Climate Change Deniers running for their Tin Foil Hats

Qed x 3

panic over 18 C here sun in the Sky lovely Breeze . Going back to 76 I can remember that extremely hot period lasting Weeks ,Stand pipes were in use etc 

We have just had a bit of Hot weather for a few days , But Donnie and the BBC types want us to believe the world is in Grave danger of Catching fire 

Most people have other things to be concerned about

Probably a lookalike as well saddo

But certainly as one dimensional and lacking in new material as has been Hislop displays on a weekly basis.

A common event that tinfoil hat wearing climate change deniers latch on to
and use as a benchmark is the UK summer of 1976.

In climate terms, UK summer of '76 was a localised blip, 1976 doesn't even register as an
unusual year in global terms.


This 30 second NASA video shows the average global temperature every month since 1880 to 2026, the visualisation in the last 5 seconds will have the tinfoil hat wearers reaching
for some super glue to keep their hats on.



https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/1ugq80x/the_nasa_climate_spiral_visualization/

I haven't read all the thread, could you kindly paste comments
from anyone denying climate change and I'll read them, thanks.

But Donnie and the BBC types want us to believe the world is in Grave danger of Catching fire


Qed x 4

That's a poor example of someone denying climate change, and the world really
isn't going to set on fire, is it? Any better ones?

Tack it onto your weather report for today if you like.

Qed x 5 and 6

Really struggling to see how that comment is "denying" climate change, but that's the lefties mindset, try and twist others words any way they can to suit their agenda.
Donny no doubt finds himself hysterically funny, continually posting "qed" , at least it's a step up on his usual "lol". What an intellectual titan . 

Semel cunnus, semper cunnus 

Escapee will continue to not answer any questions actually asked, but just drone on regardless as though he's been asked a different question.

Neither of them has come up with a denial line, perhaps there really are none.
I'll wait for the weather report anyway.

Qed 6 and 7

Heat not reflecting off the tin foil today and cooking
their tiny braind

7 and 8 even

Difficult to keep up with their output

That tin foil gag is sooooo funny 

Qed x 9

Mis-spelling brain when taking the plss is a little unfortunate though .
Qed is getting ultra boring, quick, bring out the kool-aid gag.

Chump is a denier, calls climate change a hoax.


Have you ever known a magaloon to not believe absolutely everything chumps says?

There are plenty of magaloons on here, ergo there are plenty of climate change deniers on here.


The epstein files are a hoax.
Climate change is a hoax.
The cost of tinfoil hats has doubled because of biden inflation.

Ah, so it's actually a TDS thread, that explains things.

Qed x 10d

Qed x 11d

Trump says that Israel bombing Lebanon is wrong because too many innocent people are dying.

In Escapee's addled brain because Trump is a "denier", that means anonymous posters on a betting forum in the UK must be as well, even though they have said nothing of the sort. Simply calling out some of the alarmist reporting of the past few days as OTT and relating our own lived experience does not make us "deniers".

Qed x 12

As we see how the tin foil causes the straw men to
be formed by the idiots, who've been transfixed on
the thread unable to gain any traction for their already
Clear denial

qed - tick
tin foil - tick
denial - tick
straw men - tick

BINGO !

change the record ffs

Those of us old enough to remember '76 will know that the great hoax of the time was 'global cooling'. When that lie was exposed, the hoax became 'a hole in the ozone layer'. Again, once we weren't all aerosoled to death by next week, the hoax was changed to 'global warming'. Seeing as we didn't all frazzle up, they've recently had to resort to the latest catch-all phrase, 'climate change'!
Chortle at their ineptness and illogicality!

Tim's a fully paid up climate change denier and proud of it.

Trump calling climate change a hoax gave him a "nocturnal emission"

Qed x 13

Never forget, all good and right-thinking people, that the Latin for 'left' is 'sinister'. No coincidence, fairly obvious and self-explanatory, eh comrades? You lefties know what you are. And so do we.

The sinister left is in full view. It's a dark plot which can't be hidden.

Do you agree with Trump stating that Israel has lost the run of itself and killing a load of innocents RON ?

]Never forget, all good and right-thinking people, that the Latin for 'left' is 'sinister'. No coincidence, fairly obvious and self-explanatory, eh comrades? You lefties know what you are. And so do we.

Left is Latin for sinister!?!?

No, it was a bunch of people 2,000 years ago claiming left handed people were sinister, and possessed by evil.

Stands to reason that a magaloon would not only believe these snake oil salesmen, but take take it to the next level and claim it as a fundamental truth that all things "leftist", like the NHS, pensions, minimum wage are evil.



Never forget my harris, you don't even know what you're supposed not to forget.

lovely week ahead Few showers Tuesday , Handy ,long may it Continue , plenty of Greenery and Flowers Blooming Bees getting busy  ...

Isn't it true lapsy that Hamas killed innocents on october 7th?

Of course it is but magnify that at least 50 fold.

You really haven't answered my question except with another question, is Trump right castigating Israel for indiscriminate bombing?

Your other choices are Trump is wrong or you prefer not to answer.

Yes I think he's right to say that, and there should be consequences.

Indeed, war crimes and genocide falls into what i consider organised terrorism.

The real terrorists are Iran. They have been funding it for years.

Margate was was over the weekend seems the heat got the better of some folks

Sunny but quite cool today in W Yorks, hysteria from the usual suspects has died down somewhat.

Lovely down the south coast , no FILTH either

nice

France records 2,025 excess deaths at peak of heatwave as Europe braces for more extreme weather

Even The Guardian says that 1000 of those were attributable to heat,
but 2000 looks so much more dramatic. He's a habitual Guardian reader

Who is the guardian reader, lol

Qed 500+

it's called Global climate change for a reason

South Korean authorities are deploying drones to issue heat warnings to farmers while residents are taking shelter in airports, as the country battles an unprecedented heatwave.

President Lee Jae Myung has ordered public agencies to mobilise all available resources to deal with the extreme heat, which he has called a "national disaster".

Temperatures in the south soared to a record 42.5C (108.5F) earlier this week.


"Heatwave conditions once seen only in foreign news reports have now become our reality," Lee said on Thursday.

denier  /dɪˈnʌɪə/

A person who questions the current religious orthodoxy in power;
An evil apostate to be opposed.

If we spaff another £2 or 3 Trillion on net zero how much will the temperature go down by?

Nowt , but it will go Down at Some time  regardless

it's irrelevant what the weather/temp actually does


it will always be as hot/cold/dangerous/stormy as they say it is


remember to blindly trust gov/institutions/corporate only


they really are our only source of truth from hereon

It does seem surprising that the very progressive leftie greens are quite happy to allow multi billion companies like SSE renewables to build wind farm cities that will kill tens of thousands of animals each year and destroy the local ecology to make millions for their shareholders whilst not being able to articulate why this will bring down the global temperature.

Sad to see the amount of wildfires in the Midlands this evening. The country is a tinderbox with no rain in places for almost 2 months.

And all because the feckless councils wouldn't clear the scrub. This is why you should never vote for the left.

The councils involved are Conservative and Reform

You certainly live up to your name

7.26pm, that's what you call an almighty internet clatter!

An almighty internet clatter lapsy ?

"there are currently 2 people viewing this thread ". Not so much a clatter more of a muffle

Conservatives are lefties as far as I am concerned. They brought in lockdowns and furlough pay. Spin that commies!!!!

Awww bless

They love net zero too, all communist policies.

79% of the worlds population follow a Net Zero policy

That's a lot of Commies..

Met Office did a weather map for 23rd of June 2056(easily googled), we know that is a bit fair out for an accurate forecast however it had 45 deg high for that day and their scientists project that.

I never knew I was a commie. You learn something new every day.

Must be by the minute for you.

The bear of little brain trolling again i see

Lapsy, the met office regularly get the forecast for the next day wrong in our region, not sure they can predict it for a day 30 years hence

A lot of past predictions for the future have been somewhat awry, if they hadn't catastrophised erroneously so much in days gone by then maybe people would take more notice. Remember in the 70s some were even predicting a new ice age (even The Guardian went with that).   The trouble is that the media often present worse case scenarios as actual fact, it's a bit like the boy crying wolf if you like. One day the scenario will actually play out, but because so often before it hasn't transpired then people won't be taking notice. The undernoted seems a balanced take imo

The 2020s: Moving Goalposts and the Cost of Alarmism
Now in the 2020s, climate deadlines have continued to shift. The ice-free Arctic is now predicted for mid-century. Glaciers are expected to survive decades longer than originally forecast. Activists still frame action in terms of “last chances” and “points of no return,” but the specific timelines are increasingly viewed with suspicion.

Meanwhile, the underlying science continues to show steady trends. Temperatures are rising. Seas are creeping upward. Glaciers are shrinking. But the apocalypse, as sold by politicians and activists, remains elusive.

This matters for two reasons. First, exaggeration undermines real science. Every failed prophecy provides ammunition to sceptics and makes it harder to rally public support for legitimate policies. Second, it distracts from the actual challenges, which are gradual, complex, and long-term. Climate change is not an asteroid strike. It is a slow-moving, cumulative problem. Addressing it requires honesty, not hype.

I see you had the thread deleted Dixie where you outed yourself..

Wise move..

BOLB - haven't a clue what you are on about, care to elaborate instead of your usual trolling ?

I've only posted on 2 threads, hardly trolling,

How about answering the question instead of that meaningless reply ?

What thread are you on about that you have falsely accused me of getting deleted ?

2 derailments on the hottest ever day recorded in the UK of 38.1 Degrees (100.38F in old money)

Climate Change = Derailed Trains.

After the heatwave comes the the floods, 1 month of rain in 1 hour in japan yesterday.
Nottingham this October?

Escapee14 Aug 26 19:01Joined: 27 Aug 04 |

Nottingham this October?



The Goose Fair will be the main attraction, actually starts 25th September but continues through the first week of October. Enjoy if you are going

Hottest ever day???!!

38 degrees??!!!

Wot a loon, keep believing the rubbish and lies.

Was that the temperature recorded in Kew Gardens where are the glass, conservatory’s and greenhouses are?

Or maybe the Heathrow tarmac???

Hi Benny, I noticed a post of yours the other day, it was about DEI and you went off on a tangent mentioning DEI's link to astrology, I didn't understand.

What brand of (Is "brand"? the right word ) Astrology do you follow?

Do you have a full time afterlife consultant?

there will come a time, unfortunately, when even hard core deniers will have to accept the reality

its getting worse folks and denial aint going to stop it

but they will more likely just stop talking about it as they do when other conspiracy nonsense is exposed

what should be said louder is that everything we do is a drop in the ocean and worthless while others like china and india pay lip-service but dont do much at all

Aug 14, 2026 -- 10:04PM, BennyBinion1 wrote:

Hottest ever day???!!38 degrees??!!!Wot a loon, keep believing the rubbish and lies.Was that the temperature recorded in Kew Gardens where are the glass, conservatory’s and greenhouses are?Or maybe the Heathrow tarmac???

I think there should be a VAR for yesterdays 38c at Kew (and any at Heathrow)...overtaking the 38c set in Norfolk by 0.1c ... i hate the London stations with a passion always sticking their nose in ...there are around 8 in total in a smallish area of greater London ,yet  only 4 in Suffolk,and 4 in Essex  which is a massive area and often is hotter than London in summer .   It was 35-37 in plenty of places outside London yesterday  .

Where are all these hardcore deniers? I have never once read or heard anyone saying climate change isn't happening.

^ One lad says 'they love net zero too,all communist policies.' Isn't that lad some hardcore denier who thinks any effort at attempting to lower greenhouses gases is in fact a communist?

Net zero is communism, how is that denying climate change is happening? It requires Soviet-style central planning where the state—rather than consumer demand—decides what is produced and consumed. We have to accept crappy electric cars that burst into flames and trap people inside.

I see the bear of little brain has scurried away without providing proof of his accusation against me.
Maybe he's gone in to early hibernation

As for his claim that "79% of the worlds population follow a net zero policy" - how is that remotely provable ?
It's true that many countries have agreed to follow net zero aims or pledged to do so, but they could be doing next to nowt at the moment and anyway it's those countries governments that have signed up, doesn't mean the actual population has.

Net zero never going to happen totally unrealistic for certain industries. Was possibly a stupid two word Policy, Should everybody be working towards reducing emissions, of course I don’t think anybody disagrees with that but timescales too short, and I take the argument on tough objectives within the plan, but they need to be realistic.

Climate is changing. Throughout the billions, millions of years of the Earths existence this has been the case. It's cyclical. We're in the beginnining of a rise in temeperatures. It'll probably finish mankind although it may not. Do I believe in man made climate change? No, not at all. Do I believe in climate change per se? Course I do. It's obvious, but it doesn't matter what efforts mankind undertake to change/alter the cycle.... it wont work. It's cyclical and been happening for eons. It's the planet Earth.

Ronaldmcdonald 15 Aug 26 11:37

Where are all these hardcore deniers?

Here's one

TheGoldenVision 15 Aug 26 21:51

...Do I believe in man made climate change? No, not at all....

The thread title says 'climate change deniers', find one.

The first sentence of GV's post Escapee was Climate is changing. That doesn't sound much like climate change denial to me. Are you feeling alright?

These climate zealots are like chest thumping gorillas, shouting for someone to challenge them.
I don't think they realise how ridiculous they are.

It's like a religion for them. Everything is so black and white and can't have any degree of nuance to it.

Even people who start a post with "the climate is changing" are hardcore climate change deniers according to nuts like Escapee. He can't even read the full post and process it. It's just he is a Denier.

Back in the 14,15,1600's when "Denier" came into use, it was used to describe those who believed in logic, reason & science, instead of defering to a fairy tale book club's view of reality.


Now it's the opposite, A denier is someone who believes in a cult or a book club over logic, reason & science.


How turn tables over time.

You are the one just calling people a "hardcore denier" Escapee even though they said they believe in climate change. I was referring to your use of the word calling people a denier even though he has literally said "climate is changing".

Comprehension is not Escapee's strong point Shrewd. And that's being kind.

Deliberate misrepresentation of other's views may be an alternative take for those less charitable than myself.

He has undoubtedly become more unhinged in recent times and is now the forum's number one attention seeker.

Wrong again, denier was in fact Escapee the name of a French silver coin in the 1400s.

utter bollox all round

there are some who say its a hoax. cant say much for them. they are also likely to be moon-landing deniers or jfk loons also

but those who accept theres a change but hedge by saying its been going on for millions and is not anthropogenic are worse, because they are superficially reasonable

the sheer number of studies from very serious scientists not prone to hyperbole or wild speculation, combined with conclusive evidence from every part of the planet and every scientific institution, every university, every govt. including the bad ones like russia and china, the volume of is simply overwhelming. its unprecendented which is why its hard to say with absolute certainty but its 1.01

i have a stack of new scientist magazines that are stuffed with info about this and will send them to anyone who is interested (nobody)

why are all these boffins so united in determination to fool the whole planet with this monstrous idea?

and at such great cost, contrary to what the mugs will tell you

it would be nice if those who say its not what is claimed put up any evidence to support their anti-theory

If a climate scientist were to say publicly now that I have studied this, it's nothing like the emergency the alarmists say it is, and we don't need any of these net zero type remedies, do you think they would still have a job and a pension given the trillions of vested interests involved? At this stage I don't see how it's even possible for the science to be followed independent of the money.

the sheer number of studies from very serious scientists not prone to hyperbole or wild speculation, combined with conclusive evidence from every part of the planet and every scientific institution, every university, every govt. including the bad ones like russia and china, the volume of is simply overwhelming. its unprecendented which is why its hard to say with absolute certainty but its 1.01

i have a stack of new scientist magazines that are stuffed with info about this and will send them to anyone who is interested (nobody)

why are all these boffins so united in determination to fool the whole planet with this monstrous idea?

............................................. 

As with covid, any scientist with a differing view will be deplatformed,or out of work. If there is only one opinion published
there is no conversation to be had, so we have none. You regard yourself as an expert because you read the only information out there.
I'll be kind and regard you as a bit naive rather than stupid.

It seems to me that science is not capable of backing off from net zero even if science indicated that's what we should do because of the huge paydays expected with net zero. Science should be able to change direction with new information and climate science can't because it's a religion, or a cult.

We are no better off for science than Galileo was in the 1600s. He found evidence the earth revolved around the sun and the catholics showed him the instruments of torture, and he recanted. Galileo had to kneel and formally renounce his own findings, and that's not science, just like today with climate science.

There are scientists out there with differing views, but they'll never be on the MSN.

An interesting and balanced take imo :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl__O_QGIR4




Everything you think you know about Climate Change vs. The Truth

Several years ago all BBC employees, including one known to me, were sent a directive which said that
man made climate change was a given. That made it impossible for any scientist with an opposing view
to ever be on the BBC. If only one opinion was allowed in the Oxford union society there would be no debates.

I don't think it would be wrong to say climate change is a given because it is changing, but climate alarmism, and net zero communism as the solution shouldn't be a given, that would be anti-scientific. David Bellamy challenged it and never got any work again from the BBC.