re:naydam  12 Oct 13 14:25   
I think "We've done nothing wrong" is meant to refer to the actual disappearance of the child rather than the events that led up to it.
I have no doubt that they have regretted those decisions ever since.

you think so?  remember the early days of the case when they were vilified for leaving the children alone and they actively, and arrogantly, defended themselves.  They strike me as a couple who have never questioned how right they are in everything they have ever done.

this is utter bollox now isnt it? e-fits of suspected people 6 years later

Comes across as a crimewatch "promotion" for more viewers

just read on bbc news the timeline has changed significantly,they went to eat at 8 30 and new sh,d been taken alegedly  by 10,00, how can that change, she could have been gone at 8 31 or 9 59,
people will still have reported sightings at say 6 00 or 11 30, seems a complete load of rollocks and everyone concerned because of the headlines could look rather foolish by 10 00 tomorrow night
they,ll hav had no calls this week but at least 40 to 50 saddo,s will ring in tomorrow night,if you no something ring now,put the efits up now,put these new timelines up now,its a complete joke

just read on bbc news the timeline has changed significantly,they went to eat at 8 30 and new sh,d been taken alegedly  by 10,00, how can that change, she could have been gone at 8 31 or 9 59,

That was always the story with Gerry checking on her at 9ish then another friend at 930 who said, rather strangely, that he didn't actually see whether Maddie was there or not.

i reckonto justify the appeal , the macaans will say they felt something strange as though they were been watched whilst gerry was playing tennis,
think the betfair detective agency cold case squad should be assembled in readiness for tomorrow nights show

one of the tapas 9 said she saw a man carrying a child away,maybe she,s remembered that she also saw him putting the towels on the sunbeds at 8.40 hence the german connection and the detectives eureka moment,

I will be interested to see what this new time line makes of

the infamous Jane Tanner statement.

Why did she say that she passed Gerry and his friend on that narrow street

at the same time she witnessed the so-called abductor (AKA Egg-man, Swarthy man, Victoria Beckham, Singing Detective.......).

When both Gerry and friend deny seeing her or abductor.

Someone is lying through their teeth here, surely.

just heard one of the producers,you still need a bit of luck

The photofit was constructed from evidence given by the Smith family ? So if you read the book by Amaral he claims the Smith family contacted  the police in Portugal  months later indicating it was Gerry they saw carrying the child in the street. How can any of this be reliable information...?

Is that Gerry in the e-fit picture?



An e-fit after 6 years? WALFB.

I'd struggle with an e-fit after 5 minutes.

I recon a 1000 phone up

ker ching

More o/t

Good luck to anyone who looks vaguely like the Madeline Mccaan efit today.

Gareth Barry & John deacon

better tread carefully today.

America not buying new theory

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sf4wVANuNRY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DSf4wVANuNRY

Two e-fits of one suspect seen by two witnesses. DCI Andy Redwood has made himself a laughingstock. #McCann #Crimewatch #BBC

Are the E-Fits the 'Eureka' moment the Met talked about?

According to some bisto loving cop this morning, the pics lookalike??

No wonder the Met is phucked..

theres a courtcase running in Portugal

why bbc showing now--smokescreen

maddies mother--apparently NOT taking the stand,written answers only

will e-fit be shown in Portugal where is happened

McCann twitter--majority sceptical/and police getting a roasting on e-fit pics