Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 390 comments are related to the topic:
***india v england 2nd test***
***india v england 2nd test***
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 390
|
By:
Tom it has been popping off the pitch since the second hour.
Rohit has knocked England a full length I have been backing unders from under 348.5 |
|
By:
you are fearless WD
 |
|
By:
Reckless!
But when it pays it pays |
|
By:
3rd ump cheating again!
|
|
By:
Under431.5 is almost a free bet from here!
Imho |
|
By:
i need some valium watching the windies screen
|
|
By:
omfg, that is incredible
|
|
By:
England will be seething when they see that
|
|
By:
but not to check it?!
|
|
By:
first time ive ever seen that, 3rd umpire refusing to check a decision
|
|
By:
get in...mo da man
|
|
By:
‘Death strikes again!
|
|
By:
and the tv producer only shows it one time as well
 |
|
By:
No harm done, as it happens.
|
|
By:
3rd ump cheating again!
I got more bets on just before he was out Well done third umpire! |
|
By:
The umpire told root something and root nodded his head, as if to say the umpire was telling Root that it had been checked
|
|
By:
no way england are winning this test
|
|
By:
SKITTLE EM ENGERLAND !
|
|
By:
and England lost the review! absolutely scandalous
|
|
By:
Mo and Jack turning it square on day one.
England under / over 39.5 in the 4th innings. |
|
By:
quite right, tom, I stand corrected.
|
|
By:
outrageous
|
|
By:
3rd ump a cheating coont, twice now
|
|
By:
I expected India to be bowled our shortly after tea but The Incredibly Talented Rohit Sharma has won this match for India and before lunch imho
|
|
By:
Review given back according to commentary
|
|
By:
review returned?
|
|
By:
faaarcce
|
|
By:
I am seething terry!
|
|
By:
and windies 3 down
  |
|
By:
 calysoo...brown bags..lidl's for me |
|
By:
Yes review given back!
|
|
By:
Fear not Tel
Draw will be removed from equation! |
|
By:
66666..take cover
|
|
By:
Panty Boi
|
|
By:
Panty Boi could get an advertising contract with the sanitizer company!
|
|
By:
I suspect England have actually benefitted there if you followed the letter of the laws.
Umpires are allowed to and make bad decisions all the time. I don't think there is anything that allows reviews to be given back after the fact though. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I can't imagine what rule may be involved, but it's actually fair to restore the review, because he didn't review what Root wanted.
|
|
By:
Was actually last year
|