Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
dambuster
29 Nov 19 17:35
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Apr 02
| Topic/replies: 7,129 | Blogger: dambuster's blog
...Is that We have Pritti Patel as home secretary, she is excellent,
if Corbyn wins the election, we would have Diane Abbot dealing with today's terrorist attack, our safety would be in her hands...
PLEASE REMEMBER THIS WHEN YOU VOTE

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 5  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 195
By:
moisok
When: 29 Nov 19 17:42
tell me that jeremy wants to disarm the police and that it is spiv lies please
By:
Crisp77
When: 29 Nov 19 20:39
10th most popular story on BBC website today

Jeremy Corbyn 'not happy' with shoot-to-kill policy
16 November 2015

Election over me thinks
By:
UBLE/REGY
When: 29 Nov 19 21:35
Is this relating to one particular case?

An armed officer is permitted to shoot if they feel it is the only wat to save a persons life.

It is their duty.

If it is like the  when an Officer shoots, it is always to kill. The centre of the body, the biggest target. They are not expected to

be Wyatt Earps.

If an officer can deal with a situation without shooting, because they feel there is no danger to life, that is fine

The danger to life is the issue here.

It is a tight judgement at times

But they have an obligation to protect life.
By:
UBLE/REGY
When: 29 Nov 19 21:36
the Army
By:
UBLE/REGY
When: 29 Nov 19 21:38
Every situation is different, but there are set rules the Officers have to follow.
By:
geoff m
When: 29 Nov 19 21:41
Hope the officer receives some distinction for taking out the sc*m.
By:
flushgordon1
When: 29 Nov 19 21:43
Excellent double tap to his head ,commendation and promotion.
By:
saddo
When: 29 Nov 19 21:43
Freedom of the city would be a start.
By:
UBLE/REGY
When: 29 Nov 19 21:46
Laugh
By:
peckerdunne
When: 29 Nov 19 22:38
They are not expected to

be Wyatt Earps. Grin
By:
casemoney
When: 29 Nov 19 23:56
OUT ON A TAG PREVIOUS TERROR BUSINESS ,we can safely saying he will not be carrying out any more attacks , But shocking that he is out at all , What will be the story ?
By:
macarony
When: 30 Nov 19 01:00
Well out now right out the only tag he will have now is the one on his toe
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 30 Nov 19 07:19
casemoney 29 Nov 19 23:56 Joined: 04 Aug 06

OUT ON A TAG PREVIOUS TERROR BUSINESS ,we can safely saying he will not be carrying out any more attacks , But shocking that he is out at all , What will be the story


Yep, all this talk about diane and co. Whilst the present incumbents are releasing dangerous terrorists on tag.
By:
Reynard
When: 30 Nov 19 08:42
Tough on crime , tough on the victims of crime Plain
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 30 Nov 19 09:07
Unfookbelievable:

The man who carried out the London Bridge terror attack has been identified as 28-year-old Usman Khan, Metropolitan Police confirm. He was jailed in 2012 as part of a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp. He was also believed to have supported al-Muhijaroun, a militant jihadist network in the United Kingdom
By:
saddo
When: 30 Nov 19 09:32
30,000 similar types on our streets apparently, we can't afford to watch them all.
By:
lovegod
When: 30 Nov 19 10:02
Can't we build a prison on an island and leave them to it?

Preferably the one that is infected with anthrax.
By:
terry mccann
When: 30 Nov 19 11:40
The same Patel who got fired for lying about having secret talks with Israel-how do these type always gain back power I wonder?
By:
mymumsfinethankyou
When: 30 Nov 19 11:49
he got 16years ,,out in 7 ,,  innocent people murdered ,,by a guy that should be still in the nick,, due to stupid laws he was let out,,
By:
acey deucy
When: 30 Nov 19 12:06
Big respect to the people that tackled this nutter....Should be given a Knighthood every one of them.
By:
alun2005
When: 30 Nov 19 12:24
Should be given a Knighthood every one of them.

More likely to be put on an Anti-Terror Watch List, just like the Millwall supporting hero of London Bridge 2017.


BTW, has any Lefty been on the media yet to 'explain' that the root cause of yesterday's atrocity was 'Islamophobia" ? 

I know the Muslim Council of Britain is concerned about the made-up phenomenon of "Islamophobia", but do they have any comment on the religion that inspired the perpetrator of yesterday's atrocities?
By:
moisok
When: 30 Nov 19 13:38
Just remember this was his second attempt - amazing we allowed him another go.  Our system is junk.
By:
mymumsfinethankyou
When: 30 Nov 19 14:08

Nov 30, 2019 -- 1:38PM, moisok wrote:


Just remember this was his second attempt - amazing we allowed him another go.

By:
casemoney
When: 30 Nov 19 15:13
400 CHAPS back from Syria , Stand by for further Action ..
By:
saddo
When: 30 Nov 19 15:14
Round the clock surveillance needs nine men apiece  Laugh
By:
Gin
When: 30 Nov 19 15:27
It has now come out that one of the "heroes" who tackled him on the bridge was a murderer out on day release!

What chance have you got!.........

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/man-who-helped-bring-down-3595739
By:
dambuster
When: 30 Nov 19 16:03
Take all 30,00 off the streets, put them on a prison ship 8 miles out at sea , if they want to swim back, give it a go, but mind the machine guns as you come up the beach.
Is that ok with you Mr Corbyn ?
By:
bigmo
When: 30 Nov 19 17:00
Politicians and the media don't give sh* t about all this. What is the point of this thread?
By:
detraveller
When: 30 Nov 19 17:04
No point. It's the same everytime. The only difference this time is that less people have complained about how the media is covering this. I'm not sure why. In previous attacks people used to compare TV coverage from different channels but I only saw a couple of posts about sky and nothing else.
By:
detraveller
When: 30 Nov 19 17:07
Just give it two days though everyone will be back to corbyn and Co.
By:
dambuster
When: 30 Nov 19 17:17
Anyone who backs Corbyn and co, Should also be on the police watch list, as they must be terrorist sympathisers or retarded and put in secure units
By:
saddo
When: 30 Nov 19 17:25
detraveller has backed Corbyn ^^
By:
detraveller
When: 30 Nov 19 17:27
True I have and comfortably in the red ExcitedGrin
By:
detraveller
When: 30 Nov 19 17:29
I don't mind being on the British police watchlist either. They don't have enough ppl to watch me anyways
By:
bigmo
When: 30 Nov 19 17:29
The stupidity of some on here is breathtaking.
By:
flushgordon1
When: 30 Nov 19 17:56
Zacly, carry on as normal ,we won't let them change us, could I have another one added to my security detail for a few months.
By:
moisok
When: 30 Nov 19 18:47
it won't interfere - it will not disrupt normal activity  we will stand shoulder to shoulder - business as usual

so they cancel canvassing in landan

with canvassing cancelled   boris and patel, that chief copper can  have a nice dinner with some rather cheeky new wines just in from Barnier


you 'ave to larf

instead they could have gone out and arrested a few hundred or thousand even

but no - just sit breath in deeply

while two people were left dead in the street etc
By:
dambuster
When: 30 Nov 19 19:52
Why are we watching Dangerous people,? surely they should be banged up...
and Could the father of the poor lad murdered sue the security services?
By:
dambuster
When: 30 Nov 19 19:56
As we all know in this country , money is worth more than life, so if the security services were sued every time a person of danger
killed or injured an innocent member of the public and they were on release just to appease the Human rights brigade (who are another massive minority).
Would the security services do more to protect us.?
Page 1 of 5  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com