We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 2876 comments are related to the topic:
9/11 was it a conspiracy?
9/11 was it a conspiracy?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2,876
|
By:
Akabula's post has disappeared?
|
|
By:
"defenders of the 767 theory want their cake and eat it too: supposedly powerful 767s easily penetrated steel walls and floors yet identically crumbled within a fraction of a second and vanished inside despite huge fuselage length and wingspan ¾ the length of a tower wall. Both 767s were never seen again from any side of either tower, a dazzling combination of imposing strength and fragility within a tenth of a second."
http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html |
|
By:
Pokermonster • July 26, 2015 11:19 PM BST
Akabula's post has disappeared? So it has. How is that possible? One of the other posters on here a mod or something? BTW everything I had in that post was facts. |
|
By:
Oops I got mixed up with my threads. What post were you referring to PM?
|
|
By:
The one at the top of this page, sir. It's reappeared now, but vanished for a few minutes on my screens.
|
|
By:
G1 all the suicide pilots had some sort of training. Was well documented.
I suppose as they hadn't been in control of the plane at take-off and had no intention of landing then a basic training would be sufficient. |
|
By:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmlBCqUaJ-c
|
|
By:
Girlschool, btw
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
egner • July 26, 2015 11:23 PM BST
"defenders of the 767 theory want their cake and eat it too: supposedly powerful 767s easily penetrated steel walls and floors yet identically crumbled within a fraction of a second and vanished inside despite huge fuselage length and wingspan ¾ the length of a tower wall. Both 767s were never seen again from any side of either tower, a dazzling combination of imposing strength and fragility within a tenth of a second." http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html |
|
By:
egner • December 24, 2013 12:05 AM GMT
..almost forgot about this...no akabula.. I am not happy.... ...the lovely round hole in the pentagon was explained...(im using explained in its loosest sense).....away by the fact the planes fuselage hit head on and made the nice round hole......(despite many claims by pilots that this would have been virtually impossible for even an experienced pilot)... ..but now you would also like the plane to have hit side on to explain away the question I asked..... ...why didn't the wings from the Boeing make any marks on the Pentagon?????? ...think its pretty difficult for the plane to both hit head on and side at the same time!!!!....yep. |
|
By:
egner • June 22, 2015 10:45 PM BST
..still no answer...nope........another question... ...and why would a terrorist....with the pentagon in his sights...decide not to hit directly.....but go round said pentagon(in a seemingly impossible manoeuvre for a plane of that type At that altitude) and skim the ground at at about 2 feet altititude in order to hit a certain section of the pentagon.....much like a guided missile. ..oops have I answered my own question.....Wink |
|
By:
egner • June 25, 2015 10:24 PM BST
..no further offers.....neo con conspiracy centred around the Bush/Bin laden (USA/Saudi) axis then...yep.....with various nefarious hangers on on...CIA?NSA facilitating.....yep. 28 pages.org |
|
By:
egner • June 25, 2015 10:53 PM BST
Congressman Thomas Massie...who has read the redacted 28 pages...(in secret of course).... .... described the 28 pages as “shocking” and said, “I had to stop every couple pages and…try to rearrange my understanding of history. It challenges you to rethink everything.” |
|
By:
egner • July 24, 2015 9:53 PM BST
....well...... ...there are 28 redacted pages.....and by all accounts they are very interesting....... ....if there is nothing of significance then what is the harm in making them public............??????? ......and why would a congressman make such remarks on reading them. |
|
By:
egner • July 26, 2015 9:16 PM BST
.....simple...reasonable questions that cannot be answered........ ....and yet when they are asked....the only reply is ......unpatriotic.......conspiracy theorist....fruit loop ...etc etc...... .....if the questions are reasonable and the official version has some depth of integrity...... ....then why is it so difficult to get simple answers to such basic questions. |
|
By:
egner • July 26, 2015 10:16 PM BST
...one thing is for sure.....the two towers were certainly not brought down by Boeing 767s....... ......and as for wtc7......well..all that really needs saying is that it came down in the same free fall fashion as the two towers..... ...yet nothing hit it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
By:
egner • July 26, 2015 11:23 PM BST
"defenders of the 767 theory want their cake and eat it too: supposedly powerful 767s easily penetrated steel walls and floors yet identically crumbled within a fraction of a second and vanished inside despite huge fuselage length and wingspan ¾ the length of a tower wall. Both 767s were never seen again from any side of either tower, a dazzling combination of imposing strength and fragility within a tenth of a second." http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html |
|
By:
Yes they fooled the world but not you.
 |
|
By:
...indeed akabula.....
..though however much I like you ...I must correct you..... ...they fooled a majority of the world........but not the independently minded ...ask quite reasonable questions .. minority of the world!! |
|
By:
"As if that isn’t enough, we have the resistance paradox. This phrase has been coined to describe the fact that not only did the towers fall at a speed, which indicates negligible resistance, but at the same time they ground themselves into fine dust while still standing.
This is impossible under the law of conservation of energy. If one were to postulate that somehow the entire building was—without any planning—miraculously and symmetrically disembodied, enabling it to fall without resistance, then it leaves nothing to explain the pulverization of the concrete. Such pulverization can only come from a high resistance collision. On the other hand, if you postulate extreme collision forces withinthe falling building, grinding the falling concrete into fine dust on its way down, then there is nothing to explain the resistance free fall of the speed. There can’t simultaneously be both high resistance—causing grinding of the concrete into dust—and negligible resistance allowing a fall at the same speed as through air. Only the input of extra energy—an orchestrated demolition, explains the simultaneous presence of both factors."[9] http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html |
|
By:
Pretty reasonable questions....pretty reasonable posts......
Yep. |
|
By:
As one who maintains that some form of controlled explosive must have demolished WTCs one, two and seven, I take exception to being labelled a fruitcake along with the fake aircraft or alien ray gun believers. Alas, of course, it was ever thus. The scientific integrity promised by President Obama in his inaugural speech, rather like those holographic passenger jets, never materialized.
|
|
By:
It was simply exactly what you saw even Bush who was in a School at the time was so flabbergasted he found it difficult
to believe and didn't know how to react to the news.If he knew it would happen he would have neverhave visited a School.. Simples when you use your brain....Don't believe the shoite... |
|
By:
No.
|
|
By:
Absolutely yes......
|
|
By:
Never been comfortable with the official story.
Where to start? So many bizarre and tragic events that day. With regard to the falling of the 3 towers I see no reason other than explosives for them to fall in on themselves. As someone who has felled a few trees, they will ALWAYS look for the easiest way to the ground. No matter how heavy the top may be, gravity dictates the top section will fall AWAY from that which is still standing. The explanation that a passenger aircraft hit the Pentagon borders on the hilarious if it wasn't so tragic. Where happened to the wings and why such a small hole? Geez, that pilot must have been one superstar flyer to put it down flat on that lawn... |
|
By:
"No matter how heavy the top may be, gravity dictates the top section will fall AWAY from that which is still standing."
There's just no arguing with this. Gravity isn't proportional to proportionate mass, force will be away-ish, if it's a tree. Meteors must have some sort of coefficient of tree-ness to affect the laws of physics and thus orbit. |
|
By:
To me it's like this ...
1) Opinions are like rsoles - everybody's got one. 2) So you have to seperate unqualified opinion from fact. 3) So ..if you want qualfied facts ..not opinions see what the experts are telling us. 4) See what Judy Wood has to say ...she has PHD doctorate in Structural Engineering 5) See what the "American Institute of Structural Engineers" say. |
|
By:
Of course it was a staged event.As Injera says,how would it be possible to get an approach of that angle to the Pentagon......Impossible.
|
|
By:
Simple answer to all this is....Do you believe EVERYTHING the media reports is true.if not which one/s.
|
|
By:
The Pentagon, more camera's on that building than any on earth, not one clear shot, and the one they do have of the approach to the building appears to have missing frames at the crucial moment whilst being far and grainy.
I feel sorry for people who call conspiracy theorists 'loopy', just tells me they don't quite have the balls to challenge governments official version. |
|
By:
Quite right Pinot Noir...
American Govenment totally corrupt ....just see what Edward Snowden has leaked. Nahhh they don't like the truth being out there ! American Media controlled by the Government and big business. |
|
By:
Pfft, conspiracy theories. Madness. I don't know if people realise, but there's still some weird people out there who believe that it was all organised by some bloke in a cave in Afghanistan.
|
|
By:
Niels Harrit Danish scientist along with Eight other leading scientists has confirmed use of Nano-Thermite on the World Trade Centre Twin Towers on 9/11/2001.
The dust from the World Trade Centre Disaster is full of remains of Nano Thermite Explosive. If your not an expert ...your opinion means nothing ! |
|
By:
Not really.
Depends who's funding the experts to have their expert opinion. |
|
By:
like those holographic passenger jets
Got to be the best yet and that's saying something given the level of stupidity on here.  |
|
By:
maybe the US were too embarrassed to admit that explosives had also been planted in the buildings in the weeks leading up to it. would have made them look like bigger clowns than they already were.
|
|
By:
There will always be a conspiracy if the facts are not released eom
|
|
By:
If your not an expert ...your opinion means nothing.
Published on 15 Feb 2015 Check out this best ever 9/11 technical analysis by architectural and engineering experts, pretty much proves 9/11 is a lie, even to died in the wool deniers. More experts ...how many more do you want ? An unqualified opinion is not worth Jack **** ! |