|
By:
couldnt be arsed to read all that but:
a) murray won't beat ferrer b)murray might not beat gasquet hth |
|
By:
I agree with Morgan... specially for the non-reading, for the Ferrer and for the Gasquet parts...
![]() |
|
By:
gasquet is covered and the profit on him is 33000£ too. if murray looses gasquet advances and then bet heavily against gasquet when he faces ferrer :)
|
|
By:
no chance for mugray
Gasgay will beat him Ferrer will beat him Rafa, Nole and Fed will beat him give up you crazy british people |
|
By:
sifron please check the odds Murray is favourite against gasquet but GASQUET IS ALSO COVERERED AND PROFIT ON HIM IS ALSO 33000£. and mind u sifon Nole and fed cant beat him because they are not in murrays part of the draw. Either Nole or fed will be eliminated before the finals. There is a realistic chance for murray to make it to the semis.
|
|
By:
Murrey the dark IDIOT and MUG...mate the Scot is simply a loser
|
|
By:
vector my advise is to green as soon as simple.... if your bank is that great there many more ways to make 1.00 pounds easier and faster tham that.... Good Luck
|
|
By:
You do make incorrect assumptions vector, not sure what's your intention here. But you can't say Andy will be favourite in a matchup with Ferrer because he won't, plus you're assuming some set odds there doubtful as well.
|
|
By:
better off investing in the ladies winner market. only case murray can win if the top 3 pulls out. As long as one of them is in it, he has close to 0 chance of winning french open, he has better chances in us open and aus open, but bottled in the finals.
|
|
By:
better off investing in bernie madoff or the solar powered torch
|
|
By:
as mogan says cudnt b arsed reading it either. and ferrer will destroy murray IF he beats gasgay
|
|
By:
Murray will not make the semi. Even if he was 100% fit, he just can't play on clay.
|
|
By:
Murray is always a dark horse and he will never win a slam.
|
|
By:
Agreed Crowseye,although a fine player and the best we have produced in decades cant see him ever getting it done on the big occasion and with fine young players coming through his chances have probably came and gone,still no need for the disrepect to Andy by some on this forum in general and this thread in particular.
|
|
By:
well guys as it proved Murray hammered gasquet. If Murray performs to his best Gasquet is no match for him. Ferrer will loose to him too. and the odds will drop as low as 20 odds
|
|
By:
then will be the time to back rafa all out
|
|
By:
ok guys 33K profit as a buffer. going to use some of it against Ferrer. I can freely bet on David ferrer to win 3-1 atleast a 1000K. and alsoon 3-2, because ferrer cant beat him 3-0 thats out of question. If ferrer wins i get atleast 4000k, if he looses Murray is in semis and his odds in the market will drop to 20s as i said. then with 33k buffer lay him against nadal and also bet heavily in favour of nadal. I wish some of you would have taken me seriously and not been arrogant about murrays reaslistic chances for the semis.
|
|
By:
Just to make it clear to some of the stupid comments Nole and federer will play each other if they reach the semis so they will not face murray. I never said Murray will reach finals he will probably make it to the semis and with a 33k profit margin buffer you can safely bet against murray when he faces ferrer or nadal. Because that way u will feel safe even if by chance murray happens to beat ferrer u still have that 33k and odds market would have dropped to 20 from 50 or 60.
|
|
By:
even if i cash out now im green :) but i like murrays chances against ferrer but going to spend 500£ on ferrer 3-1 and 3-2 win just in case. if ferrer wins i win more than 1000k liability on winners market its not a loss
|
|
By:
this 33k only allows me to safely bet on ferrer with out fear that he might loose, get ur thinking caps on.
|
|
By:
Vector...
what if ferrer wins 3-0 ?? and thats totally possible ... and what do you mean '1000K' ? and '4000K'? these sums you refer to are 1 million and 4 million , Im not sure about ur figures vector , ur reasoning sound feasible , but Im not sure you've expressed it very clearly , good luck though |
|
By:
Murray has done well so but you're deluded if you think he will drop to 20 if he beats Ferrer. Nadal started the tournament odds on for a reason and is going to take most the market at 1.36 - 1.4 at the semi stage.
|
|
By:
so far
|
|
By:
listen yomomma i never said murray will beat nadal for the starters. but can you safely bet 4000k on nadal winning with out even a slightest fear of loosing ????? unless you know you have backing of 33k.
|
|
By:
I think he'll be about 30 if he beats Ferrer. It's all good as long as you can make some profit though.
|
|
By:
in sports anything can happen. I remember Nadal getting knocked out by Ljubicic in french open and consequently federer won that french open. Similarly chelsea won the champions league.
|
|
By:
the idea behind taking murray at 50 was just to act as a buffer. So you can bet freely on nadal or ferrer to make some profit and cover the liability of 1000k
|
|
By:
30 for some one in slam semis is too high. preferably 25-30 but you may be right still better than being 50.
|
|
By:
Nadal's only lost to Soderling when he had an injury. He's a shoe in to win it again. It's going to be 8 appearances and 7 wins, nobody playing well enough to trouble him.
|
|
By:
sorry yes my wrong it was soderling
|
|
By:
i got confused between soderling and ljubicic
|
|
By:
Djokovic backers must be seething he's gone he wrong way, from 4.3 to 5.5
|
|
By:
but its not 100% nadal will win. most of us will not bet 5000£ on nadal to win just because of a slight fear that murray can upset him and murray can on a given day. only way to bet heavily on nadal is when u have the comfort that even if he losses u have 29k still for the finals to play with.
|
|
By:
i gather its wrong to take djocker or roger at 5 and 14 as one of them will not make it.
|
|
By:
but world no 4 at 50 thats a good one only to trade at semis
|
|
By:
some people if they were lucky when murray was about to pull out when he did that injury act could have had taken him at 400. :( i didnt
|
|
By:
to much of a risk to back djocker at only 4. because he can loose to tsonga on a given day and then he faces federer in the semis. The easiest rout to semis was for murray. betting on tsonga and delpo also not a great idea as they have federer and djocker in the way
|
|
By:
Good luck with it. Match with Ferrer will probably be a close one.
|