|
By:
Angel
I agree with most you say but i have personal experience of these inquest and i once gave evidence and the findings normally give more details and i have looked at the verdicts of other similar cases normally the verdit is more conclusive. We are only not getting the whole truth because thereis something to hide it is obvious Take your point because its not a murder no need to re open the inquest. |
|
By:
might have been better having 2 endings.
1) Tragic accident, through depression and constant abuse from the wife. 2) Was caught having sex with a talking Donkey, who survived a Tram crash. |
|
By:
2 Peter Barlow
|
|
By:
^
![]() |
|
By:
I wont be posting on this subject unless anything further substantial developments because the whole thing is just going round circle and I strongly have my beliefs about the whole thing which wont change.
Maybe we may meet again on other topics. |
|
By:
whole thing is just going round circle
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
daz500
You are sad - and most people on this forum would agree with that. Your arrogance is outstanding, only surpassed by your total insensitivity to the family of the deceased. You're not 'interested' you're grotesquely obsessed with something you know - and will never know - nothing about. Back off -get a life - and have some bloody respect. Btw I have never appeared on any blog - so you 're obviously confusing me with someone else. |
|
By:
I think Daz has low self esteem. Addictions and obsessions are born out of low self esteem. Many conspiracy theorists also, so i am not going to chastise Daz. He has a condition and needs to realise that he is not thinking rationally. He will no doubt disagree because he is in denial but one day he will self diagnose himself and completely agree with what i am saying. It will take time but it will happen. Good luck Daz.
|