Of course it is but magnify that at least 50 fold.

You really haven't answered my question except with another question, is Trump right castigating Israel for indiscriminate bombing?

Yes I think he's right to say that, and there should be consequences.

The real terrorists are Iran. They have been funding it for years.

Sunny but quite cool today in W Yorks, hysteria from the usual suspects has died down somewhat.

nice

Who is the guardian reader, lol

Qed 500+

denier  /dɪˈnʌɪə/

A person who questions the current religious orthodoxy in power;
An evil apostate to be opposed.

Nowt , but it will go Down at Some time  regardless

It does seem surprising that the very progressive leftie greens are quite happy to allow multi billion companies like SSE renewables to build wind farm cities that will kill tens of thousands of animals each year and destroy the local ecology to make millions for their shareholders whilst not being able to articulate why this will bring down the global temperature.

And all because the feckless councils wouldn't clear the scrub. This is why you should never vote for the left.

An almighty internet clatter lapsy ?

"there are currently 2 people viewing this thread ". Not so much a clatter more of a muffle

Awww bless

79% of the worlds population follow a Net Zero policy

That's a lot of Commies..

I never knew I was a commie. You learn something new every day.

The bear of little brain trolling again i see

Lapsy, the met office regularly get the forecast for the next day wrong in our region, not sure they can predict it for a day 30 years hence

A lot of past predictions for the future have been somewhat awry, if they hadn't catastrophised erroneously so much in days gone by then maybe people would take more notice. Remember in the 70s some were even predicting a new ice age (even The Guardian went with that).   The trouble is that the media often present worse case scenarios as actual fact, it's a bit like the boy crying wolf if you like. One day the scenario will actually play out, but because so often before it hasn't transpired then people won't be taking notice. The undernoted seems a balanced take imo

The 2020s: Moving Goalposts and the Cost of Alarmism
Now in the 2020s, climate deadlines have continued to shift. The ice-free Arctic is now predicted for mid-century. Glaciers are expected to survive decades longer than originally forecast. Activists still frame action in terms of “last chances” and “points of no return,” but the specific timelines are increasingly viewed with suspicion.

Meanwhile, the underlying science continues to show steady trends. Temperatures are rising. Seas are creeping upward. Glaciers are shrinking. But the apocalypse, as sold by politicians and activists, remains elusive.

This matters for two reasons. First, exaggeration undermines real science. Every failed prophecy provides ammunition to sceptics and makes it harder to rally public support for legitimate policies. Second, it distracts from the actual challenges, which are gradual, complex, and long-term. Climate change is not an asteroid strike. It is a slow-moving, cumulative problem. Addressing it requires honesty, not hype.

BOLB - haven't a clue what you are on about, care to elaborate instead of your usual trolling ?

How about answering the question instead of that meaningless reply ?

What thread are you on about that you have falsely accused me of getting deleted ?

Escapee14 Aug 26 19:01Joined: 27 Aug 04 |

Nottingham this October?



The Goose Fair will be the main attraction, actually starts 25th September but continues through the first week of October. Enjoy if you are going