Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 680 comments are related to the topic:
Have Sweden flattened the curve without trashing the economy?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 10 of 18  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 18 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 680
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 19:50
what % of uk and sweden have been infected? how strong is immunity? how long does immunity last?
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 19:51
Angoose
08 May 20 18:44
Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 16,073 | Blogger: Angoose's blog
Because what gets published on an anonymous gambling forum is influencing government policy, eh.

^

Why the refusal to screen grab and publish the real chart...?

Goto:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aa

Click:
Avlidna/dag

Screengrab

And upload and publish.

Simple.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 19:52
Do you know how many deaths have occurred but are not yet reported ?
By:
Injera
When: 08 May 20 19:56
Do you know how many people have died because of covid? I don’t. The definitions are sketchy.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 19:57
jollyswagman
08 May 20 18:50
Joined: 04 Jul 15
| Topic/replies: 9,133 | Blogger: jollyswagman's blog
what % of uk and sweden have been infected? how strong is immunity? how long does immunity last?

^
what % of uk and sweden have been infected?

3,175 deaths population 10m

at Ferguson rate (0.9%) that is 352k or 3%
at Iceland rate (0.2%) that is 1.6m or 16%

Numbers obviously higher in Stockholm.

how strong is immunity?

Do not know yet. Likely to at least give some immunity and block the spread. Jury is out on this. Lets hope there is or forget getting a vaccine.

how long does immunity last?

Relates to your first question. If there is immunity for year or two that will slow the spread and help it fizzle out.
By:
Injera
When: 08 May 20 20:01
Infection fatality rate is an attempt to work out the true number of people a disease kills, compared to a case fatality rate which calculates the death rate among diagnosed patients.

Because so many people - now believed to be millions in the UK alone - have been infected with COVID-19 but never diagnosed, the true lethality of it remains a mystery.

- Decent article with various thoughts on mortality rates.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8293489/Scientists-estimate-coronavirus-kills-0-75-patients.html
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:02
so trader ou do not know, you are guessing. that is all i am saying, no one knows so your claim that sweden is doing a great job is not correct. i do not know what we should be doing, i am certain of nothing.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:06
and i read it is mutating slower than the flu which makes finding a vaccine easier apparently.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:10
that daily mail article is depressing, it gives a gazillion different ifr numbers. confused.com
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:11
Angoose
08 May 20 18:52
Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 16,074 | Blogger: Angoose's blog
Do you know how many deaths have occurred but are not yet reported ?

^

Been following the real data for weeks on:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aa

And there are some increases but never enough to suggest Sweden has not flattened the curve.

Your refusal to use your forum privilege to publish the real charts direct for the Swedish health service speaks volumes for your bias in this debate.

Disgrace misinformation.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:12
There was an interesting select committee hearing earlier in the week and the topic of IFR was discussed.

One of the contributors (forget his name) had provided a range but was subsequently asked to pin it down by an MP.
His response was effectively to ask which number do you want ?

Many papers written, many opinions expressed, no consensus arrived at.
By:
Injera
When: 08 May 20 20:13
Indeed jolly. We’re all in the dark. Judging by the daily press conferences, so are the decision makers.

A more flexible lockdown would give them more idea at what works and what doesn’t. Instead it’s a one size all approach.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:13

May 8, 2020 -- 8:11PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


Angoose08 May 20 18:52Joined: 18 Jul 02| Topic/replies: 16,074 | Blogger: Angoose's blogDo you know how many deaths have occurred but are not yet reported ?^Been following the real data for weeks on:https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aaAnd there are some increases but never enough to suggest Sweden has not flattened the curve.Your refusal to use your forum privilege to publish the real charts direct for the Swedish health service speaks volumes for your bias in this debate.Disgrace misinformation.


I don't have any special forum privileges, just know how to work the system Silly
And you still haven't advised the forum if you know how many deaths have occurred that have not yet been reported.

By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:19
The invisible pandemic

Many   countries   (and   members   of   their  press  media)  have  marvelled  at  Sweden’s  relaxed  strategy  in  the  face  of  the  coronavirus  disease  2019  (COVID-19)  pandemic:  schools  and  most workplaces have remained open, and  police  officers  were  not  checking  one’s  errands  in  the  street.  Severe  critics  have  described  it  as  Sweden  sacrificing   its   (elderly)   citizens   to   quickly  reach  herd  immunity.

1  The  death  toll  has  surpassed  our  three  closest neighbours, Denmark, Norway, and Finland, but the mortality remains lower  than  in  the  UK,  Spain,  and  Belgium.

2 It  has  become  clear  that  a  hard  lockdown  does  not  protect  old  and  frail  people  living  in  care  homes—a  population    the    lockdown    was    designed  to  protect.

3  Neither  does  it  decrease  mortality  from  COVID-19,  which is evident when comparing the UK’s  experience  with  that  of  other  European countries.

PCR   testing   and   some   straight-forward  assumptions  indicate  that,  as  of  April  29,  2020,  more  than  half  a million people in Stockholm county, Sweden,  which  is  about  20–25%  of  the  population,  have  been  infected  (Hansson  D,  Swedish  Public  Health  Agency,  personal  communication).  98–99% of these people are probably unaware   or   uncertain   of   having   had  the  infection;  they  either  had  symptoms   that   were   severe,   but   not  severe  enough  for  them  to  go  to  a  hospital  and  get  tested,  or  no  symptoms  at  all.  Serology  testing  is  now supporting these assumptions.4These  facts  have  led  me  to  the  following  conclusions.  Everyone  will  be exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome    coronavirus    2,    and    most  people  will  become  infected.  COVID-19 is spreading like wildfire in all countries, but we do not see it—it almost  always  spreads  from  younger  people with no or weak symptoms to other people who will also have mild symptoms. This is the real pandemic, but  it  goes  on  beneath  the  surface,  and  is  probably  at  its  peak  now  in  many  European  countries.  There  is  very  little  we  can  do  to  prevent  this  spread:   a   lockdown   might   delay   severe  cases  for  a  while,  but  once  restrictions   are   eased,   cases   will   reappear. I expect that when we count the number of deaths from COVID-19 in  each  country  in  1  year  from  now,  the  figures  will  be  similar,  regardless  of measures taken.Measures to flatten the curve might have  an  effect,  but  a  lockdown  only  pushes the severe cases into the future —it will not prevent them. Admittedly, countries   have   managed   to   slow   down spread so as not to overburden health-care systems, and, yes, effective drugs  that  save  lives  might  soon  be  developed, but this pandemic is swift, and those drugs have to be developed, tested,  and  marketed  quickly.  Much  hope  is  put  in  vaccines,  but  they  will  take  time,  and  with  the  unclear  protective immunological response to infection, it is not certain that vaccines will be very effective.In  summary,  COVID-19  is  a  disease  that  is  highly  infectious  and  spreads  rapidly  through  society.  It  is  often  quite  symptomless  and  might  pass  unnoticed,  but  it  also  causes  severe  disease,  and  even  death,  in  a  pro-portion  of  the  population,  and  our  most  important  task  is  not  to  stop  spread,  which  is  all  but  futile,  but  to  concentrate on giving the unfortunate victims optimal care.I declare no competing interests.Johan Gieseckejohan.giesecke@ki.se

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2931035-7
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:20
that is part of the problem, there isnt a single epidemic there are multiple outbreaks throughout the country travelling at their own speed. the trouble with different rules in different places is that there are lots of idiots out there ....
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:21
And they'll all be in Welsh garden centres come Monday Grin
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:24
3  Neither  does  it  decrease  mortality  from  COVID-19,  which is evident when comparing the UK’s  experience  with  that  of  other  European countries.

absolute rubbish, the uk does not have a hard lock down, look at all the countries i mentioned earlier.

https://twitter.com/yaneerbaryam/status/1251704323035344896/photo/1

greece opted to lock down two weeks before spain, they stand as of now at 14 deaths per million compared to 562 for spain. athens is one of the most crowded cities in europe i think???
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:25
Angoose
08 May 20 19:13
Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 16,077 | Blogger: Angoose's blog

    May 8, 2020 -- 7:11PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


    Angoose08 May 20 18:52Joined: 18 Jul 02| Topic/replies: 16,074 | Blogger: Angoose's blogDo you know how many deaths have occurred but are not yet reported ?^Been following the real data for weeks on:https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aaAnd there are some increases but never enough to suggest Sweden has not flattened the curve.Your refusal to use your forum privilege to publish the real charts direct for the Swedish health service speaks volumes for your bias in this debate.Disgrace misinformation.


I don't have any special forum privileges, just know how to work the system Silly
And you still haven't advised the forum if you know how many deaths have occurred that have not yet been reported.

^

I publish the number regularly. They only go up small amounts. I do not think any real number will go over the real peak number on April 8th of 115. Do you?

It is clear when you look at the real chart on :

https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aa

That the curve is well and truely flattened without lockdown regardless of how much the 'lockdowners' wish Sweden had failed.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 08 May 20 20:25
19:19Joined: 25 Aug 05 | Topic/replies: 11,967 | Blogger: InsiderTrader's blog
The invisible pandemic

Many   countries   (and   members   of   their  press  media)  have  marvelled  at  Sweden’s  relaxed  strategy  in  the  face  of  the  coronavirus  disease  2019  (COVID-19)  pandemic:  schools  and  most workplaces have remained open, and  police  officers  were  not  checking  one’s  errands  in  the  street.  Severe  critics  have  described  it  as  Sweden  sacrificing   its   (elderly)   citizens   to   quickly  reach  herd  immunity.

1  The  death  toll  has  surpassed  our  three  closest neighbours, Denmark, Norway, and Finland, but the mortality remains lower  than  in  the  UK,  Spain,  and  Belgium.

2 It  has  become  clear  that  a  hard  lockdown  does  not  protect  old  and  frail  people  living  in  care  homes—a  population    the    lockdown    was    designed  to  protect.

3  Neither  does  it  decrease  mortality  from  COVID-19,  which is evident when comparing the UK’s  experience  with  that  of  other  European countries.

PCR   testing   and   some   straight-forward  assumptions  indicate  that,  as  of  April  29,  2020,  more  than  half  a million people in Stockholm county, Sweden,  which  is  about  20–25%  of  the  population,  have  been  infected  (Hansson  D,  Swedish  Public  Health  Agency,  personal  communication).  98–99% of these people are probably unaware   or   uncertain   of   having   had  the  infection;  they  either  had  symptoms   that   were   severe,   but   not  severe  enough  for  them  to  go  to  a  hospital  and  get  tested,  or  no  symptoms  at  all.  Serology  testing  is  now supporting these assumptions.4These  facts  have  led  me  to  the  following  conclusions.  Everyone  will  be exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome    coronavirus    2,    and    most  people  will  become  infected.  COVID-19 is spreading like wildfire in all countries, but we do not see it—it almost  always  spreads  from  younger  people with no or weak symptoms to other people who will also have mild symptoms. This is the real pandemic, but  it  goes  on  beneath  the  surface,  and  is  probably  at  its  peak  now  in  many  European  countries.  There  is  very  little  we  can  do  to  prevent  this  spread:   a   lockdown   might   delay   severe  cases  for  a  while,  but  once  restrictions   are   eased,   cases   will   reappear. I expect that when we count the number of deaths from COVID-19 in  each  country  in  1  year  from  now,  the  figures  will  be  similar,  regardless  of measures taken.Measures to flatten the curve might have  an  effect,  but  a  lockdown  only  pushes the severe cases into the future —it will not prevent them. Admittedly, countries   have   managed   to   slow   down spread so as not to overburden health-care systems, and, yes, effective drugs  that  save  lives  might  soon  be  developed, but this pandemic is swift, and those drugs have to be developed, tested,  and  marketed  quickly.  Much  hope  is  put  in  vaccines,  but  they  will  take  time,  and  with  the  unclear  protective immunological response to infection, it is not certain that vaccines will be very effective.In  summary,  COVID-19  is  a  disease  that  is  highly  infectious  and  spreads  rapidly  through  society.  It  is  often  quite  symptomless  and  might  pass  unnoticed,  but  it  also  causes  severe  disease,  and  even  death,  in  a  pro-portion  of  the  population,  and  our  most  important  task  is  not  to  stop  spread,  which  is  all  but  futile,  but  to  concentrate on giving the unfortunate victims optimal care.I declare no competing interests.Johan Gieseckejohan.giesecke@ki.se

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2931035-7
Rate reply:
| reportblock










Comparisons are contrived, why not compare like with like


They are doing very badly
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:27
jolly, with respect, are you claiming more knowledge on this subject than Johan Giesecke?
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:27
IT, how did you get the daily numbers from the official Swedish chart in the list form you posted ?
By:
Injera
When: 08 May 20 20:27
There’s an assumption that this virus spreads if people breath the air of infected people outside.

I see no scientific evidence for that. There’s also an understanding that so called non essential shops (i.e. a stationers or a garden centre) being open would lead to more infections.

Where’s the scientific evidence for that? A distancing policy is supposed to work in supermarkets, so why not in a garden centre?

Public transport is surely a spreader of disease at any time. So too international travel.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:28
Has lockdown protected people in carehomes in Italy, France, Spain, Ireland and the UK?
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 08 May 20 20:30
Not when you lockdown too late

Of course it won't, its already there and if you refuse hospital treatment for care home residents it's a death sentence for so many
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:30
with respect, are the numbers i put up correct or not?

close and possibly multiple contact, indoors seems to be the problem injera.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:30

May 8, 2020 -- 8:27PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


jolly, with respect, are you claiming more knowledge on this subject than Johan Giesecke?


You could pick one of hundreds of papers written on the subject from equally qualified individuals that will present a significantly different opinion from  Johan Giesecke. Which one is right ?

You choose to favour his opinion over others in an attempt to make a point on an anonymous internet forum.

By:
Injera
When: 08 May 20 20:30
No, not if staff are untested, travelling from home, often via public transport. Lodging them in empty hotels is an option I haven’t heard discussed.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:31

May 8, 2020 -- 8:28PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


Has lockdown protected people in carehomes in Italy, France, Spain, Ireland and the UK?


If you define lockdown as including sending possibly infected patients from hospital to care homes and allowing carers to pass from home to home, then yes, care homes were locked down.

By:
Des Pond
When: 08 May 20 20:31
Sweden's per capita mortality rates are now eight times those of Norway and three and a half times those of Denmark. Factors of 6 and 3 in comparison to their Nordic neighbours 10 days ago, looked bad enough. But They will have to ride it out now and hope for the best. Maybe their policy will look wise in the long run, but at the moment it does not look good.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:31
Angoose
08 May 20 19:27
Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 16,079 | Blogger: Angoose's blog
IT, how did you get the daily numbers from the official Swedish chart in the list form you posted ?

^

https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/smittskydd-beredskap/utbrott/aktuella-utbrott/covid-19/bekraftade-fall-i-sverige/

Follow the link:

Ladda ner data

Data som statistiken ovan bygger på kan laddas ner här (Excel)

To get all the data in format for a spreadsheet. Your charts look like basic Excel ones so you should be fine. If you need translations just ask.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:33
it looks like a guess des, that is all i want trader to admit. too early to know for sure and a massive guess that risks lives.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:34

May 8, 2020 -- 8:31PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


Angoose08 May 20 19:27Joined: 18 Jul 02| Topic/replies: 16,079 | Blogger: Angoose's blogIT, how did you get the daily numbers from the official Swedish chart in the list form you posted ?^https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/smittskydd-beredskap/utbrott/aktuella-utbrott/covid-19/bekraftade-fall-i-sverige/Follow the link:Ladda ner dataData som statistiken ovan bygger på kan laddas ner här (Excel)To get all the data in format for a spreadsheet. Your charts look like basic Excel ones so you should be fine. If you need translations just ask.


Obrigado.

By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:34
----you-have-to-laugh---
08 May 20 19:30
Joined: 06 Jul 10
| Topic/replies: 7,902 | Blogger: ----you-have-to-laugh---'s blog
Not when you lockdown too late

Of course it won't, its already there and if you refuse hospital treatment for care home residents it's a death sentence for so many

^

Agreed if they are refused that is bad.

But remember a third of those who are bad enough to go to hospital DIE in the UK. If older people really are being denied help then the basic stats suggest their chances in hospital would sadly be even worse than 1 in 3. Sad
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:35
Angoose
08 May 20 19:34
Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 16,082 | Blogger: Angoose's blog

    May 8, 2020 -- 7:31PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


    Angoose08 May 20 19:27Joined: 18 Jul 02| Topic/replies: 16,079 | Blogger: Angoose's blogIT, how did you get the daily numbers from the official Swedish chart in the list form you posted ?^https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/smittskydd-beredskap/utbrott/aktuella-utbrott/covid-19/bekraftade-fall-i-sverige/Follow the link:Ladda ner dataData som statistiken ovan bygger på kan laddas ner här (Excel)To get all the data in format for a spreadsheet. Your charts look like basic Excel ones so you should be fine. If you need translations just ask.


Obrigado.

^

Sem problemas
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:36

May 8, 2020 -- 8:34PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


----you-have-to-laugh---08 May 20 19:30Joined: 06 Jul 10| Topic/replies: 7,902 | Blogger: ----you-have-to-laugh---'s blogNot when you lockdown too lateOf course it won't, its already there and if you refuse hospital treatment for care home residents it's a death sentence for so many^Agreed if they are refused that is bad.But remember a third of those who are bad enough to go to hospital DIE in the UK. If older people really are being denied help then the basic stats suggest their chances in hospital would sadly be even worse than 1 in 3.


Ok, but they are being left in care homes to infect others when Nightingales are being decommissioned Sad

By:
Des Pond
When: 08 May 20 20:37
Trader is a stubborn fellow, you will do well to get him to admit anything. Devil
By:
jollyswagman
When: 08 May 20 20:38
i like him anyway, he doesnt throw his toys out of his pram Grin
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:43
"Fake news" as the death data will change when the admin catches up, but especially for IT

By:
InsiderTrader
When: 08 May 20 20:44
I remind you of the question folks...

Has Sweden Flattened the curve without trashing their economy

They have definitely flattened the curve although it remains to be seen if their economy is still trashed from the limited measures they have taken plus the global situation.
By:
Angoose
When: 08 May 20 20:45
The correct answer can only be "too early to say".
Page 10 of 18  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 18 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com