Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 277 comments are related to the topic:
Police have arrested two in connection of drone hovering
Police have arrested two in connection of drone hovering
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 277
|
By:
Fiona Bruce ?
|
|
By:
jeez, Reynard whatever happened to freedom of the press? Maybe the nanny state is closer than we think
|
|
By:
They'll be millionaires after this debacle
|
|
By:
according to a pundit reviewing papers on sky last night ,pooh poohing consoiracy stories she said she,d seen footage of the drone on sky,the sky interviewer went silent, do we take it sky just put up any random drone footage in the sky and let the viewers assume it was the drones in question,as the police have said theres no footage of an actual drone,why arnt sky been hammered by government and police
|
|
By:
to have a conspiracy, 1st TP; they all have to be in on it. That's why no 'serious' questions were asked by journos for 3 days. I pummelled some of them on twitter & got not a jot back from anyone. Silence is golden
|
|
By:
The suggestion there may not have been any drones at Gatwick Airport was a "miscommunication by police", a government source has told the BBC.
 Anyone prepared to go on record they saw a drone? |
|
By:
So there was a drone, then no drone, now back to there was a drone again but they can't be sure?
 Every single one of them should be sacked without a pension, their homes taken of them and they should thrown onto Universal Credit If we even f*** up one time at our workplace we are out of there but not this lot, who have a lot more responsibility ffs |
|
By:
what about the" damaged drone" convenently found near the perimeter of the airport ?
|
|
By:
If there were no drones the airlines/airports could face a far bigger compensation bill.
|
|
By:
police forensics giving it a good going over for fingerprints and dna ..........................according to beeb news
|
|
By:
yesterday the police said it was of limited use for evidence because of weather conditions etc, which suggests it didn't fall out of the sky recently,100 sightings,1000,s of police, army, security services, 2 millions worth of tracking gear but we,re led to believe a drone fell from the sky like a butterfly and wasn't seen ,detected by anyone in the vicinity,must be a million the drone was one of those involved if any drone was involved
|
|
By:
They can't shake this story off atm
They keep trying to move onto something else but I think they made a right **** up involving actual citizens on masse like this (in regards to the airport) Plus arresting 2 innocent souls as well, obvious their family have kicked up a right stink |
|
By:
They are talking about bringing in drone detecting technology to try and softly get us on board
There was no sodding drone though? or was there but we ain't sure about it ? Spending millions on technology? who's going to pay for it? How about you use your sodding eyes ffs |
|
By:
On reflection , and given the vast quantities of evidential information now being released to the public , I am now of the opinion that my most bizarre conspiracy theories should now be given even more credence
 |
|
By:
'a' level history question in 100 years from now.
Brexit and drones were the main factors in the Second English civil war breaking out . Discuss. |
|
By:
One can see stars and their cousins a few thousands miles into the sky with a powerful telescope. How could it be possible no definitive id of a drone (video, etc) available despite so many sightings over two days at least? Did no one think this could prove helpful to determine id of the sightings? Surely, Gatwick Airport and authorities concerned could easily obtained telescope for this purpose.
Maybe there truly was no drone being flown on those nights, but merely ufo that looked like "drones" from afar, or inexperienced or dodgy eyes of drink induced individuals. |
|
By:
sky once again showing their drone footage but no mention of who and where it was taken from, initial sightings could have been correct those involved had it on their toes and subsequent sightings hoaxes,would give them 2 days start on police to get away cover their tracks
|
|
By:
It's a great story to deflect away from other goings on. The media love a scare story to go for.
|
|
By:
a favourable interpretation is that the press were asked not to discuss the lack of any real evidence of drones as it would not have gone down well with the thousands sleeping on the floor at Gatwick and may have created a hard-to-manage situation
|
|
By:
That idiot Chris Grayling the transport secretary and Mr Teflon when it came to the Northern Rail Timetable is just the kind of dithering self serving inept minister that we now come to expect. He's strangely reminiscent of the Vicar in Dads Army.
|
|
By:
it utterly befuddles me how this creature still has employment. he's not been fit for purpose in months if not years
|
|
By:
Baphornet - You have failed to take into account that the criteria for public office has changed dramatically over the last half century
|
|
By:
inept isn't even close for grayling , in fact it would be a massive upgrade.
|
|
By:
indeed it has, Reynard. I wonder now the barrel scraping hss been surpassed; what will we find underneath?
|
|
By:
the more you can obfuscate, produce scare stories the better
it does deflect away from what is really happening in our society and strangely the politicoes get away with it and not just the mps but the whole miserable civil service -- self serving service it should be called why do you think the foreign and colonial office is so pro remain |
|
By:
all you have to do is to put a gullible front man (the minister) in front of the real decision making machine
|
|
By:
a white couple are arrested by polis and held for 36 hours with NO evidence and details splattered all over the media to signal they are totally involved and active (BUT WITH NO CLUES OR EVIDENCE - in fact lots to the contrary)
a 19 year old MAN drives into some pedestrians - maiming them - but no pictures ??? can anyone explain why this is the case. |
|
By:
You're not mentally suggesting what I think you might be suggesting?
|
|
By:
no - I am asking fore explanations for why one has full face pics of one and not the other
why the difference - like the cliff richard experience ?? I do have an explanation for the supposed drone incident but am too p!ssed to go into it except to say that in the military there are automatic responses to a sighting or a report which one reacts to IMMEDIATELY. I am assuming the police do like wise and so do quasi military/similar, like airport authorities, and personnel, respond in a similar manner - hence the EXTREME c()ck up if you follow. They then have to try and justify their actions and people within the organisation will attempt to do that. But quite honestly this must be one of the best over reaction upc()ks for ages. |
|
By:
remember the 'I was only following orders' excuse
ps in the military you are NOT allowed to disobey orders I assume it is the same with the polis (although I have no experience of serving in the polis) |
|
By:
It seems the authorities are still adamant drones were in abundance that caused the shutdown of Gatwick Airport to in-coming and out-going flights for 3 days. And now they have drones detection system in place to combat these electronic rascals; £5m spent on equipment and technology to combat this flight nuisance. I wonder if money spent included the purchase of a powerful telescope.
But still no physical evidence of what caused 3 days of disruption at Gatwick Airport. |
|
By:
why no pictures of the two manchester rapists then ?? ah hang on - described as two men - I get it now
pic on two persons of colour not too far from the airport with zilch evidence and - wham there you go stick 'em right in the face of the public to prove something was being done but then there is an agenda |
|
By:
why no pictures of the two manchester rapists then ?? ah hang on - described as two men - I get it now
pic on two persons of colour not too far from the airport with zilch evidence and - wham there you go stick 'em right in the face of the public to prove something was being done but then there is an agenda |
|
By:
The Manual Molesters are a protected species..
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
but we had the culprits splattered all over the media within hours of arrest
why do we not have this every time people who threaten our existence are collared ?? except they are not - so as to not upset the community they are from but fk the crawley community eh!!?? nothing racist about it - oh yes it is most definitely just to show not ALL terrorists are from one group but they fkd up big time here yet again but we can't show the faces of the MEN - it is always the MEN - as soon as I see that I immediately thing of who the group is that indulges so much as part of their culture we are losing - but I think you know that |
|
By:
thing - read think of
|
|
By:
I think I heard a report somewhere or other there was word of an imminent terrorist attack and the feds used drones as an excuse to prevent panic.
I might have misheard. |
|
By:
^ more tripe
|
|
By:
Thanks for confirming I misheard.
Did anyone ever tell you that you have a way with words?  |