inaucho looked almost off there, but they he wasn't passed the made up line they create

It really does make the mind boggle
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 01 Dec 19 19:10

Nov 16, 2019 -- 10:11PM, Rider wrote:


not a great fan of european internationals because there are too many games that are mismatches etc but it does make you realise how much better football is without VAR, no endless stoppages and knowing a goal stands straight away, they need to just get rid of it completely and accept mistakes will be made but its a price worth paying


But its not really used for getting rid of mistakes not in the prem anyway

That Leicester goal today could have easily been chalked off but 10 points is a growing lead at the top and might put off the neutrals watching for xmas period because Liverpool are so far ahead

So the goal stands for that alone in my opinion, can't have us thinking its all done and dusted

Agreed just get rid, but they wont do that now, they can control big moment and big matches, must be like being god ffs

By:
Emitdeb
When: 02 Dec 19 15:28
Alan Brazil whining on Talksport this morning, about the late Leicester VAR goal.. Saying he'd rather have some human error!  CrazyCrazy  WHY???
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 02 Dec 19 17:18
I'd sooner have the human error emitdeb

That was so close it should have stayed with on field call
By:
Emitdeb
When: 02 Dec 19 18:08
Honestly cant get my head around that point of view...

If its a legal goal, let it stand.. Why rule out a good goal? ConfusedConfused
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 02 Dec 19 18:26
Because VAR ruled out one before the international break under very similar circumstances

Its basically good one minute bad the next
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 02 Dec 19 21:35
bet preston wish there was var
By:
lurka
When: 02 Dec 19 21:36
was just about to say the same
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 02 Dec 19 21:43
really poor decision there , never a pen
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 02 Dec 19 21:51
VAR still has human error just with 4 minute delays, chaos and a lack of passion in the game.
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 02 Dec 19 22:03
VAR probably would have given it as well

If they want a pen they are giving a pen its that simple

Conning ref angle or conning VAR angle (after 5 minutes analysing every angle) ?

I'd sooner the ref gets the blame and we move on
By:
Deepdale Dreamer
When: 03 Dec 19 12:47
VAR would have realised in seconds yesterday that the ref had been conned. Lets see if the EFL have any balls to ban the cheat & WBA to fine him as well. They'll keep getting away with it unless action is taken.
By:
snowynoon
When: 04 Dec 19 10:56
no action taken against WBA player ,so a clear message to all players .....carry on cheating and trying to con the referee ,it might work ,you might get a penalty ,or an opposing player sent off ,so make a meal out of every challenge ....fall down clutching a part of your body that hasnt been touched ,oh and dont forget to scream !!!
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 04 Dec 19 20:13
if dele allis goal was disallowed there i would give up watching football.
By:
lurka
When: 04 Dec 19 23:39
Clear penalty by VVD against Everton, also a mandatory red card as no attempt to play the ball. Clear as day on the video
By:
Crisp77
When: 05 Dec 19 06:19
VAR stands for Victory Anfield Reds
By:
Rider
When: 05 Dec 19 13:20
cant help thinking VAR looks at things more closely when play has stopped, everyone is looking at what happened and they have more of a pressure to act, when play goes on incidents seem to get swept under the carpet more easily as on the ongoing play is a distraction, this could be leading to more player simulation, ie staying on the ground forcing play to stop
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 05 Dec 19 20:59
is that the end of var ?
By:
leazes67
When: 05 Dec 19 21:07
Why's that?play to the whistle.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 05 Dec 19 21:11
aye leazes might have jumped gun, its a grey one for me .
By:
leazes67
When: 05 Dec 19 21:22
I would hate it against my team.
Page 7 of 13  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 13 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com