Chit Chat
I hate the liberal left (A view on Tommy Robinson)
|
By:
Dr Crippen 07 Aug 18 22:06
Who is this FACTS? He's going to a lot of trouble here and getting worked up. It's a pity we can't see his face. I'm not going to a lot of trouble ( it's called cut and paste), and I'm certainly not ' worked up ' But I'm certainly glad I can't see your mug ! |
|
By:
^^There's another Britanniaphobe.
|
|
By:
It appears that jed davidson has been banned. Anyone own up?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
So, someone who believed you, (as a known squealer), have a history of having people banned, is himself banned? The very day after he embarrasses you? And, as usual, you`re on, protesting just that little bit too much, full of self-justification for previous grassing form? Hmmm...
|
|
By:
1.01 landed.
You're now becoming the biggest weasel and snidey, pathetic troll on here. |
|
By:
Let's see how you manage to ignore that you made all that stuff up.
Like you make up everything you post on here. timbuctooth I've never had anyone banned. I reported a post once, from akabula, who I told in advance. which led to a post being removed. The rest of what you've written is sad troll nonsense. Among your greatest enjoyment is to irritate people. This speaks volumes about the sort of person you are. Pitiful. |
|
By:
STUDYFORM 08 Aug 18 01:08
Let's see how you manage to ignore that you made all that stuff up. Really? Well, here`s `that stuff`, let`s analyse it, shall we? `So, someone who believed you, (as a known squealer), have a history of having people banned` Well, that`s what you told us in your previous post? Was that not true? Were you lying? `...is himself banned?` This appears to be true, does it not? `...The very day after he embarrasses you?` If he`s banned, this is also true `...And, as usual, you`re on, protesting just that little bit too much, full of self-justification for previous grassing form?` Again, your own previous post confirms this, so were you lying? Again? You`re a grass, a liar and a leftie, (not sure which is worst!), so I`ll leave it to the forum to look at the evidence, weigh it all up most carefully and impartially, then to send you down! |
|
By:
jed davison's forum profile is alive and accessible, which usually isn't the case when someone has been banned I think. What's the reason that people think he's been banned?
|
|
By:
timbuctooth. Sad, pathetic troll.
edy, because of stewarty b's 10.56 post. |
|
By:
Not banned, just been away for a couple of days, very pleasant stay in Brandon Lewis country.
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
You hanker for crash-Brexit and the dissolution of the EU. This is the narrative of the disaster-capitalists like Crispin Odey, who bankrolled Brexit, made a killing overnight on the 2016 referendum and are teeing up the UK for a bigger hit next March.
I'm not saying you are an architect of their vision of Brexit, jed, but are certainly one of their useful idiots. Firstly, I do not hanker for crash Brexit - I have been telling you, as I'm sure you recall clearly, since the day after the referendum that we would be unable to reach a deal with the European Union over the terms of our departure. Almost two and a half years later, far from being closer to a deal we are in fact further away than ever from reaching one. You are correct that I hanker for the dissolution of the EU - despite there being some good reasons for its founding, I'm afraid that the real agenda of its architects has long since been revealed to those from whom it was originally deliberately obscured. This is no simple trading bloc, it is a long-term project designed to remove power from the Nation States of Europe and deliver it into the hands of those who believe they are meant to rule us - people like our very own arch-traitor Edward Heath. It is a corrupt, anti-democratic cesspool, and the peoples of Europe will, within the next decade, see to its dissolution. Whether you believe or disbelieve any of the above explanation, wishing to see the demise of the European Union does not make me far-Right, and you only succeed in making yourself look a clueless fanatic by labelling me thus. |
|
By:
I've no idea where Stew got that from. I clicked on Jed's name when I saw the post and his details were still intact. What made you think he was barred, Stew?
|
|
By:
If Jed were to be banned, it would not be because he has made outrageous posts, but the fact that he is a card carrying Tottenham fan.
 |
|
By:
I don't believe there is such a thing
|
|
By:
What made you think he was barred, Stew? Having followed the thread I noticed jed had not posted for a while and when I put his name in the search engine it came back 'no matches found'. Thankfully I was mistaken.
|
|
By:
How you doing stewarty? Thanks for your concern btw.
|
|
By:
Doing fine jed. A bit gutted with the result on Saturday as Gerrard seems to be the man albeit early doors. Top four finish for Spurs I presume?
|
|
By:
Depends on Sarri for me - Arsenal will finish sixth, if Sarri can get them playing quickly enough then Chelsea are a danger, if not should be reasonably comfortable.
|
|
By:
** Nice easy game to start with. (or should be)
|
|
By:
Odds against across the board, I have invested heavily and will have the lot on City on Sunday.
|
|
By:
Whether you believe or disbelieve any of the above explanation, wishing to see the demise of the European Union does not make me far-Right, and you only succeed in making yourself look a clueless fanatic by labelling me thus.
Extreme sensitivity over being labelled far-right seems like a defining characteristic of that faction. To the rest of us, it is a useful description: Conservatives broadly fit the label of Right, so it is reasonable to identify the faction to the Right of them as far-right. Individuals may bridle at the label and think themselves indifferent to the far-right agenda but, as mentioned to Insider Trader, the vast majority are cribbing from the same online "sources", and sound remarkably similar. For example, trending now among the far-right claque is "No-deal Brexit will be damaging but it is inevitable." |
|
By:
Good luck with those bets jed. Personally I would be happy to collect from the first bet. City look a cert but I would rather look on as these teams coming up from the Championship can often spring a surprise......aka Burnley.
|
|
By:
You cannot even define 'far-right' UB.
What values do you suggest the 'far-right' have? |
|
By:
A simplistic explanation, about as good as I could have hoped for I suppose, but I'm still somewhat baffled that you think I am to the right of the Tory Party. I voted for Ed Miliband in 2015, do you know any other 'Far-Right' people who did that?
I feel sorry for you that you have had your noise put out of joint by all the little people defying your will on June 23rd 2016 - so out of joint in fact that you have railed against their decision every day since they defied you. Not wishing to remain a part of the EU does not make one Far Right. Using the medium of an anonymous internet forum to vent one's spleen daily at a democratic vote does, however, make you a bit of a sad act. |
|
By:
That does make you an outlier, jed.
You may not be quite the identikit far-right footsoldier. However, wittingly or otherwise, many serve the far-right agenda, of which Brexit is the jewel in the crown. |
|
By:
What values do you suggest the 'far-right' have?
In fine, the far-right are intent on removing the barrier between the lamb and the lion. |
|
By:
People take exception at the term far-right because it has been used to describe Nazism.
The BNP were described as far-right yet the bulk of their policies were socialist. Tommy Robinson is described as far-right because he targets an ethnic group for his exposures. So by that reckoning, todays Labour party qualifies to be called far-right for the anti-Semitism in its ranks which is ripping the party apart. |
|
By:
You cannot put Robinson's concerns about terrorism and rape gangs on a par with anti-Semitism. One is concerned about horrific crimes. The other is not.
|
|
By:
They both target specific ethnic groups, so if that is the criterion used then they both qualify.
There has to be some criterion, and that definition seems to trump all the others. |
|
By:
Is that the thing, Dr Crippen? Is that why you style yourselves “Centrists”?
Bit misleading, like Nazis styling themselves socialists. Far-right is more honest. |
|
By:
UB,
So you don't think that Tommy Robinson should be included in the far right? |
|
By:
And while you're at it, explain why the BNP are called far right if the same definition is not the overriding factor that applies to their classification?
|
|
By:
Tommy Robinson, far-Right.
BNP, far-Right. EDL, far-Right. Breibart/Bannon/Trump, far-Right. IDS, far-Right. Rees-Mogg, far-Right. Minford, far-Right. Farage, far-Right. Cummings, far-Right. Banks, far-Right. If Conservatives are of the Right, then those to the right of them may usefully be termed far-Right. You mustn't confuse populist initiatives with the underlying values of any movement, any politicians. The Third-Reich built some great swimming pools for the people. |
|
By:
Right = Correct .
Not sure what 'far' relates to in this context  |
|
By:
How is your definition of far-right UB?
If you cannot define something how can you use it as a label? |