Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 492 comments are related to the topic:
roulette machines in bookies

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 9 of 13  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 13 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 492
By:
Ratbag
When: 05 Feb 09 18:33
There are still some casino managers that will panic when a dealer is "stuck in a section" but the rest of us laugh heartily at this witchraft.

In fact I used to work with a guy who salted the floor behind a winning punter for luck.
By:
wild ting eyes shut
When: 05 Feb 09 20:25
Ratbag, I'm new to this thread and obviously feel strongly about the issue, I've looked through your posts and you talk alot of sense. I was a victim in my youth, in my opinion education is the only cure, there are alot of people in need on here. Respect to you and your efforts to convert.
By:
MarkEitzel
When: 05 Feb 09 22:33
Nothing gets more up my nose than sanctimonious t**ts who thing they are so superior and think that it is necessary to explain that you only get 35/1 on a 36/1 shot on a roulette table. Ive played roulette in casinos for 25 years and yes I have lost overall. However it has given me some of the best nights of my life. Now you clever people may be from the tiny percentage of people who actually earn a living gambling. I doubt it though. You just like to give the impression of superiority.

To win at gambling you must have an edge. Either work or have a reliable contact in a racing yard, have quick pictures and back in running, or have some amazing bot. I have none of those and in my view roulette gives value for a "pinsticker" as you are getting 35/1 about a 36/1 shot. If your luck is in you will win. Now how many times have you studied the form for a race, picked out what you thought was a great value bet and your horse run below form and finish tailed off. You may have got what you consider a good price but in fact your horse had no chance that day. That situation does not exist in roulette.

I accept that roulette is not a game for a compulsive gambler, but then what form of gambling is.

My problem with FOBTs (which I do not play) is that they do not seem to allow the chance to have a good luck streak and win thousands. I have seen people bet £150 per spin hundreds of times on FOBTs. At that level if your luck was in you would win big. It always seems that the run of luck that these players get is bad. As I have mentioned before I could tell hundreds of stories of nights in a casino where i have seen and even experienced myself a run of amazing good luck on a roulette table. I have never seen such a run on FOBTs. Its interesting that although this thread is months old now, no one has told a story of amazing luck on a FOBT.

I have no idea how the machines work or whether they are truely random. All I know is I would never play them, as I do not consider that you are getting 35/1 about a 36/1 shot. Your odds of winning are much less than that
By:
Nova Sicko
When: 06 Feb 09 00:38
seen a guy get to over 17k in a shop before they reduced the amounts you can stake. Think they started with 200, ended up cashing 16k.

The shops where the limit was 10k credit I saw a few times.

Worst loss on a single day by one player was over 12-13k
By:
wild ting eyes shut
When: 06 Feb 09 02:06
Mark,

Not only are you damned rude, you are making a fool of yourself with your constant utterings. If you took the time to try and understand what people told you you'd stfu and bury your head in the sand. Hope that doesn't sound patronising. I do not have to explain my source of income to you so take the chip off your shoulder and keep it in your pocket. I feel I have something to contribute as I do understand how these things work and there is a lot of confusion, not least from yourself. I put alot of effort into my post with the intention of helping people who are having problems and you choose to berate me. You talk such nonsense in your post I really not sure whether to bother addressing your points atall.

Its all about turnover. Things happen so fast you forget you just had five winning spins in two minutes you just press repeat and return to losing again. Bit different to five spins in 20 minutes at a casino, all winning, different kind of buzz. As Ratbag mentioned to you earlier, its about your perception. The numbers are the same.

Limits stop the punter from getting too lucky, reducing exposure. With £100 a spin, £500 max win, it would be very dificult to win an amazing sum. If someone was winning £20k the fraud squad would probably be on their way to check the machine. The maths could be worked out precisely regarding deviations and without a bit of research I get a bit lost there right now. It would also depend on the players strategy. If he spreads *****all over the board bar a couple of numbers and sits there all morning feeding, he is never going to win diddly squat, however high his stakes, turnover will deal with him.
By:
MarkEitzel
When: 06 Feb 09 12:03
Difficult to win a large sum??

If you win £500 on six spins on the trot thats £3000 less stakes, so probably a profit of £2000 from six spins, on a FOBT that would take about two minutes.

I am aware of the limitations of roulette, my whole point is that you do not see many lucky people on FOBTs. I do not know why this is, but you do see far luckier people in Casinos.
By:
Pots11
When: 06 Feb 09 12:04
Wide - I'm sure you have read some books or attended one or two classes on probability but I'm not sure you know anything about roulette, either machines or live.

Wins of 10k plus on machines fours years ago were quite common and didn't result in the fraud squad being called in. When people are having £100 on a number it doesn't take long to be winning those sorts of sums. The problem was these stakes were far in excess of those that provincial casinos would allow and that those casinos needed a completely different licence to offer such games. They started to 'create' with the gaming board and end result was that stakes were reduced to something more in line with a bookmaking rather than a gaming licence.

I didn't say dealers can nominate sections, what I did say is that they can can get stuck in a section. When their release of the ball is almost constant (spead and direction), the starting place for release is fixed by the last spin, the speed the wheel spins at is almost constant and the affects of gravity are constant then the results will not be entirely random.

Also you cannot achieve a random distribution of cards with a ripple shuffle. Only a true table shuffle can do that. I'm not sure what point you were trying to make about turning over the top card in a deck. Just because I don't know what the card is it before hand doesn't mean the result is random. If I place a deck of cards in order and you give them one ripple shuffle I will happily take 50/1 that I can name the next card out having seen the top card. I don't know what that next card will be but I know the result isn't going to be totally random. Simply because your input to the process (the shuffle) isn't sufficient to randomise the result. In the same way that one dealer, one speed of release, gravity, almost constant wheel spin aren't enough to guarantee a random outcome. I don't know on what number the ball is going to land but I know it isn't going to be completely random. How you profit from that knowledge is another matter but given that it isn't random you can.

I'm also unclear on what you mean by the "spin the random". We are betting on the outcome of the event and debating whether that outcome is random. I say that is isn't as the inputs can be used to calculate, with some degree of accuracy the outcome. As a rebut to that you offer some nonsense that that the spin is random whilst accepting that the outcome can be calculated and therefore isn't necessarily random. Have I summarised your position correctly, if so these are my last utterances on the matter.
By:
Ratbag
When: 06 Feb 09 16:16
Pots, for your information, it's a riffle shuffle, not a ripple, and the "table" shuffle is called a chemmy shuffle, I think after chmein-de-fer (very old card game).

To all intents and purposes, a dealer can't get "stuck in a section" due to minute variations in spin and cone speed and so on - the proof of this is as simple as the fact that no one has ever ripped a casino off in this way, and if it were possible, it would have been done.

The sophisticated computers used in, for example, the Ritz scam work by minimising the variables, and come into effect once the ball has been spinning for a few revolutions, which removes the two variables I mention above - by then spin speed and cone speed can be assessed. I, along with any number of casino people you care to name, have met plenty of dealers who reckon they can section spin (effectively the same as being stuck in a section) and none can do it under test conditions.

I'm convinced the relative lack of winers on FOBTs comared to casinos is due to a combination of limits, spin speed and type of customer that plays them ie one who is more likely to play to extinction than cash out.
By:
Ratbag
When: 06 Feb 09 16:17
That should have read "Chemin-de-fer".
By:
Ratbag
When: 06 Feb 09 16:17
And "winners" not "winers" ... although ...
By:
wild ting eyes shut
When: 06 Feb 09 18:35
Mark, Are you just baiting or something. In your quote you substitute [i]
By:
Pots11
When: 06 Feb 09 18:37
Thank you for identifying the names of those shuffles. Hence forth I will be sure not to call it a ripple shuffle in polite society.

I don't see getting stuck in a section as a betting scam or even an intentional act. Most dealers I know aren't even thinking about spinning the ball or where it will land half the time. They are simply day dreaming or chatting whilst they are spinning.

My interest in this discussion is simply around the fact that I don't believe that a roulette wheel is a random number generator in the way that a lottery draw machine or a table shuffle is.
By:
Pots11
When: 06 Feb 09 18:41
To use some proper technology to try and predict the number would not be fair, it does not mean the number is not random.

Yes it does.

Going to the casino now - night.
By:
wild ting eyes shut
When: 06 Feb 09 18:47
aarrggghhhhh! good luck.
By:
Ratbag
When: 07 Feb 09 10:10
The point I was making was that if it possibe to get "stuck in a section" then it could be taken advantage of - it never has, so I reckon it's not possible.

The argument about whether a spin is random or not has, I think, two answers. If you measure from halfway through the spin, it is somehat predictable, if you measure pre-spin, it can be predicted so is in practical terms random.
By:
REDROB
When: 17 Feb 09 18:28
Surely the answer is in the name. FIXED odds betting terminals.
By:
No Chatname Specified
When: 18 Feb 09 09:16
Ummm ... no ...
By:
westmead owner
When: 18 Feb 09 12:46
lost 180 in machine yesterday dont no why went in this morning put a tenner in the smae machine won 480 in seven spins the machines are rotters and shouldnt be allowed in the bookies
By:
Bilkodog
When: 18 Feb 09 13:19
It's 1.25 you'll be back in there tomorrow though? Hope not mate. I've learnt my lesson on those blasted things (hopefully) and I stay away from them - haven't touch one in nearlly 2 years. Must have lost an absolute mint on them though! I still see guys queuing up to get into the local bookies at 10 am every morning to get their ** on the FOBT. Terribly sad and I hope they are outlawed soon.
By:
dodadae
When: 27 Feb 09 13:43
I second those thoughts about "outlawing" - but doubt whether this govt could ever push thru such a move.

I wish I could have the willpower to stay off them for two months - let alone 2 years - it is my opinion that these machines hot "losing" runs much faster than one would experience over a period of time betting in the same manner on a real table; no proof obviously, just personal (& other's) experiences.

I'm surprised that machines are still as "popular" - as I can't believe anyone really honestly believes they can win on them regularly -

who knows? It's all a mystery to me!!! As others have said, maybe it is simply down to "addiction". And a bit of Nanny-state intervention would be much appreciated for the growing number of addicts there are to these machines (figures from Gamcare, GA etc).

Anyway - just another observation - betting shops today - I pop in every now and then (prob about 6 times a month) whereas in the past, I averaged about 4 days a week and hours at a time - we all know about the introduction of virtual racing - all well and good - last time I was heavily into betting shops, they had just introduced the 2nd virtual meeting of the day, and then it was virtual dogs!! - Now - we have virtual speedway - all well and good - a bit of "variety" - but there I was the other evening (prob about 6pm) and they had a virtual horse race go off - and the commentator got into it!! - and then midway thru the race, they went split screen to show the virtual sppedway and then the commentary switched!!!

When did they got to the point of having so much virtual stuff that it was on split screen!!!!

Anyway - rant over.
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Mar 09 11:10
LOL SPLIT SCREEN FOR THE CARTOONS ,I LIKE IT :)
By:
cherrypicker
When: 11 Mar 09 21:02
HI GUYS I HAVE READ EVERY FOBT POST & MY CONCLUSION IS THAT WHEN THESE THINGS WERE 1ST BOUGHT OUT THEY LET PEOPLE STREAK I USED TO GO INTO MY LOCAL LADDIES AND SEE PEOPLE WITH £500 - £1000 IN THE BANK QUITE OFTEN.
I HAVE LOST THOUSANDS MYSELF THEY ARE A**!!
CAN ANY OF YOU GUYS PLEASE TELL ME THE LAST TIME ONE OF YOU HAD THAT AMOUNT IN THE FOBT BANK OR WHEN YOU HAVE LOOKED AT ANOTHER PUNTER WITH A DECENT BANK????

THE OTHER THING I HAVE NOTICED IS THAT PEOPLE SEEM TO BE WINNING ON THE GAMES LIKE REEL KING I WONDER HOW LONG BEFORE THE SOFTWARE WILL BE CHANGED LIKE ON THE OLD ROULETTE SOFTWARE

I HAVE HAD A DECENT RUN IN THE PAST FORCING THE ZERO
BUT ALSO NEEDS A BIT OF BOTTLE TO GET THE LITTLE GREEN ******* TO DROP IN.
By:
Charlie Bronze
When: 11 Mar 09 22:56
In my local T0te shop last week, noticed a guy robotically stick to the same bet: £9 each on numbers 1, 2 & 3; £7 on each of the splits. He hit 1 and 2 (but never number 3) enough times in half an hour to cash over £2000. All very matter of fact. Didn't seem too pleased with himself. Have seen someone else use a similar strategy(?) before, and it was successful then too. Requires nerve, a bankroll and luck though. Would he have quit and walked away £500+ down if he didn't hit his numbers within 10 - 15 spins?

This thread has provided plenty of food for thought, not all of it digestible. There's plenty of half-baked claims, counter claims and superstition. These infernal machines are part of the gambling culture now so why is there no definitive information anywhere on them? I would have thought there had been enough cautionary tales of addicts damaging relationships, losing homes, suffering depression, etc, to warrant consumer groups/watchdogs to fully investigate and publish some findings.
By:
you_never_know
When: 12 Mar 09 00:06
Looking on the web, there is alot of theories of 'seeding', a pre-designed set of numbers (probably 15 black/red) to encourage people to bet and that's why (apparently) the programmers can make money on them.

I'm not saying this is right, just what is on the web.
By:
supersavo
When: 13 Mar 09 16:44
The mugs who feed the fobts will have to be extra careful after the cheltenham results.. the high st bookies are bound to turn down the % on them to make up for losses on the horses
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 14 Mar 09 11:31
taken from the thread about Joke Orals on general betting


Schluck, du Luder! 14 Mar 11:04

was speaking to my old man this morning and he says he's given the hard sell about these ghastly machines every time he goes in to put on his £1 accas and lucky 15's. Now he wouldnt be able to work one of these in a million years, but the friendly lad behind the counter would be only too happy to show him. I bet on "unpopular" stuff at the Jokers and have never been asked once. Seems certain people are being targeted by these less than scrupulous "bookies"
By:
woolythetipster
When: 19 Mar 09 22:33
how do i go about buying a FBOT?
By:
stockey
When: 24 Mar 09 10:49
thread of the decade B-)
By:
soixanteneuf
When: 26 Mar 09 15:13
the only consistent thing i have found where there is a slight flaw is the next number theory...if a 10 drops in or any other number for that matter bet one above and one below for next spin...ie 10 so then 9 and 11 next...it is not an exact science but it does happen in sequence quite a lot.....also you must have a lot of wedge in the pocket but i like to put 10 pound on red, 10 pound on black, 10 pound on zero, you are losing 10 pound a spin but you dont go 36 spins without it dropping in on zero very often, and it certainly drops in more than twice in 60 spins, so a profit is frequently made, you have to be able to walk when it drops in ...what most gamblers fail to notice is a 70 profit in an hour is better than what most men are working for !!! keep the discipline and good luck ...DISCIPLINE IS THE RULE ON ALL GAMBLING START LOOKING AT PROFIT IN RELATION TO THE AVERAGE HOURLY WAGE !!
By:
easykc1
When: 26 Mar 09 20:42
i think you need to see a doctor pal..10 pounds on red /black and zero?..why not just 10 on zero? maybe its the maths that your not good at?
By:
The Red Rafalution
When: 27 Mar 09 00:30
.................... but i like to put 10 pound on red, 10 pound on black, 10 pound on zero, you are losing 10 pound a spin but you dont go 36 spins without it dropping in on zero very often, and it certainly drops in more than twice in 60 spins,..............

:^0 what a d1ck
By:
The Red Rafalution
When: 27 Mar 09 00:32
soixanteneuf 26 Mar 15:13 ^^^^^^^^^^

BTW
By:
DIMIS IREGULAR BOWEL MOVEMENTS
When: 27 Mar 09 01:15
lol. reading some of the posts on this thread is like banging my head off a brick wall for hours upon end. jesus wept
By:
kohaku
When: 27 Mar 09 10:14
10 pound on red, 10 pound on black, 10 pound on zero, you are losing 10 pound a spin but you dont go 36 spins without it dropping in on zero .

lol.............first laugh ive had for days..
By:
soixanteneuf
When: 27 Mar 09 10:16
i think you will find it is more to do with buggering up the mechanism of the machine...tried it have you !!! ..nah thought not well dont knock it til you have tried it ...dick head !!
By:
soixanteneuf
When: 27 Mar 09 10:22
some might argue anyone who is sad enough to sit on here at that time rafa red is a dick head....but just the fact you are scouse must mean unemployed and loser !!
By:
kohaku
When: 27 Mar 09 11:02
So you get your money back on Reds and Blacks.and LOSE £20 on red and black when the 0 comes up.

lol.
By:
soixanteneuf
When: 27 Mar 09 15:10
the machine goes haywire when this rule is applied and personally i dont mind losing 20 pound on the red and black when i have just won £360 for it dropping in on nought ! anyway laugh all you like mate, it aint you winning bundles of dough doing it ..its me ! ..

you must forget about the losing 10 pound a spin, it is placed on red , black and 0 to throw the system...when it drops on 2 x 0`s within 72 spins you will have made a healthy profit !..it generally does it by the 42nd spin as a rule...result = lost £420 , won =£720

if you think you can earn 300 notes in an hour elsewhere fill your boots son !!
By:
parispike
When: 27 Mar 09 18:42
Got to be fishing, got to be.
By:
Bilkodog
When: 27 Mar 09 18:54
I certainly wouldn't mock anyone who thinks he may or may not have found a way to make on these machines. Of course we all know that 10 pounds on black and 10 pounds on red on a real roulette table in a real casino would be totally pointless.

But the guy is not suggesting a real casino is he? He's suggesting using this system on a machine in the hope of 'throwing' the machine out of sequence. Personally I don't think it would work long term. The programmers will have looked at all angles and if the machine is paying out 300 pounds regularly on zeros you can garauntee some mechanism will kick in whereby zeros just don't come in. No way are these machines randon IMO.

Don't get me wrong though - you might get a few good days in a row and win a good few hundred on this system. All it takes though is for zero not to fall in for 100 or 150 spins for you to give back any profit, with interest. 100 or 150 spins are nothing on the grand scale of things and there are probly several numbers on the wheel that don't come in during a sequence of this length, just as there are other numbers that might come in 10 tens or more in 150 spins.

I don't play these machines anymore but I'd be interested if anyone else has tried this same system over a decent period and how they got on?
Page 9 of 13  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 13 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com