donny osmond
03 Jun 18 20:49
Joined: 02 Mar 08
| Topic/replies: 76,474 | Blogger: donny osmond's blog
surely if he had his own solicitor or barrister he who have warned him after his suspended sentence ?



we've had all that on the thread before it

are you aware of legal procedure in uk?

^


You have cases of people taking films inside the court or doing their own research on defendants when they are on jury service or contacting defendants while on the jury getting less time in prison.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44307037

Donny do you have a link to the current list of on going cases subject to these extra restrictions?

All a load of nonsense. Purely done to protect a certain faith.
All the arguments fall apart when you consider those cases not only covered but advertised.
Might prejudice future trials. Say something else surfaces about Cliff or Harris. Doesn't seem to be a problem with them.

when was cliffs trial?

well you mentioned him

Well spotted, I did mention him and your point is?

PorcupineorPineapple
03 Jun 18 22:12
Joined: 03 Dec 15
| Topic/replies: 4,882 | Blogger: PorcupineorPineapple's blog
Are Blacks a race wolf?

When people were throwing bananas at footballers was it only reserved for certain nationalities. When Stephen Lawrence was murdered was it because of where his ancestors were from?

Sorry bud, but if you're grouping all muslims together and hating on them then you're racist. It's that simple. You may be happy with that. Certainly some seem quite comfortable with it lately.

^

Are all followers of Scientology a race? Are all Christians a race?

I'd imagone they'd keep that close to their chest IT.

If it wss rumoured that a famous footballer had restrictions on his case but we could see a list of 5 ongoing restricted cases and one was Spears v Giggs and that could be known and reported far and wide it would defeat the purpose a touch.

IT - if you want to get down to brass tacks there are no such things as races. There is nothing genetic that connects you, me and a few million others as Brits. Doesn't exist. Therefore the British aren't a race. Races are merely political tools used by the powerful to either corral a group together or drive a wedge between people.

An interesting topic when you get under its skin.

stephen lawrence the only racist murder ever.... according to the bbc FILTH

The judges says where? In the court? How does someone standing outside the court reading stuff off another public website know these restrictions are in suddenly in place?

its reporters job to find out

Fooball Marches Appear to be attracting Gay couples  the Disabled and some non white People , Now its strange that the BBc 

is not Covering that kind of Diversity, or a Seikh man infront of a Diverse crowd saying he agrees with Robinson 'A few Cheers from

Tommy's Supporters but certainly no negative cheers from what was a crowd with Black people and what appeared asian People

in it,

As the Main speaker was condemning Pedo Rapists not Surprising ,But once again not the Kind of Diversity our luvvie friends

want to see .

Donny beat me to it.

Ignorance is no excuse.

It's beholden on the news org, or ad seller with an iPhone, to inform himself before jumping in. I believe reporters are allowed in to cover the trial, they juat can't file copy till the ban is lifted.

why would it be an attack , hes merely included everybody as having to obey
the same restrictions

be it a friend of a witness looking for a selfie or cnn

are you really not aware ?

there you go

i can test you on it next week if you like


https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/reporting-restrictions-guide-may-2016-2.pdf

I try and make allowances for you being incredibly dim , but if you are classifying religion as a " race " than someone criticising Tom cruises scientology as nonsense would be a " racist". Put the little racism drum down, and realise people are rightly criticising a barbaric cult and not the colour of someones skin using your silly banana analogy there's a good lad.


You do understand there's a bit of a diffetence between criticising a faith and denigrating everyone who follows it? Imo, Islam - like them all - is daft. Ramadam, veils, pork, booze. Why choose to place such arbitrary obstacles in your path on your short time on earth? Now if you instead say all scientologists are crazed sheep botherers then that is racist. That's the (fairly huge and unmissable to most) difference. If you make spurious claims like "these guys are paedophiles and are also muslims therefore a huge number of muslims must be paedos then that is discrimination and if you make it on the grounds of religion it is racism. If you don't believe me check the laws. Say derogatory comments about muslims in Hyde Park Corner and you'll be done for inciting racial hatred, not anti-religious hatred.



As for your races v racism comment, I thought someone woukd run with that and to be honest you were odds on.

I'll keep it simple. There's no such thing as race, such as an English race. Not genetically or biologically speaking. It is a political construct.

There is such a thing as racism. Because racism is simply the name given to prejudice against others based on their nationality, skin colour or religion. It's actually fairly broad.

who could disagree with that