Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 2876 comments are related to the topic:
9/11 was it a conspiracy?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 68 of 72  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | ... | 72 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2,876
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 15:58
Here you dopey old sod.

- conscious and specific foreknowledge of the attacks, i.e., not merely forewarnings, coming from many different sources

- official surveillance of alleged hijackers well before 9/11, stories that cast doubt on their identities and motivations

- advance preparation for attack response

- advance prep of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

- inexplicable inaction by the air defense system and chain of command on the day

- wargames that coincidentally mirrored the 9/11 scenario

- obstruction of field investigations prior to 9/11;

- after-the-fact: destruction of evidence, silencing of whistleblowers, promotion of people who "failed," lack of accountability, conflicting official stories, obstruction of justice, delaying and limiting investigations, obvious omissions and cover-ups, culminating in the truly farcical conflicts-of-interest and absurd dissemblings of the Kean Commission.
By:
mobo
When: 30 Sep 13 15:59
It was a conspiracy yes.  Do you not realise it was a video!!???
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 15:59
- conscious and specific foreknowledge of the attacks, i.e., not merely forewarnings, coming from many different sources

- official surveillance of alleged hijackers well before 9/11, stories that cast doubt on their identities and motivations

- advance preparation for attack response

- advance prep of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

- inexplicable inaction by the air defense system and chain of command on the day

- wargames that coincidentally mirrored the 9/11 scenario

- obstruction of field investigations prior to 9/11;

- after-the-fact: destruction of evidence, silencing of whistleblowers, promotion of people who "failed," lack of accountability, conflicting official stories, obstruction of justice, delaying and limiting investigations, obvious omissions and cover-ups, culminating in the truly farcical conflicts-of-interest and absurd dissemblings of the Kean Commission.
By:
akabula
When: 30 Sep 13 16:04
All info taken from the net as gospel.
All info discredited elsewhere on the net.
Blush
By:
egner
When: 30 Sep 13 16:04
...just let through AG.....

Cheney and his "project for the new American century" came to the conclusion that in order to avoid waiting decades to reorder the middle east and to gain more proxy states and influence that a catalysing event such a new "pearl harbour" would be needed....and hey presto...that's what they got.
By:
Dobbo
When: 30 Sep 13 16:19
I'm dopey? I ask a question and you answer a different one.I'm not sure if you are dense or daft. Forget it. You obviously do not have a clue what you think happened,
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 16:25
Which bit don`t you understand Dobbo?
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 16:26
- conscious and specific foreknowledge of the attacks, i.e., not merely forewarnings, coming from many different sources

- official surveillance of alleged hijackers well before 9/11, stories that cast doubt on their identities and motivations

- advance preparation for attack response

- advance prep of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

- inexplicable inaction by the air defense system and chain of command on the day

- wargames that coincidentally mirrored the 9/11 scenario

- obstruction of field investigations prior to 9/11;

- after-the-fact: destruction of evidence, silencing of whistleblowers, promotion of people who "failed," lack of accountability, conflicting official stories, obstruction of justice, delaying and limiting investigations, obvious omissions and cover-ups, culminating in the truly farcical conflicts-of-interest and absurd dissemblings of the Kean Commission.
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Sep 13 16:28
AG you are not really making any sense, would you mind if you stopped your diverse ramblings?
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 16:32
The off side rule makes no sense to my great aunt Jackie lfc...somtimes if you don`t understand something it can be confusing LFC.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 16:34
Lfc lets start with the top one.

conscious and specific foreknowledge of the attacks, i.e., not merely forewarnings, coming from many different sources

Why do you feel this is rambling?
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Sep 13 16:37
OK continue if you must, but please a simple explanation of what you think happened....

its very confusing although i don`t doubt the US must be to blame, that seems the easiest solution.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 16:41
Already posted this lfc.

They let it happen, fully aware of the plan. Confused air defence communication to avoid shooting down the airlines and planted military explosives in WTC 7.



That`s my theory.
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Sep 13 16:47
Hmmmm okeydokey.
By:
Dobbo
When: 30 Sep 13 16:59
Oh dear.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 17:01
Dopey Dobbo has a theory as well but he is rather shy.Sad
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Sep 13 17:01
Dobbo don`t be so rude! He might be kidding us...AGs like that
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 30 Sep 13 17:04
Thanks lfc...you watch my back, i`ll watch yours
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Sep 13 17:04
Happy
By:
David Fishwick Minibus Sales
When: 30 Sep 13 17:07
.
By:
David Fishwick Minibus Sales
When: 30 Sep 13 17:07
.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 30 Sep 13 20:34
In hindsight with a view to politeness and respectiveness i would like to retract comments which could be construed as discriminatory towards any older peeps  we have on this thread .

i am in no way ageist  and would like to apologise to all posters over 41.75 who may have been offendedLaugh


whilst concluding  investigations and collecting data  into the correct  sound of a passenger jet flying at 300m at a speed in excess of 500mph (this could take some time) i will leave you with these short vids .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbNszu6zbe4

"critical logical thinking" Wink



here is another educated man letting his quest for the truth  come through with good  honest speak ....and this was 2005 Shocked

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8 



i have love  the elderly ....respect Love
By:
polybot
When: 03 Oct 13 08:19
- conscious and specific foreknowledge of the attacks, i.e., not merely forewarnings, coming from many different sources
- official surveillance of alleged hijackers well before 9/11, stories that cast doubt on their identities and motivations
- advance preparation for attack response
- advance prep of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq
- inexplicable inaction by the air defense system and chain of command on the day
- wargames that coincidentally mirrored the 9/11 scenario
- obstruction of field investigations prior to 9/11;
- after-the-fact: destruction of evidence, silencing of whistleblowers, promotion of people who "failed," lack of accountability, conflicting official stories, obstruction of justice, delaying and limiting investigations, obvious omissions and cover-ups, culminating in the truly farcical conflicts-of-interest and absurd dissemblings of the Kean Commission.


AG, setting aside the admin's proven lies, let's assume your above conjecture as evidence, and for say, the Tsarnaev attacks as one example.
You'd uphold the death penalty for Barack here?
By:
polybot
When: 03 Oct 13 08:19
"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
By:
egner
When: 03 Oct 13 15:44
by that measure the whole Bush administration should in the clink...yepWink.
By:
Torquemada
When: 03 Oct 13 15:48
Depends how you define a conspiracy.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 03 Oct 13 16:54
there is only one question which may be easy to answer...maybe i missed it.

the suicide pilots....were they actually trained to fly jumbos??
there has to be a major difference in flying a small plane for training than say a big jumbo so what was the story here?

how did they learn if indeed it was them?
By:
polybot
When: 04 Oct 13 12:41
Well AG, egner supports the sentencing of Barack, and Holder, and Clinton, and Rice, and Clapper, and the rest.
What say you, guilty?
By:
very-valuable
When: 05 Oct 13 17:02
Contrary to popular opinion, flying an airliner into a sky scraper is a very hard thing to do and should not be attempted by some one that has taken a few flying lessons in a cessna
By:
tobermory
When: 07 Nov 13 23:01
Blush
By:
egner
When: 07 Nov 13 23:05
imo...yes...it is.
By:
egner
When: 07 Nov 13 23:07
...why didn't the wings from the Boeing make any marks on the Pentagon??????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmP2Vy8K0i0
By:
AyersRock
When: 09 Nov 13 09:09
we should keep all this on one thread tbh
By:
egner
When: 09 Nov 13 15:05
sorry ayers.. thats my fault....forgot about his thread.BlushBlush

I will post on here from now on.
By:
egner
When: 09 Nov 13 15:06
and will repeat this to see if anyone has a rationale explanation....

...why didn't the wings from the Boeing make any marks on the Pentagon??????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmP2Vy8K0i0
By:
breadnbutter
When: 10 Nov 13 00:40
Here is some new angles and a mixture of different people who are working hard and gathering evidence trying to put it into some sort of a  coherent and presentable form .This whole story is just beginning and slowly but surely a fuller picture is emerging ,whether you believe in planes or not they are really just a distraction as to what caused the buildings to disintegrate in pyroclastic  clouds .
The people who are so quick to try and put down anyone who offers an opinion that differs from the absurd and bizarre official explanation are themselves an enigma that need exploring and understood .Meantime have a watch of this ,its a lot to get through and may take a few sittings Wink but its well worth a watch and plenty of logical observations that have so far little explanation .Much of what is talked about on 9/11 is conjecture but this film offers some angles not yet fully expanded .
As the evidence mounts a picture is building ,bit by bit that picture is getting bigger but more questions than answers is still the main theme .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dslF-hh90lg
By:
egner
When: 15 Nov 13 22:15
..good stuff breadnbutter..

and...

...why didn't the wings from the Boeing make any marks on the Pentagon??????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmP2Vy8K0i0
By:
akabula
When: 15 Nov 13 22:17
It hit the building side on. Mystery solved. Happy now?
By:
AyersRock
When: 08 Dec 13 18:11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4mRTcqpi98
By:
egner
When: 08 Dec 13 18:18
brilliant..id forgotten about this....

and no akabula..I am not happy..

I will post why laterWinkLaugh
Page 68 of 72  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | ... | 72 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com