Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 277 comments are related to the topic:
Police have arrested two in connection of drone hovering
Police have arrested two in connection of drone hovering
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 277
|
By:
LFC is a paranoid schizophrenic who has opposing voices in his head.
He’s like Gollum. |
|
By:
He's probably a Gemini.
|
|
By:
ultimately someone knows who is responsible it should be possible for everyone who owns a drone in Britain to be interviewed by the police and simply give an account of where they where
What’s difficult about that ? |
|
By:
lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 12:45 PM GMT
the British courts will decide who is guilty and who isn’t of course That’s good You are aware that the British Judicial system is corrupt and even innocent people have been jailed whilst criminals are free to walk the streets ? |
|
By:
ah , I think this couple have been realised without charge so no idea what you are on about
|
|
By:
Of course if you are saying that no one can be taken to court then I am afraid that’s doesn’t seem to make any sense to me
|
|
By:
What were you saying again ?
|
|
By:
Chit Chat proved right again. Plod clueless.
Tactics: Arrest a drone owner and hope they're guilty. No privacy - DM a disgrace. Names and pictures should have NOT been released. |
|
By:
They'll get a day in the sun, a good few grand and a chance to see failure at it's finest. Not too bad for a night in the cells.
|
|
By:
Vlad is laughing at us !
|
|
By:
His little X-mas present !
|
|
By:
Maybe there's something about this time of year and people getting lifted, their names dragged through the gutter by a hysterical media, then released.
It was christmas time a few years back when that woman was murdered and her landlord (who had einstein like hair so was "odd") was dragged apart by the media then of course found to be totall innocent. Other countries don't release the names of those questioned, why does our country do it? And while I'm on the subject, why is that leftie hand wringers think it's MARVELOUS that 16 year olds should get the vote, they are apparently "adults" capable of making impoortant decisions about our country, they should vote in like EU and Scottish referendums, but if they r@pe and murder someone, they are suddenly not adults, their actions are those of children, and their details can't be released even after convictopn? We've had two high profile cases just like that in the past year or so. And please don't start trying to name them here..... |
|
By:
Their name would not have been released if the first two letters were an 'M' and an 'O'
 |
|
By:
Mollie? Morag?
|
|
By:
You are completely aware what I mean . Some are offered greater protection than others , even when the crimes are very serious in nature .
|
|
By:
British law applies equally to all
|
|
By:
lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 1:54 PM GMT
British law applies equally to all In theory , yes ..... But in practice , NO |
|
By:
any examples ?
|
|
By:
Yes , plenty , unfortunately
 |
|
By:
go ahead ...
|
|
By:
Go ahead what ?
|
|
By:
an example , any particular court case
|
|
By:
If there is no "inside information", the perpetrators will never be caught! If the reward doesn't bring them out into the open nothing will. I believe there is something more to all of this but I'm not sure what. The drone attack was very well organised, one even flew around the control tower and flashed its lights at the controllers. These were not £200 toys with a battery life of 20 minutes. Let's see how it all pans out, if anything.
|
|
By:
Melanie Shaw - incarcerated indefinitely without trial .
Her crime ? Highlighting the sexual abuse and murder of children within the Nottingham care home where she was resident . |
|
By:
''Gatwick Airport Limited has now offered a £50,000 reward through Crimestoppers for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for disrupting flights.''
That would hardly compensate for getting your head chopped off in a car park if were terrorists. |
|
By:
I don’t fell like looking into the case Reynard and I don’t believe your interpretation of it , sorry
|
|
By:
thegiggilo 22 Dec 18 21:35
They look far to thick to be the sorts who wouldv'e done it.  |
|
By:
Reynard • December 23, 2018 1:56 PM GMT
lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 1:54 PM GMT British law applies equally to all In theory , yes ..... But in practice , NO lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 1:57 PM GMT any examples ? Reynard • December 23, 2018 2:05 PM GMT Melanie Shaw - incarcerated indefinitely without trial . Her crime ? Highlighting the sexual abuse and murder of children within the Nottingham care home where she was resident . lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 2:08 PM GMT I don’t fell like looking into the case Reynard and I don’t believe your interpretation of it This is precisely why you continue to post some of the most uninformed opinions on the forum  |
|
By:
And I I said , I can assure you that your interpretation of that case as you have just stated will be wrong
don’t allow yourself to believe anything else |
|
By:
Ok lfc1971 , how about The Hillsborough Inquiry (Chief Justice Taylor 1990) .
You don't need to do much research there , the massive injustice common knowledge |
|
By:
Holmes used to say :"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Well I think we can safely say we HAVE eliminated all other possibilities and it comes back to this: Corbyn sent it to take pictures of Manhole covers. |
|
By:
You want examples , I provide one and you're too scared to look into it . I didn't offer an interpretation either way . You say the british justice system is fair , I say otherwise , You ask for examples and I provide one . Then you say you "don't feel like looking into it" .
That is precisely why you spout nonsense on here . You know very little and you make no effort to educate and inform yourself . |
|
By:
we know what happened at hillsborough , the Taylor report and other inquirers have got to the truth as best we can
What’s wrong with that ? |
|
By:
Reynard the case you mentioned and your interpretation of that case as you have stated it is wrong
That is certain before anyone even looks at the case |
|
By:
Stop wasting my time , and everybody else's time with your uninformed views
 |
|
By:
your wasting your own time if you continue to come out with nonsense like that
I could look into the case , I might do , I know before I do that I can’t trust your version of it That’s all |
|
By:
Reynard • December 23, 2018 1:56 PM GMT
lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 1:54 PM GMT British law applies equally to all In theory , yes ..... But in practice , NO lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 1:57 PM GMT any examples ? Reynard • December 23, 2018 2:05 PM GMT Melanie Shaw - incarcerated indefinitely without trial . Her crime ? Highlighting the sexual abuse and murder of children within the Nottingham care home where she was resident . lfc1971 • December 23, 2018 2:08 PM GMT I don’t fell like looking into the case Reynard and I don’t believe your interpretation of it This is precisely why you continue to post some of the most uninformed opinions on the forum |
|
By:
your not listening are you Reynard , I merely said that I don’t trust your interpretation of that case , as you have just stated it
that’s clear , sorry |
|
By:
Then do your own research into the case of Melanie Shaw and draw your own conclusions . What do you fear ?
I didn't offer this example . You asked me to provide an example . TWICE . |
|
By:
That’s fine , I might do
I can assure you you have not given an honest or good interpretation in your description of that case That’s evident just by reading your words |