Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1211 comments are related to the topic:
Tommy back in Court tomorrow 4th July
Tommy back in Court tomorrow 4th July
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,211
|
By:
Tommy Robinson faces jail after being found in contempt of court for filming defendants in a criminal trial and broadcasting the footage on social media.
Mr Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, could be jailed for up to two years after the ruling by High Court judges. Disorder broke out outside the court as the verdict filtered through to the crowds of supporters of Mr Robinson. Police raised their batons after some supporters stormed fences separating them from the media and the public, and beer cans were also thrown at journalists. Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting at the Old Bailey with Mr Justice Warby, found Robinson in contempt in three respects. Robinson, wearing a blue jacket, blue shirt and jeans, showed little reaction as the judge announced the decision. Dame Victoria said the court will consider what penalty to impose for the contempt, and give full reasons for the decision, at a later date. |
|
By:
Justice served . He had no right whatsoever attempting to expose crimes that the government and police have spent millions attempting to cover up . It is only reasonable to expect the system to protect those that colluded with the perpetrators , whose only offence was to destroy the lives of thousands of innocent young girls .
Hopefully this will serve as a lesson to any other fool who tries to speak out about injustice and suffering  |
|
By:
& the media are now filming and trying to interview TR outside the court.
|
|
By:
They need to familiarise themselves with the new 'contempt laws' which were introduced by proxy less than an hour ago or they could find themselves in serious trouble
 |
|
By:
they should be introduced on here
|
|
By:
seemed an obvious decision
he was clearly in the wrong(according to the law), now he needs his boys to do a deal, that keeps himself out, and then not be doing it again. |
|
By:
Read one article that said the Attorney General accused him of acting unsympathetically to the accused entering the court ? WTF does that mean ?
|
|
By:
live now (scroll back a few minutes), looks a broken man "like a sheep to the wolves"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iDeFVOEUcc |
|
By:
He will be a dead man in our jails,too many ruled by muslim gangs now with a fatwa on his life.Not sure that our justice system has behaved correctly here and we may have blood on our hands.
|
|
By:
A joyous day for the left wing muslim paedophile defenders for anyone else who has a shred of decency an exasperating one,realising you most certainly live in a corrupt country who has chosen who you can't tell the truth about as long as acceptable targets suffer the consequence.
The contempt of court charge a mickey mouse one to get him in in court ready for the hammer,example set sides have been fully chosen time to say the country is F U C K E D. |
|
By:
Rubbish Denzil!
Are you a law abiding citizen? |
|
By:
What would have happened if the trial of the grooming gang collapsed because of the actions of Yaxley-Lennon?
|
|
By:
Yes, he's reported his local barber for running a grooming gang.
|
|
By:
Don't be sensible Whispering Death.
|
|
By:
Definition of 'law abiding' required .
Particularly in the light of todays events whereby there is every reason to believe that a man has been convicted of a crime where quite possibly no law was broken  |
|
By:
|
|
By:
STUDYFORM - You condemn those who speak out against it . Kinda similar in many peoples eyes
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Whisperingdeath Do you have any evidence I'm not a law abiding citizen?
There'd have been no trial collapse they had evidence that these rapists were guilty that's why they've been convicted. |
|
By:
Whispering If you raped someone and the police had evidence to prove that yet it was made known you were on trial you'd still be convicted with said evidence,you aren't suddenly not a potential rapist just because you are known to be on trial the evidence doesn't disappear.
|
|
By:
...And some were named in other cases even before being charged. Didn't stop their trials.
|
|
By:
Rolf Harris named before trial and tv cameras catching him attending court each day.
What did TR do different. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
You don't half talk some shyte SF.
|
|
By:
Over 100 words attacking OPs but not one word of condemnation for the groomers.
|
|
By:
correct ruling. back to prison where he belongs
|
|
By:
STUDY you have no shame dragging up completely unrelated tripe from the 1930s again when you are struggling,you moan about people being too political or left and right and you are the worst one on here for that you NEVER do reasoning.
|
|
By:
An individual stands up and protests against the grooming and rape of underage girls by a statistically proven disproportionate percentage of a specific demograph .
Rather than applaud him and offer our support we demonise him and make him out to be the villain |
|
By:
AT would rather celebrate the conviction and possible incarceration of Mr Robinson than the conviction , incarceration and deportation of those convicted as part of Islamic grooming gangs
 Makes me wonder exactly what makes AT tick  |
|
By:
At least it's a variation from the "just how badly did you do at school" riff he usually wheels out.
 |
|
By:
Now. I'm OFF.
I'm NOT coming back to this thread. You'll need to find some other poor sod to round on. |
|
By:
Incidentally lux and reynard - just how badly did you do at school? and was it your fault or the teachers'?
|
|
By:
Oh go on, just one more post.
|
|
By:
What seems to be the problem here?
Have the judges given a judgement contrary to what the law says in cases of contempt of court? Or you all just p1ssed at how the govt media, and the legal system seems to protect muslims(grooming gangs in particular)? |
|
By:
Study
Before you go (again!) Please can I have your thoughts on my posts yesterday at 22.15 and 23.35. It would mean a great deal. Thanks |
|
By:
I don’t know if I have read any of Reynard’s posts, but I remember Lux. Not many get the better of him on here. Questioning his education just looks like the desperate act of a loser IMO.
|
|
By:
I didn't go to school so much A_T, left with a solitary English Language O level - Grade B.
Got a couple of degrees since though if that helps? |
|
By:
7 O'levels , 2 A-levels . No College or University . Straight into work . Building Surveyor 5 years , Racecourse bookmaker 25 years . I've learnt more since I left school than when I was there , if that helps
 |
|
By:
Were you disruptive in class?
|
|
By:
SF clueless. Gets something in his head and, believing he's never wrong, unleashes it on the forum.
Mob rule? Even has time for semantics. Nationalist not Patriotic. A bit of Freud. Little thug with a Napoleon complex. (Can think of a few complexes SF got) Yer on a forum ffs.  |