Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 445 comments are related to the topic:
Marine A out in two weeks..
Marine A out in two weeks..
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 445
|
By:
the audio after him killing doesn't suggest any of that is true...............he knew he had done wrong.........he said it himself
|
|
By:
Did they hang an unarmed Saddam Huessian .
I think so, that was Iraq. We did the same in Britain, and America even today , unarmed ? |
|
By:
not so long ago in Britain they took unarmed people, and shot them by firing squad.
our own soldiers, that was during war certainly |
|
By:
British soldiers , unarmed , were shot by firing squad by their own British soldiers
|
|
By:
I'd be keen to learn if any of the feather duster cupcakes on this thread have ever served their country in the military? I doubt it.
|
|
By:
and all that was wrong................whats your point??
|
|
By:
It depends on the circumstances, until the 1960s the death penalty remained in Britain.
They took murderers and traitors and sentenced them to death, unarmed |
|
By:
You didn't have to commit murder, but be an accomplice to murder.
Then you found yourself sentenced to death, unarmed |
|
By:
It is impossible to know that a taliban might not blow himself up ,and everyone around him
That being the case , and until that changes, the onus is on them and the soldier should not be prosecuted . |
|
By:
Not that any of the snowflakes are ever likely to find themselves in the theatre of war, but I'd like to know what they would have done in a similar situation. Leave the Taliban there and risk being shot as they turned their backs? Call in the medics to a hotspot to stretcher the Taliban out, risking their lives in the process?
Let's not be squeamish, British soldiers are trained killers, so leave out this ridiculous moral outrage. Marine A should not have served a day in jail. |
|
By:
if........what the hell as Britain having the death penalty got to do with it........I suppose you have to talk nonsense because you are a moral thug
|
|
By:
"So we cut their c0cks off, put 'em in their mouths.... THEN we shot 'em" That story has been around since the days of the Indian Wars and Custer..... |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
It made me laugh that Studyform admitted to copying his own posts and saving them! Dear oh dear, the sense of self importance of these feathery cupcakes really is embarrassing.
 And as you say G2D that story he told is as old as the hills, is Studyform really that naive that he a) believed the story from his acquaintance? Or b) expects us to believe his own untruths? Pathetic. |
|
By:
You'd be a bit naive to let that old fable affect the rest of yer life.
|
|
By:
War is NOT Cricket in spite of what the government and judiciary tell us. If one comes across an opponent in a war situation where he has been trying, and will try again if he survives, to kill you, he should be dispatched with extreme prejudice to prevent this under any circumstances!
|
|
By:
so slicer.............SS executing british soldiers in france was justified iyo
|
|
By:
as you say war is not cricket.............anything goes iyo
|
|
By:
Totally different circumstances. Similarities cannot be drawn. The Brit soldiers did not have the potential to be carrying suicide bombs. I also heard somewhere that when our brave Brit soldiers had an enemy in their sights in Afghanistan, under certain circumstances they had to phone the commander for permission to fire.
|
|
By:
Daesh(it)do not follow the Geneva convention.
|
|
By:
why did the soldier mention the Geneva convention in the audio iyo
|
|
By:
slicer..............its lucky we don't wage war like the people on this thread would like us to do.............you have to have rules..................he broke them...............he admitted on the audio.............
|
|
By:
I don't care what the soldier mentioned. The fact is the "victim" was a potential threat. Let's say, on Waterloo Bridge in London, there is an incident. A subscriber to the Religion of Peace has driven over a few people and is wounded but not killed by a policeman. A member of your family has been sightseeing in London and is not too far from the incident. An armed policeman has the opportunity to dispatch the scum, but does not. The scum has a suicide vest that he detonates and the member of your family is killed. What would you have preferred. It's so very easy to have certain opinions when no one close is involved.
|
|
By:
Very well said Slicer, I tried to touch on something similar before but you have done it way better! Mind you still won't win against some of this lot
|
|
By:
Oh i don't know. They haven't won one yet...
|
|
By:
slicer............the man on the bridge had to be killed................this is different..........the reason we have war crimes is exactly for things like this............otherwise we are as morally corrupt as the enemy we are fighting...........don't understand how this is so hard to understand............you cant execute captured prisoners................in the words of slicer...............its not cricket
|
|
By:
Thank you Topshot. Frankly, I don't care what these people say. I have been warning about ALL of this for over 15 years and unfortunately it has all come true thanks to the human rightists, the " we can't stoop to their level types". Thankfully I have no family in the UK. Even some media that I used to respect now say we should hold hands and light candles instead of using the gun. Of course it's nothing to do with Islam, these people are all just murderous thugs (who also follow the religion of peace). In 20 years I won't be here, but your children, grandchildren may well be. And thanks to the lefties, terrorism will be almost an everyday occurrence. I say kill them until either they run out of terrorists, or realise that the UK police and army have retired from cricket and taken up war! After all, it IS war- according to subscribers to the religion of peace!
|
|
By:
I really think that some on this thread are borderline racist and some out and out racists
|
|
By:
Why is it different. He was a potential threat!
|
|
By:
I am not racist- I have best friends who are Hindus and Jews. The point is, they don't go about blowing up people and trying to convert the UK to Judaism or Hinduism. They get on with people minding their own business. It's just the one religion that gets on with no one else. The Islamic Republic of Britain is almost here. Newham and Tower Hamlets in London 48% Muslim and no go areas after dark for the indiginous population.Lets thank the Westminster murderer by allowing 2000 more of his potential kind into the UK.
|
|
By:
that's a classic I am not a racist........I have non white friends............well done slicer
|
|
By:
I am not telling you anything you didn't know..........but trust me you are a racist.......you show all the classic signs
|
|
By:
not hard to spot a racist.....
|
|
By:
Don't care what you think. I have helped my Jewish and Hindu friends in ways that you would not understand. And I certainly don't have to defend myself on a betting forum. But no hard feelings, because you are entitled to your opinion, a freedom that would be denied to you if the Religion of Peace comes to power.
|
|
By:
look I suspect this is not the first time someone has chucked the accusation of you being a racist......and judging by what you have written on here wont be the last.........NAP
|
|
By:
Not too bothered about being insulted by you calling me a racist. I never insult anyone on these forums.btw- you are repeating yourself. People repeat themselves when they are unable to add anything to the debate. So as far as I am concerned, my debate with you is over.
|
|
By:
Being anti Islam is not racist. HTH.
|
|
By:
not nice being called a racist.........is it??
|
|
By:
Thank you Torquemada. One never expects the Spanish Inquisition!
|