|
By:
12. Everton @2.64 = £2.15
13. Hull @1.62 = £11.66 14. Norwich @1.29 = £8.76 15. West Ham @1.38 = £4.96 16. Tottenham @3.35 = |
|
By:
How much have you lost?
|
|
By:
Which bit of the SIMPLE information above don't you understand?
|
|
By:
Indeed yr simple.
Good luck with today's lay. Bet you have bottled laying them. |
|
By:
You are being spectacularly stupid today for some reason.
|
|
By:
13. Hull @1.62 = £11.66
14. Norwich @1.29 = £8.76 15. West Ham @1.38 = £4.96 16. Tottenham @3.35 = -£18.54 17. Cardiff @1.21 = |
|
By:
Considering how well Liverpool have done, amazing to find you in profit after 15 games CJ I suppose if they had lost to Spurs things would not look so rosy for them.
|
|
By:
They only really win at heavily odds on prices, so although they rack up the wins it tends to be cheap. Of course whether they should be heavily odds on in those games is a different matter.
Man Utd and Spurs are the only wins above even money this season and Villa* and Sunderland the only wins above 1.50. Interesting for those looking to filter Liverpool games I'd have thought. |
|
By:
You will be level minus commission at the end of the season or thereabouts.
|
|
By:
14. Norwich @1.29 = £8.76
15. West Ham @1.38 = £4.96 16. Tottenham @3.35 = -£18.54 17. Cardiff @1.21 = -£20.64 18. Man City @4.9 = |
|
By:
I think our lay odds are too short. Should be between 6 & 7. City are incredible at home even without their top striker. Draw will be best we can hope for today. No chance we'll win this.
Good opportunity for the OP to get himself into credit by upping the stakes for this one. |
|
By:
15. West Ham @1.38 = £4.96
16. Tottenham @3.35 = -£18.54 17. Cardiff @1.21 = -£20.64 18. Man City @4.9 = -£11.13 19. Chelsea @3.65 = |
|
By:
on the other hand united are showing massive profits to the same strategy...to much amusement
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
16. Tottenham @3.35 = -£18.54
17. Cardiff @1.21 = -£20.64 18. Man City @4.9 = -£11.13 19. Chelsea @3.65 = -£1.62 20. Hull @1.34 = |
|
By:
17. Cardiff @1.21 = -£20.64
18. Man City @4.9 = -£11.13 19. Chelsea @3.65 = -£1.62 20. Hull @1.34 = -£5.02 21. Stoke @1.55 = |
|
By:
18. Man City @4.9 = -£11.13
19. Chelsea @3.65 = -£1.62 20. Hull @1.34 = -£5.02 21. Stoke @1.55 = -£10.52 22. Villa @1.24 = Put up early as even the silliness that charges in a Liverpool price week in/out would struggle to justify that nonsense. |
|
By:
19. Chelsea @3.65 = -£1.62
20. Hull @1.34 = -£5.02 21. Stoke @1.55 = -£10.52 22. Villa @1.24 = -£1.01 23. Everton @1.84 = |
|
By:
20. Hull @1.34 = -£5.02
21. Stoke @1.55 = -£10.52 22. Villa @1.24 = -£1.01 23. Everton @1.84 = -£9.41 24. West Brom @1.67 = |
|
By:
21. Stoke @1.55 = -£10.52
22. Villa @1.24 = -£1.01 23. Everton @1.84 = -£9.41 24. West Brom @1.67 = £0.10 25. Arsenal @2.26 = |
|
By:
22. Villa @1.24 = -£1.01
23. Everton @1.84 = -£9.41 24. West Brom @1.67 = £0.10 25. Arsenal @2.26 = -£12.50 26. Fulham @1.44 = |
|
By:
BJ 69 YX:YX - what a shame that this thread has exposed you as the bigoted fool you are
![]() ![]() ![]() If you had any sense, the obvious betting strategy would have been to lay manure when you would have made a fortune ![]() ![]() ![]() though laying Chavskis has also returned a good profit, as they have drawn quite a few and rarely win any match other than when very long odds on shots ![]() ![]() ![]() but a deluded fool such as yourself is unable to grasp these simple facts ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
The problem with laying Man Utd is that the markets move when they don't perform. Hence the thread.
Bigoted betting 2014, woohoo! |
|
By:
I am really glad that you have lost money laying Liverpool BJ 69 YX:YX
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() my only regret is that as a £2 punter even you will not have been able to blow your benefits on these bets ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Not sure math is your strong point. There's a certain irony in the benefit argument though.
|
|
By:
if you had any betting knowledge at all BJ69 YX:YX - you would surely realise that the odds on manure are ALWAYS very short based on their historical performance
![]() ![]() ![]() Given how few matches manure have won this season - take a look at the table if you do not believe me - you would have made an absolute packet if you had the sense to lay them this year ![]() ![]() ![]() but this simple concept is well beyond your very simple understanding ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
you are such a simpleton BJ69 YX:YX
![]() ![]() ![]() do the maths your self, it is quite easy to work out ![]() ![]() ![]() In the premier league manure have won just 12 out of 26 matches ![]() ![]() ![]() with very few of these wins at evens or greater (maybe the Arse but I can't think of many others) ![]() ![]() The vast majority of manures victories were at very short odds indeed ![]() ![]() ![]() so laying manure this season has give rise to MASSIVE profits ![]() ![]() ![]() only a simpleton better is incapable of understanding this ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
BJ69 YX:YX is such a simpleton he is incapable of working out how laying manure this season has given rise to MASSIVE profits
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I'm in awe of this great wisdom. Perhaps you should create a thread and prove this to be correct?
|
|
By:
what a betting buffoon you are - it is sooooooooooooooo obvious that laying manure has been a betting windfall this season
![]() ![]() but you have been unable to work this out ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
what a betting buffoon you are - it is sooooooooooooooo obvious that laying manure has been a betting windfall this season
![]() ![]() but you have been unable to work this out ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
BJ69 YX:YX the betting buffoon
![]() ![]() unable to understand a very simple betting concept ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
rofl @ BJ69 YX:YX the betting buffoon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
and I do not even charge for my advice
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I think he may have just exploded.
|
|
By:
BJ69 YX:YX the betting buffoon
![]() ![]() ![]() unable to grasp simple betting concepts ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |