Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 797 comments are related to the topic:
Australia vs England and assorted other nationals - 2nd ODI
Australia vs England and assorted other nationals - 2nd ODI
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 797
|
By:
66666666 MORGAN
|
|
By:
I think people listening to me would make more money than I do.... Always seem to get overexposed and miss the big swings.
Oh well, in the green zone for a few hundgey, can't complain too much. |
|
By:
666666565
|
|
By:
Fair enough. This was once the bash n crash, wham bam thank you ma'am format. It no longer holds that mantle. And since it isn't the traditional format I don't see much of a future for it in our time sensitive lives. Understand what you're saying though.
|
|
By:
Even money now. Problem for England is we have 2 of him, better, opening the innings, and another 2 coming in at 5 and 6....
Think we may even see 2.10-2.20 Aus, at which point, may be a case of load up. |
|
By:
44444444 butler
|
|
By:
finch and warner better than morgan? Not so sure imo. Not in ODIs for me.
|
|
By:
Yeah, I think it dies out too. No room for all 3 IMO. ODI sticking around now due to ages of cricket fans, but I think mainstream will be 3.5 hour games, and test match cricket for the purests and special occassions.
Will all die though. T20 cricket is where all the money is, and as such is where people will try to make it. The only place ODI cricket really plays atm is that it allows for slower scoring, to even allow test matches to take place. |
|
By:
100 up well played Morgan
|
|
By:
I haven't greened yet. What score do England need for evens
|
|
By:
I think 300
|
|
By:
About 20 runs ago they hit evens....
|
|
By:
India p1ssing those chases against aus has the market believing that 300 is the new 250 it seems. Aus aren't India though.
ALthough England's bowling attack looks a bit iffy. Can't do any worse than the main boys did though can they?! |
|
By:
Laid a bit on 300+ at 1.20 for a possible trade
|
|
By:
20/20 I think is the greatest thing Cricket has ever done. The one problem with cricket was always the time it takes to play out. Finding a format that not only reduced playing time to that of a football match, whilst increasing the tempo and entertainment, was pure genius. Whoever got the ball rolling in that aspect was a true innovator.
|
|
By:
That had to be 6.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Morgan has the track record, and probably not a literal statement. I rate Morgan very highly.
Morgan: 40 @ 86 Finch 35 @ 93 Warner 31 @ 81 Enough T20 form to show they have the ability to far surpass Morgan though, as both early in their career. FTR Bailley 55 @ 92 Maxwell 35 @ 130 Between the 4 of them, I believe they average at least 4 players of Morgans class. |
|
By:
wasnt a 6 feet weren't touching the ground
|
|
By:
But his feet were touching the ground behind the boundary then he jumped. Surely you can't launch from that position.
|
|
By:
Ok
|
|
By:
England should have another 4 runs at the change of innings
|
|
By:
Have to leave from the field of play not outside it. Otherwise you could sit in the crowd and as long as you jumped, catch it in mid air.
|
|
By:
yeah fair point mate - down to opinion I suppose. Morgan is just one of the very few England players that I rate highly.
|
|
By:
Having watched cricket for 20 years I'm still learning new rules every now and then. Something new a,
|
|
By:
always pops up
|
|
By:
Did they count it as 6? I don't think so. Oz backers could get a nasty surprise post innings.
|
|
By:
He 100% jumped from outside. Feet planted outside then jumped straight up.
|
|
By:
They will add the 4 runs at the change of innings
|
|
By:
Can England get 300?
|
|
By:
DOT
|
|
By:
DOT AGAIN
|
|
By:
300+ matched at 1.03 but laid as high as 29
|
|
By:
No ONE knows whether umpires will add the 4 runs
|
|
By:
could have been carnage on the runs if the umps go back and look at the 6 on the boundary and give eng extra 4.
 laid 1.03 for 150 quid and was trying to get a few quid at 50... went up to 29 ish. |
|
By:
don't quite understand this love in for joe root from ian botham.
|
|
By:
Those last two overs undid a lot of Morgans good work. 20 runs short I think, but getting Warner or Finch early changes things.
|
|
By:
1.03 300+ RUNS BACKERS
1.03 $1,820 1.04 $2,466 1.05 $7,862 1.06 $64 1.07 $726 1.08 $2,762 1.09 $95 1.10 $1,343 1.11 $215 1.12 $1,100 1.13 $912 1.14 $10,000 1.15 $9,942 1.16 $1,826 1.17 $791 1.18 $5,511 1.19 $5,243 1.20 $6,433 |