|
By:
1.2s, not as low as I thought.
|
|
By:
SorA ,did you back kohl at 40-A?
|
|
By:
no I backed him when he was a set up.
|
|
By:
**** u kohlschriber
|
|
By:
I backed Kohl at 1.9ish and laid Andujar at 1.25 now
|
|
By:
sounds sensible enough.
|
|
By:
this muppet is toast
|
|
By:
now looking decidedly foolish
|
|
By:
its one break of serve. On clay.
|
|
By:
Superted was my hero when I was a kid, couldn't help taking his post as gospel
![]() |
|
By:
great point. had another lay on at 1.15
|
|
By:
Should be interesting to see if Andujar can serve it out easily.
|
|
By:
Too many players involved in betting.
|
|
By:
pressure's on
|
|
By:
Tempted to bet on Janowicz too v Anderson.
|
|
By:
what a point that was!
|
|
By:
k
|
|
By:
monster point there. I thought JJ was good but not touching it
|
|
By:
you have to apply binomial distribution with probability to win a single point for game odds, and similar wiht probability of winning a set for match odds, hth
|
|
By:
Double fault!
|
|
By:
what an idiot
|
|
By:
yes
|
|
By:
The line judge behind Kohlschreiber has extraordinarily long legs!
|
|
By:
double fault!
|
|
By:
what an idiot!
|
|
By:
it's 30-30. this is why 30-30 is a worse position to be in than 0-0
|
|
By:
Merda!
|
|
By:
you were saying?
|
|
By:
Andujar has to be imploding right now
|
|
By:
surely this is a Kohl win now?
|
|
By:
what im saying is that 30-30 is worse than 0-0 lol.
|
|
By:
that game gave no evidence of it.
|
|
By:
ofcourse, kohlschreibber wasn't under any pressure was he
![]() |
|
By:
Janowicz is still tempting.
|
|
By:
he is better on clay than Anderson, but of course, Anderson has form coming into this.
|
|
By:
yes, the last match gave no evidence of it
|
|
By:
the last match gave full evidence of it*
|
|
By:
at 5-4 Andujar was at 1.9s wasnt he?
Why, at 6-5 is he at 1.7s? Explain that. Because he has guaranteed at least a tiebreak? Why should that affect the odds? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
because he can break and win
|