Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 24158 comments are related to the topic:
Spam/OT Thread 2

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 64 of 604  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | ... | 604 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 24,158
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:03
majority of UKIP-ers think parliaments most important decisions should be made by referendum Love

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7_6J6pX0AEGoiq.jpg:large
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:04
I'm somewhat sure Scotland and the other 2 countries currently being oppressed would be reasonably satisfied with that.
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:04
Theresa May will be seen as responsible if the UK loses Scotland and NI
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:04
The thing is though Aaron, I think people will ignore that Cameron brought up the referendum, especially as he campaigned for remain.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:05
Cameron took a great tactical gamble offering a referendum I think.
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:05
And May could easily oversee a load of bad stuff. You've just listed one, she will be blamed for these. Normally someone becomes synonymous with these failures and I think it will be May.
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:05
pandering to Kippers and the loony Tories not a good thing for me Tongue Out
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:05
that's Cameron btw, though has carried on
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:07
May's biggest blunders are that she's given in to the hardliners, despite herself and the majority of people probably preferring a softer approach, and that she's brought up hilariously stupid ideas like converting the UK into an offshore tax haven.
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:07
Like if you take what I said about Chamberlain, and obv I'm always needling using his name, but if you were in his position in 1936 what was he actually meant to do. He had a public and a cabinet that strongly wanted to avoid war, his cabinet was like all behind appeasement. In fact that cabinet thought we should make peace with Hitler when offered it in 1940.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:07
I just think the number bods sat round a table and said. Labour are looking likely to get in. Offer a referendum and we might get enough voters to squeak a minority and stay in power but statistically it's impossible we will swing it to get a majority and therefore have to enact a referendum.

Tactical genius just the impossible happened and they got a majority.
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:07
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8CPJZZX0AIoEY7.jpg:large

love that the media can't just say we are leaving the EU and we can all play nice and get along
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:08
number bods should have realised the polls always overstate the left and they were looking good anyway Tongue Out
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:09
Oh, I love chalk coastal mountains Love
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:09
If it hadn't been for Chamblerlain himself specifically recommending Churchill as PM, we likely would have ended up with a PM who would have taken peace with Germany. As the actual candidates who would have been in running were all in favour of doing so.

I think I said before Churchill could never get in power under ordinary circumstances, everybody hated him in Lords/Commons etc. So this was actually genius from Chamblerlain, yet no-one ever gives him any credit for this historically.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:09
or whatever you call them in English
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:09
Churchill was hated by like all the old guard in Conservative party too.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:10
Peace between Germany and the UK would've been nice
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:10
Would have been bad for future of the world and future democracy though.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:10
We would've left you alone, promise
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:11
Well yer you would have for a long time at least, only because in reality you couldn't really attack us anyway.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:12
All we really wanted was to create some room out east and some nice atlantic coast holiday areas in what used to be France
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:12
oh really
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:12
I still think Germany would have lost if that happened, though the war likely would have gone on for a long, long time, much longer than it did.

And it was far from certain then too. And both outcomes then were hardly desirable were they. A Europe controlled by Nazi Germany. Or a Europe controlled by Stalin.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:12
Germany would have won the war had they not been so desperate to attack the East for it's oil and steel resources.
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:12
Like Germany would have actually been finished in the later scenario. As like the Iron Curtain would have been at least far West as borders with France if not even further west than that.
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:13
They had to attack the East for those resources though as Germany didn't have them.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:13
Don't have any ressources now either and we're the greatest country on the planet
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:13
As like the Iron Curtain would have been at least far West as borders with France if not even further west than that.

that sounds not good
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:13
I'm sure they could have made a pact with the East, they were on good terms.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:13
Japan = no ressources and 2nd most awesome country around
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:14
We did have a pact with Stalin on Poland, just betrayed it
By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:14
Germany could have won under those conditions anyway. I still think you likely would have lost though. Partly because as said before Hitler was a mug on top of being evil. He would have made some blunders somewhere.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:14
Adolf didn't want to do deals and couldn't resist.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:15
Communism was Hitler's 2nd big enemy behind jews
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:15
Like he did on d day when he refused to send panzers and other tanks further west as he refused to believe the landings were significant and genuine and just a dummy for further east.
By:
aaronh
When: 28 Mar 17 23:15

Mar 28, 2017 -- 5:15PM, edy wrote:


Communism was Hitler's 2nd big enemy behind jews


but alt-righters on Twitter say the Nazis were left wing

By:
n88uk
When: 28 Mar 17 23:15
They especially would have won if you combined an attack in the west on Russia with attack in the east in Russia from Japan, then I definitely think Germany would have won.

But Japan had no interest in that, as it didn't help them (needed resources and all the resources in Russia are western Russia, also East Russia very easy to defend with mountainous terrain etc.).
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 28 Mar 17 23:15
Exactly edy, but you could have made a pact for resources and future reperations and later betrayed those.
By:
edy
When: 28 Mar 17 23:17
nazi Germany did have a pact with Stalin as I said, just chose to betray it, take Stalin by surprise (from what I know) and attack them nonetheless
Page 64 of 604  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | ... | 604 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com