Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 169 comments are related to the topic:
Pakistan vs Windies

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 169
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:00
All rockstars in Windies team and that sometimes can be the undoing for a rockstar team..no one bankable.
By:
Butchos123
When: 07 Jun 13 12:07
I think this is a big price still on WI. Wickets are not the problem at the moment, run rate is.
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:09
This is 50 overs...RR is never a problem in 50 overs till they reach 40 overs...wickets is..and Pakistan's main concern is wickets here not RR
By:
Clueless1
When: 07 Jun 13 12:12
layed 225 runs, so good start
By:
Butchos123
When: 07 Jun 13 12:14
Hmm not sure I agree there, but let's face it, they're linked. 3 runs/over is pitiful in any limited overs format. 3 runs an over for the first 40 when they could be scoring say 5 will leave them 80 runs short of what they could have had!!
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:16
Only time would tell..if these two stay till 35 Pakistan would be more than 250 here..but that is if these two stay till then..Roach done with 7 overs..so lots of pie overs to come..
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:19
I would not be happy laying 225.  Plenty of time to come.
By:
ayt
When: 07 Jun 13 12:23
pak ll be in trouble before the 3rd powerplay
By:
peckerdunne
When: 07 Jun 13 12:24
Hard to know what a fair score is, but 240 must be minimum to defend.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:24
just gone green!  Should I stay or should I go?

will wait as these 2 look set but will be grateful to have saved a loss
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:28
I think Naraine would bowl in PP..they wont get him on now..
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:29
Yeah agree with Moody there...Naraine should have been used as an attacking option..
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 12:31
Pak could easily get 250 here still if they keep wickets in hand.  T20 has changed the way players think about the game.

This partnership was just what they needed.
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:33
Okaie so I was wrong..here is Naraine.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:33
Can anyone see if Misbah is running down the pitch?  I am sure he is at times and am thinking that 240 might be a good score if that is the case.  Not sure Pak will get that far though
By:
Butchos123
When: 07 Jun 13 12:33
Even if playing a la T20, that would leave them 140ish from the last 20. With 3 wickets down. 250 would be a tough ask.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:33
you weren't wrong he should have been on earlier
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:36
I need to get a gold chain to go with my Windies shirt.  Is Gerald Ratner still open?
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 12:37
Having said what Pakistan might do, I still think the most likely scenario is they lose 4 wickets during the power play and limp to 200.
By:
leefee
When: 07 Jun 13 12:40
gone
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:40
Given away..stupid batting..was not needed.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:40
I think they make 230+

Another quality post!
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:41
All the hard work just to throw it away...at a time when it was not needed. Squirrel brain.
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:42
250 might be out of question now, another rebuilding would start
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 12:43
More batting stupidity.   Idiotic.
By:
leefee
When: 07 Jun 13 12:44
ooops
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 07 Jun 13 12:44
130 might be a good score now!
By:
ayt
When: 07 Jun 13 12:45
i m just cool
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:52
Anything that Pak socres now would be bonus.
By:
Steam
When: 07 Jun 13 12:56
Holding now speaking all sort of horse **** now..they were never in position to take PP earlier..Paks plan went for a toss with the minute of madness from Jamshit..
By:
steview84
When: 07 Jun 13 12:59
1.17!!! i'd come to trade out thinking it would be around 1.05.
no chance at 1.17.
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 12:59
Jamshad pretty much responsible for this.
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 13:00
Although to be fair Malik and Akmal utterly useless.
By:
Clueless1
When: 07 Jun 13 13:09
layed 225 runs, so good start
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 07 Jun 13 13:17
Time they changed that stupid rule. The ball should have to hit the stumps by a throw, or not out.
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 13:21
Yes I agree.  Throw or with ball in hand.
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 13:23
Hafeez, Shafiq, Farhat, Malik, Akmal.  Scored, what, 8 runs between them today.  Absolutely pathetic performance.
By:
Java
When: 07 Jun 13 13:27
Hahaha - so, so idiotic.  7 wickets down.  12 overs left.  I know - let's risk a run out by basic lack of concentration.  Laugh
By:
Kelly
When: 07 Jun 13 13:28
Decided many years ago not to bet on any match with Pakistan involved .  Last half hour has just re-emphasized how shrewd a call that was .
By:
yashgupta
When: 07 Jun 13 13:33
choro ki barat pak
Page 3 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com