^ Academia and the Judicary are under the control of looney lefties in America and EU.
Thats why they are trying every trick in the book (and not in the book even ) to stop conservative leaning Brett Kavanaugh from getting into the Supreme Court.

Trump mocks the Ford testimony at a rally, days after saying that she was credible. Once again demonstrating that he is a pathetic weak man who craves approval so much he will do almost anything to get it.

I think you must have forgotten to also mention the lies told by Christine Ford under oath.

Fixed that for you.

Kavanaugh accusers start to have second thoughts about lying when questioned by FBI investigators. Oh dear again.

Michael Avenatti suddenly gone very quiet about Julie Swetnik. You know, the woman who was "highly credible" last week according to the Trump-hating lawyer. Come on CNN, have him back on to offer his latest thoughts on the matter.

Everyone in the world has been drunk at some time and everyone has become angry at some time, that’s life

Being drunk is not the problem, it is what is alleged he did while drunk.

Christine Ford's testimony has been completely discredited, shown up for the politically motivated lies it has always been from start to finish. She should count herself lucky to be allowed to walk away from her lies without punishment. Genuine abuse victims have been done no favours by Ford.

When he said he never attended a gathering as described by ford that is not a lie
He attended many parties so that was always clear , therefor he wasn’t lying

I don't know how you can say his claiming not to have attended a gathering as described by Ford is not a lie, when his own calendar showed he attended such an event with some of the same people cited, on the 1st July. Therefore he was lying.

The Democrats began distancing themselves from Michael Avenatti and his client, Julie Swetnik, as soon as her past history of fake allegations were exposed. Avenatti must have been desperate, one could barely imagine a lesser credible witness.

Pokermonster which fake allegations?
This thread may be of interest here, if this is what you are referring to:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047163653110321153.html

@ 10.51am

So who is Drumpf, Chump, baby donny, cheese burger, two scoops then ?
The left are always referring to this person, who could it be ?

Step off the moral high ground before you get vertigo

This is the last thing I'll say on this matter. Brett Kavanaugh should not be on the SCOTUS, indeed his own statements under oath should make him ineligible for the position he already holds. It's not the many proveable lies he so readily told, though those should preclude him; it's not that he has been accused by more than one person of sexual assault; it's not even dodgy dealings over debts disappearing and club fees:
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/the-many-mysteries-of-brett-kavanaughs-; no, what should preclude him is clear impartiality.
When the Republicans are in power they appoint a right leaning justice, and when the Democrats are in, they appoint a left, that's to be expected. What Kavanaugh said in his hearing wasn't just leaning, it had toppled over into crazy town conspiracy theories. He hysterically stated that "This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups," and 'what goes around comes around.'
Rule 1.2, American Bar Association Model Code of Judicial Conduct states: 'A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence,* integrity,* and impartiality* of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.'

Kavanaugh will in all likelihood be promoted to SCOTUS due to the 'Nuclear Option' created by Grassley and this GOP, which reduces the requirement from 60 Senate votes down to 51 and also in small part to a very limited FBI investigation that will give rise to little new evidence.

Comprehensive and accurate summation. Delightful in fact.

They are as merciless as the Nazis and communists

Delightful • October 3, 2018 10:21 AM BST
Everyone in the world has been drunk at some time and everyone has become angry at some time, that’s life

Being drunk is not the problem, it is what is alleged he did while drunk.


The problem with that is that everyone of the Democrats assumed guilt based on the testimony alone. Their lines of questioning were about painting a picture of a man that 'blacked out' and generally assumed the character of a person who may potentially do the acts which were alleged.

Therefore they made their minds up and based their opinions on the heavy drinking being representative of an abuser.
How does blacking out from drink prove somebody is a sexual threat exactly? After all somebody blacked out is zero threat at all.

The problem here is that an agenda was appeased, a narrative drawn that people might believe is convincing, that 'they all do it don't they, these types of people'.
Thats confirmation bias Im afraid. The Democrats found a cause that they invested in to carry the argument to get the guy thrown out, and dismissed all possibility of 'innocence' in the process.

Nellie why bring sexism into it? Where is my post sexist? I happen to believe that anyone who resorts to childish name calling, especially when the nicknames are copied from others, have shown themselves to be very easily influenced and not a little immature.

I think this Kavanaugh fellow is done for.

I don't care if he got drunk, was a nasty drunk or was obnoxious. You cannot prove he attacked the Prof unless Mark Judge verifies what really happened if it did at all to be fair but we have all made our minds up on that.

For me I believe Kavanaugh lied about the extent of his drinking but that is not proof although contemporaries at Harvard have given accounts of his drunken behaviour.

His anger being questioned under oath was alarming for me. How can this man be dispassionate. His lack of respect for the woman Senator who questioned his drinking habits was illuminating. His political bias was exposed blaming a democrat Plot or the Clintons seeking revenge.

How can this man judge others?

Even Law professors have written stating he is not an acceptable candidate for the Supreme Court. You lot defending him expose your own prejudice and stupidity. Goodnight!

Forget any sexual allegations. Why would you want that man as a Supreme Court Judge?

You might have thought that SS and you might well be right.
But equally I watched a woman give testimony like it was the night previous ffs.
Shes had 36 years, and she still cant speak normally?
That to me isnt right.

Well said Dustybin.

So do you think Kavanaugh is a good choice of Supreme Court Judge and has the confidence of the people and can be relied upon to be impartial?