LH saying  the first thing came into his mind is telling people how to live their lives, i have never read something so ridiculous.

I don't see DStyle trying to silence anyone. Much rather he was attemping to have a sensible discussion. Little did he know that something like that is and always has been impossible with you, mobbo.

Oh, I see you corrected me on the spelling of your previous username. True, it was mobo, not mobbo. Sorry, perfectly innocent mistake and certainly not done on purpose.

Have you seen what happens to young people who get  confused over their sexuality or body image.

Is there not a possibility that people are becoming confused because they want to do one thing, but being told that they shouldn't do that thing as it is not "right" and should do something else instead.

Here are a couple of questions for anyone who wants to answer

Q when did you decide that you were going to be heterosexual and not hom0sexual (or vice versa)
Q do you think that if you had been brought up differently your sexuality would be different.

At this point I think it's an appropriate moment to remind us all that there are only two genders, male and female. There is absolutely nothing for any young (or old) person to be 'confused' about.

Hope that helps.

If you stop and think it is almost frightening to think that parents could permit it

And the mother should have more sense and caring also

There is an entire industry out there which nauseatingly and inexplicably seeks to persuade them that they are neither male or female, and that they are not heterosexual.

Look at it from the bright side. Gay youngsters need to hide much less than used to be the case. It's also much easier to free yourself from the harmful religious indoctrination than in days thankfully gone by. No more entire church industry that nauseatingly and inexplicably seeks to persuade them that they are an abomination for no good reason other than some random dude once upon a time putting it into foetid book written thousands of years ago. Wait, actually there still is that industry. Not to mention

Furthermore, while media coverage has increased dramatically, violence among young people is actually down compared to decades of the past. If we're being honest, today's youngsters are by and large much more civilised and better than us rascals were.

Additionally, while there might be increased emphasis in our societies to make sure to communicate that being yourself is ok and you don't need to hide, I wouldn't say it's nauseating or that it's trying to persuade people to suddenly want dick instead of ****. Or that there's any real effort to persuade people they're neither male nor female.

Instead there's an industry that persuades girls to use makeup at an ever younger age. There's a new Kinder egg specifically made for girls. An entire Disney Princesses franchise and all that kinda stuff that actually caters specifically to girls (though occasionally you might get a boy inspired by the movies and want to dress up as one of those heroines. That's how cool they are). And more so than used to be the case. I don't remember growing up and girls having all these unicorns, awesome shows like Wishenpoof, Disney heroines (ranging from rather girly to brave Moana) that teach them women can be cool and awesome too (i.e it's ok to be a girl) or them using makeup at like 4 years old.

Overall, it must be pretty darn good to be young.

IS - It’s about consistency. The action of Hamilton is the same as the action of other individuals. Hamilton expressed an opinion “boys shouldn’t wear dresses” and shared it with the public. Other people expressed an opinion “Hamilton I think you are wrong boys should be allowed to wear dresses if they want to” and shared it with the public. As moisok pointed out that Dstyle and the media were “telling the majority how to live their lives”, I thought that as it’s the same action then Hamilton must also be “telling people how to live their lives”.

So when you say “LH saying  the first thing came into his mind is telling people how to live their lives, i have never read something so ridiculous.” I assume what you must be saying is that “LH saying  the first thing came into his mind is telling people how to live their lives, is the most equally ridiculous thing I’ve read along with "But unfortunately dstyle and his friends in the media seem obsessed with thrashing you constantly with their strange need to tell the majority how to run their lives."

Look Hamilton had an opinion and shared it with the public. Certain members of the public had an opinion and shared it with the public. If you object to the principle of one you object to the principle of the other. If you find one action outrageous then you should find the other action outrageous as well. I have no moral outrage with Hamilton, I don’t wish to silence anyone , I have no political agenda, I am making no statement on how the media report or not report information, I just disagree with Hamilton’s opinion.

In religion some would say ;  God doesn’t make mistakes. When He fashioned you in your mother’s womb with the care of that of an artist making His one and only greatest masterpiece, God took delight in choosing the things that make you uniquely you. If you feel like there was some big mistake when you were created, then let’s just be brutally honest and say that we don’t share the same definition of God. If God is an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving Father, it is impossible for Him to make mistakes because it would be contrary to His nature. God created you male or female for a reason.

I believe the BBC banned her work , that's all you need to know
So much for free speech

on an island, having an adventure , camping, down by the sea , getting into trouble, having a wonderful time ..
Not much angst there , what's wrong with that ?
I don't know

I'm not sure you could Read Enid Blyton to youngsters anymore. She liberally used the word 'gay', in the traditional meaning of happy and carefree. It was ok in the 90s, my young daughter was unaware the word had been hijacked. Youngsters may be rather confused by it, now they are rushed into being made aware of homosexuality.

^ that's wrong, see how people will believe what they want to believe ?
She was banned as early as the 1930s , not one of her stories was ever broadcast
She was banned by the 'educationalists' at the BBC
Perhaps she was too English , nevertheless she sold millions of books

I suppose some silly individuals might look down their nose at Christie , or even Shakespeare if they could get away with it

Blyton was not even permitted to be interviewed on woman's hour , once again the 'educationalists' however they are
would not permit her voice to be heard
Nothing much changes at the BBC

Erich Kästner is where it's at.

The novel Edith Blyton was writing was always the same novel , it was an English novel that's why people loved it ,in England , and many countries throughout the world
And perhaps that is why the BBC hated it

It's all about a minority of people 'torch bearing' for a group.  They use it politically. It makes them feel good.  Backing everyone into a corner.  Politicians etc, so no one dare utter a word.
Very few of them are so called trans and very few know what it is like to be part of that group and what we want.
Your language and culture is forcefully being changed by them as they seize the narrative on many issues.
And people on here actually welcome it.

of course they have to be 'outraged' but not on my behalf and a lot of others.