Those who vote democratic are more prone to to using voter fraud ( like labour in U.K.)
So that is why they can’t be trusted with mail or electronic voting

Simple as that

You have to watch them as they vote , watch them closely

someone once said never trust anyone who votes democrat ( or labour )
don’t trust anyone , not even your own mother or father

Good advise

You would imagine that because Trump is in the process of wrecking the democratic process in America, there will be multiple court cases in many states to try and decide the "winner". Perhaps throwing minimum "hail mary" bets around isn't a bad idea.

The faux concern for the sanctity of mail in voting by Trump voters is embarrassing anyway when their man is enthusiastically killing the post system

Vote-by-mail delivers an array of problems
Lanhee J. Chen Opinion contributor
Published 11:46 AM EDT Apr 8, 2020

A broad expansion of vote-by-mail or early voting systems because of the coronavirus crisis raises logistical concerns, as well as worries that voter fraud or other election security issues will taint the electoral results.

Election administration is decentralized in the United States, so different states and localities are at very different levels of preparedness for a transition to vote-by-mail systems.

While citizens in some states, like Oregon, are used to voting in all of their elections by mail, about half of the states do not have vote-by-mail as either an available or widely available option. In those states where vote-by-mail is widely used, infrastructure likely already exists to mail out printed ballots, ensure their safe return, and then process voted ballots in an efficient and secure manner.

For example, Oregon has been an all-mail state for presidential general elections since 2000, giving it 20 years to work out the kinks. But it’s unlikely that states with no or limited vote-by-mail history would be able to effectively stand up the necessary procedures and facilities before the November general election. Furthermore, a 2005 bipartisan electoral reform commission concluded that vote-by-mail programs create “concerns about privacy, as citizens voting from home may come under pressure to vote for certain candidates” and, perhaps more significantly, increase the “risk of fraud.”

OUR VIEW: Wisconsin voting mess sends a message for November

If election administrators are unable to verify the authenticity of votes cast, election results would be delayed or put in doubt, and protracted post-election legal disputes are likely.

There is also little evidence that vote-by-mail significantly expands turnout in federal elections. And all-mail systems face equity concerns because it can be a challenge to get ballots to voters without addresses, or who move often. Increasing access to early voting also raises concerns.

Voters who cast their ballots early risk missing critical information that can surface in the closing days of an electoral campaign. Such programs do not appear to increase voter participation meaningfully. And a vast expansion of such programs raises logistical and cost concerns similar to those created by the move to increase voting by mail.

Lanhee J. Chen is the David and Diane Steffy Fellow in American Public Policy Studies at the Hoover Institution and the director of Domestic Policy Studies in Public Policy at Stanford University.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/04/07/vote-mail-delivers-array-problems-opposing-view-editorials-and-debates/2966804001/

trump has spent 3 months saying this kind of voting is bad instead of doing something about the problem

The left should just support the banning of mail in voting in the UK to deny all the housebound tory voters under the guise of a couple of Muslim families fraudulently voting. Seems a pro strategy to follow

Sorting out the problem is responding to it moonths ago and working with his party to fund sorting the problem

Democrats in America and labour voters here don’t care about democracy nor the legitimatecy of an election
Their one aim is to win , by any means fair or fowl
And if even then they lose
They still will not accept that either , and turn to riots and violence and protests

This is what the traditional conservative voter , mild and law abiding silent and peaceful  faces today I’m afraid

It’s easy to be silent aaron , by being silent you can avoid causing the least possible harm

Aren't anti government agitators, thugs and rioters supposed to be getting beaten by the police?

Just bring all those 3 million hong kong folks here please.

I very much admire these  Hong Kong protesters ,

That is one thing , democrats and the Labour Party another

Don’t confuse one with the other

all the freedom supporting patriots on here proclaim to be pro democracy but have good words to say about all the other anti democratic governments from the outright dictatorships, authoritarians and wannabe ones and then those who seek to undermine the democratic process ehether its through legal means or legally questionable ones

Tried that once but can't help myself

The radical left and their cancelling of anyone or anything that disagrees with them.

Pathetic bunch.

Don't you ever get bored of just repeating tired narratives and buzzwords IT.

Aren't you lot supposed to be free and independent thinkers unlike the radical left?

MAGA is somehow even worse for groupthink than FBPE