|
By:
BBC having orgasms that Katie has been sacked. Sums up their dangerous, suicidal narrative.
They show more hatred towards her than the bomber on wednesday night. |
|
By:
I was searching for your post Study,from before, where you claimed you were not to be PC. Sadly the fred has gone.
Unless you are a mind reader you cannot know in which term she used those words, unless you have an opinion before her words. |
|
By:
You haven't been watching TV or listening to the radio much for the last few days then.
|
|
By:
I saw Katie Hopkins tweet.
I don't need an opinion - the use of "Final Solution" is out of order. Don't you think? And this is ALL I'm talking about. ALL I've talked about on the whole subject. Nothing else is relevant. |
|
By:
Incidentally, it's been used on this forum a couple of times too - but then it's not unexpected given the state of this place and the role-models chosen.
|
|
By:
STUDYFORM
You can go feck yourself, saddo. It is no accident. You and any other tw@t promoting any Final solution are not worthy of having it spelt out. The only interesting thing here is how fecking stupid you are. SF claims that he never insults other posters. |
|
By:
Yes it was a bad use of our language SF but you've used more passion in denouncing this than the atrocity.
|
|
By:
Call me ignorant, i did not know the exact phrase. I studied history but this one missed me. Probably why the internet delayed on her ban.
As would a high percentage of the population. |
|
By:
It has nothing to do with language - It is a deliberately chosen phrase.
Why are you looking to me to denounce anything? ffs |
|
By:
Study, do you remember your post when you said you were not PC, ask my friends etc ?
|
|
By:
Yes, Sonko, but what does it have to do with what I'm talking about?
|
|
By:
Hey, studyform; what a glorious example of the way leftie losers conflate the truth with their own wilful misinterpretation of that truth, and then re-interpret that version as ever-escalatingly bad prima facie evidence of `fake news`, which can and will then be echo-chambered and Chinese Whispered into something it never was. Do you work for CNN?
What Katie wrote; `final solution` What studyform wrote as the initial mistruth, priming the second and crucial mistruth, which will then be peddled with ever-increasing faux outrage; STUDYFORM 26 May 17 20:52 You and any other tw@t promoting any Final solution are not worthy of having it spelt out. Note the capitalisation of the `f`, which Katie hadn`t used. And then, to close the deal and forever damn her, the clincher; STUDYFORM 26 May 17 21:11 Just that it's wrong to ever use the expression 'Final Solution' And ,Hey Presto, there you have it! An everyday phrase, magically, and without anyone noticing, has become something horrific. This is what we`re dealing with, my fellow `on the right, in the right` decent folk. Pitiful behaviour, but hugely risible, so thanks for that, studyform. Chortle, chortle, chortle! |
|
By:
You chose the word advocate, means you have prior views. She posted once those terms.
You seem like a mind reader. |
|
By:
It really doesn't matter how many ways you lot bat it back to me, in differing ways.
This is REALLY SIMPLE. Even you can understand it. The use of the phrase "Final Solution" has no place in any way as advocation of a good idea. "Katie" HAD used it. and then changed the post saying she mis-typed and changed it to "True solution". You timbuctooth can alter as many facts as you like. I couldn't give a shoite about fatuous game show losers like Hopkins, but if as public recommendation or a sign of how we should behave someone suggests the "Final Solution" then I will call it as it is - Out of order and wrong. Others on here have used it too. It's still fecking out of order and wrong. That so many of you need to defend it simply puts you in the camp you seem to love being in. |
|
By:
STUDYFORM 26 May 17 21:20
... "Final Solution" ... STUDYFORM 26 May 17 21:31 ...Final Solution... See how they build it, trying to impose it as the `truth`? Scandalous and shameful. |
|
By:
And FYI TimbucTooth
The use of Capitals is of ABSOLUTELY NO consequence. |
|
By:
English not your first language? Are you therefore going to blame the boll0x you spout on Google Translate?
|
|
By:
So in a maths class, a student may say 'I have a final solution', he is expelled ?
|
|
By:
Oh she and the people on this forum who were saying it were answering a maths problem?
With an archaic unused expression no-one ever uses. And I'm accused of talking bollix. |
|
By:
You're not very bright with an analogy like that, Ibra.
She was sacked because she clearly crossed a line, she will probably find another platform to air her nonsense, in the mean time you still have Tommy I have a new book out Robinson. |
|
By:
No point in reasoning, s_h, she works for the Daily mail and can say no wrong.
|
|
By:
What I'm not seeing on here is anyone agreeing that the use of the term is wrong.
Just a few people defending it. Trying to twist it, having a go at me, pretending no-one ever said (or typed) it, making like it was never said.... but not actually saying it shouldn't be said. Which leads me to believe you think it's OK. Is it? |
|
By:
Except boxingthefox
![]() |
|
By:
STUDYFORM 26 May 17 20:52
You can go feck yourself, saddo. It is no accident. You and any other tw@t promoting any Final solution are not worthy of having it spelt out. --------------- Please do c&p my use of the term, and when you cannot, you may perhaps withdraw your slander, tia. Anger issues are not an excuse for blatant lies. |
|
By:
saddo • May 26, 2017 8:48 PM BST
"This makes you worse than the people you're having a go at." Using an inflamatory phrase, whether accidentaly or deliberately, is worse than blowing people to smithereeens? An interesting view What's the inflammatory phrase then? Accidentally? |
|
By:
So I'm assuming that the pop at my interesting view was about an inflammatory phrase.
Did I get the wrong inflammatory phrase? |
|
By:
You would look less foolish if you retracted and apologised. I won't hold my breath.
|
|
By:
For what exactly?
What was the inflammatory phrase you thought was OK to use. I wasn't comparing the 2 things. In condemning the use of the phrase, I'm not somehow OKing any other actions, behaviours or happening. Utter condemnation of the bombing and everything does not detract from condemnation of the use of the term "final solution" (no Caps). |
|
By:
'Final solution'
![]() Study please tell me what you interpret this phrase to actually mean and why you are so angry because you haven't done so, yet. |
|
By:
I'm not akabula - you'd just get a little stiffy from thinking I was somehow defeated - Like a sort of lost challenge.
I'm not imploding, I'm not in a challenge. |
|
By:
You don't know what it is moneyshot?
|
|
By:
Any chance of answering the question ?
|
|
By:
Mate on my daughter's life I didn't, maybe you are looking at this too subjectively, but if it's commonly associated with the death camps then I apologise but maybe not evrybody is aware of the historical context as you were, I wasn't.
|
|
By:
He needs a shrink to sort them anger issues out, m8.
|
|
By:
I promise you moneyshot, it has ONLY got connotations with the death camps, despite attempts to claim the contrary.
I'm not the only one to think its use is wrong, but quite a few on here, as you can see will defend it - in slight part to have an argument in part because they're stupid. So, I'm sorry moneyshot, I thought you were just joining in. |
|
By:
No worries dude, thanks.
|
|
By:
Good piece on Hopkins/British Values/Manchester Atrocity
. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/26/heroic-black-humour-hatred-choose-british-values |
|
By:
" Abu Hopkins" rofl, was this paper not writing about the human rights of those Islamic preachers we were trying to get rid of years ago?
|
|
By:
fact is, most people wouldn't have thought nazi when they hear or read that phrase - its 2 very common words put together.
they had to be told/reminded that there was a historical reference. we will never know whether Hopkins meant it. the only thing we do know is that it dawned on her afterwards that it might be construed that way. one doesn't prove the other. |
|
By:
Coz she made a stupid comment does not mean she should be stopped from speaking out. She is only one of a very few people who are. The rest are too scared because of loosing their jobs. If you think she is a threat in any form of Nazism you should check out the people she opposes. Some of them even sided with the Nazis in WWII and their attitude to gays etc are exactly the same.#
Just for starters. |