|
By:
willydog 08 Jul 22:46
Sb was saying 6-3 5-0 for Isner and he touched the 1,23 THe odds are going up with each post. I only saw the SB when he was 4-0 then 5-0 up and he was sub 1.08 then. I didn't watch it so I don't know what the odds were but it's untrue to say everyone was piling on at these odds. And I repeat, how are those laying at 1.23, in the knowledge (or even just suspecting) that the scores are the wrong way round, any better? If anything that is even worse. |
|
By:
http://www.ibas-uk.com/adjudicationForm.php
|
|
By:
try to use the word "f.i.x" writting the word normal, the system don't post!!! try it....
|
|
By:
spyretto 09 Jul 00:47
We may determine, at our discretion, to take steps to block you from placing bets via the Exchange if you are located in certain jurisdictions. For example, it is Betfair's longstanding and continued policy not to allow bets from people located in the United States of America and we have put restrictions in place to attempt to prevent you from placing bets via the Exchange if you are located in the United States of America. Excelent point..! |
|
By:
dawsy 08 Jul 23:49
amorphous shut the **** up you idiot i bet you layed isner No need for that. He's right |
|
By:
works fine, spir
fix |
|
By:
There was a bizarre moment towards end of first set/start of 2nd, where Isners odds just went mental and hit 2.5.
|
|
By:
I don't wanna imply this one was a davydenko, though
|
|
By:
its night, dont think that the betfair bosses are very happy with this situation, will not wonder if a void is going to come tomorow
|
|
By:
i wonder if anyone was actually implicit in having the names the wrong way around in order to make money
no doubt that would be impossible to prove anyway! |
|
By:
the word F..I..X not work for me....the system return the "You have posted to a moderated forum. Your message will be reviewed shortly and published." !!!!!!
|
|
By:
nonfixedgamesaregood 08 Jul 21:53 surely now should be 1.01 at 4-0 ..... bigjonh 08 Jul 21:53 1.08lol leefee 08 Jul 21:53 yup....should be 1.01 colourwizard 08 Jul 21:53 1.07 at a set and 4 0 up :^0 dionio 08 Jul 21:53 haha still odds available at 4-0 lol UMAGA 08 Jul 21:53 It be hilarious if this scoreboard was fake bigjonh 08 Jul 21:53 its got2 be the bot 111111111111 08 Jul 21:53 someone is giving money away leefee 08 Jul 21:53 hey guys....could you imagine if the odds went like this in everymatch tomorrow? ;) lol Johnymac 08 Jul 21:54 Do you believe levine has broke Isner So many times ? No me neither the scoreboard will be right Martin Gale III 08 Jul 21:54 lol at whoever programmed himself this "bot" - some serious self-foot shooting :D leefee 08 Jul 21:54 still 1.05.... realhalford 08 Jul 21:54 1.05 free money for everyone ... colourwizard 08 Jul 21:54 its definitely the betfair bot putting up cash Monkfish 08 Jul 21:54 hahaha excellent stuff LOL MUGS "THEY KNEW" |
|
By:
i dont know how they knew....and it doesnt make a difference to me......like the people who tought thet knew that Isner was serving for the match didnt care when they just took the most that they could...if Isner actaully did won should this people come and complain that they just layed Isner because the source from they were getting the scores was wrong and so it should be void?
people use whatever they can to be "in the know"...their sources were right,sb wasnt...simple as that |
|
By:
at best its incompetence from whoever setup the scoreboard and at worst fraud
|
|
By:
dawsy...I lost a serious percentage of my bank tonight. I'm not particularly pleased about it!
but no point in blaming other people or looking for a conspiracy, no point in moaning. we were all stupid, all greedy and quite frankly deserved what we got. learn from it, next time we both might be lucky enough to get on the right side next time it happens! |
|
By:
OSZUCI!!
|
|
By:
GRANTED WE WERE GREEDY BUT BETFAIR NEED TO LOOK AT THEIR LIVESCORE SERVICE.
|
|
By:
Again, SURELY, if Isner was injured, like we had suspected, then he would have been the one on the end of a 5-0 tanking?
What I didn't understand was that surely Levine must have been injured according to the scoreboard, because of the ease of how Isner was winning the games. But when you think about it, and swap the players, it made perfect sense |
|
By:
moderated forum i cant see my post and thought i was making a xalid point
|
|
By:
anybody beginning to see the funny side yet???
thought not :) |
|
By:
I'VE LOST A LOT MORE BEFORE THAN THIS :)
|
|
By:
I think it`s hilarious.
|
|
By:
bwin has voided the match :O
|
|
By:
all we have lost before this, but not like this. And as you can see I'M from 2004 here, my friend. Today won, but I fell that I took ( stolen ) my mate"w money..that's all..This is not the game...
|
|
By:
Exacly Umaga. If you switch the odds then it's clear there was no dodgy betting, just a borked scoreboard and one or two lucky courtsiders.
|
|
By:
dawsy 08 Jul 21:59
bwin has voided the match :O really? |
|
By:
thats what someone told me in their chat
probs lying i dont know!! |
|
By:
Monkfish, my contempt for the losers here stems from the fact that (some of them at least) whacked a large % of their betting bank on this match. To commit more than a few % of you betting bank is crazy enough but to stick nearly your whole bank on with only a scoreboard to go by is idiocy.
As I said before, BF has done these guys a favour because they have no chance of winning long-term anyway and now they have more time to see the sun and the real world... |
|
By:
At least, would it be imaginable, somebody hacked the official SB ? How can we ask for a minimum of investigation to verify this point ?
Another point is right after the match BF settled it with Isner as winner, proof that BF uses the same official source than we all here. So how can they use it for themselves as an accurate source of info, and on the other hand refer to their policy to exclude it at same time as an accurate source of info when it comes to such a situation ? |
|
By:
who won?
|
|
By:
bwind could say technical odds mistake, but here i got f u c k e d up by a couple of insiders who knew the correct score and mugged up the odds
|
|
By:
wonder how long before they pull this thread.
might want to save now people. |
|
By:
dawsy 08 Jul 22:59
bwin has voided the match :O Why? Because they have morals, unlike Betunfair - we really should leave this monopolised company... |
|
By:
Why on earth should anyone void this match?
|
|
By:
the word bwin and morals cant be in the same sentence ;)
|
|
By:
as RAPS points out, it was incredibly foolish to bet large on this match.
no such thing as free money! I consider tonight a valuable part of my trading education, and i'm sure in the long term it was probably a good thing. |
|
By:
wont deposit anymore if they don't void.. it is simple like that
if they void davy match, they have to do it again.. both matches are unfair.. yes dont have prove of protennislive operator or someone do it but We dont have prove davy match fi.x.ed either.. it is the same.. if all of losers put themself was stolen like davy matches.. something was wrong and betfair need to fi.xed this See you tomarrow with good news! |
|
By:
because everything went wrong? 10000 people lost a lot of money and 25 people won a lot, just crazy
|
|
By:
The "courtsiders" if they are indeed in the USA aren`t home and dried either BTW.
BF tries to crack down on people using proxy servers and successfully stopped a few Aussies betting on Australian rules in-play at the start of this season. If (and it`s only speculation) people were in the USA betting on this BF might have the last laugh here by not paying them out. |
|
By:
still not void, hurry up betfair!
|