Forums

North American

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
themightymac
27 Sep 12 02:49
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Apr 02
| Topic/replies: 35,029 | Blogger: themightymac's blog
I won`t be betting on it until they get the refs back. Anybody else boycotting it?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 7  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 265
By:
HARRY22
When: 27 Sep 12 06:53
So you will be betting tonight then Cool The slightly better zebras return for the baltimore game. Shocked
By:
d13phe
When: 27 Sep 12 08:37
this looks like a week where a lot of the good teams blow the spreads against a lot of the weaker teams imo
By:
HARRY22
When: 27 Sep 12 08:53
taken -1 bengals to start with
By:
db1974
When: 27 Sep 12 09:39
Browns +12.0 for me tonight anyway

Very difficult for teams to cover a double-digit spread, especially in divisional matches. Home favourites attempting to cover a spread of between 10.0 - 14.0 have a losing record ATS of 113-124-5 over the last 10 years which is roughly break-even. However if you restrict those matches to divisional match-ups, the record worsens to 39-53-1 which makes a blind bet on the Dog worth a punt every time.
By:
d13phe
When: 27 Sep 12 09:48
the Pats -4 against the bills who have Tashard Choice suited up

I like the Bengals to cover

And the Redskins to beat the Buccs
By:
HARRY22
When: 27 Sep 12 10:12
fred jackson could be suited up sunday...spiller and jackson will be a nice 1-2 punch when both fit
By:
db1974
When: 27 Sep 12 12:26
I also like

Titans +12.0 @ Texans for reasons posted above (although I am less confident about this one)

49ers -4.0 @ Jets - seems very low for a team who made a mockery of any West Coast travelling to East Coast problems last year. The 49ers are still a very good team and should have way too much for a sorry-looking Jets team. Jets are without Darrelle Revis as well

Bengals -3.0 @ Jaguars - Jags are very poor IMO.

Patriots -4.0 @ Bills - just can't see the Pats not covering this having lost the last 2.

Also tempted by Seahawks to cover the spread @ Rams and I think the Buccaneers will beat the Redskins too
By:
HARRY22
When: 27 Sep 12 12:29
I have the jags as plum last in the nfl..they are a one man band and even with him they will struggle to win a game...outside of the colts not many teams if any you would back the jaguars to beat
By:
HARRY22
When: 27 Sep 12 12:31
Like all 4 of them picks...really like the 49ers this week, I think we may see tebow as sanchez is in for a beating and with revis out for the season the jets become vulnerable in the secondary
By:
HARRY22
When: 27 Sep 12 12:38
54% passing completion 75% passing completion...with and without revis on the field Shocked
By:
d13phe
When: 27 Sep 12 13:15
yes the Jets could get murdered by the 49ers
By:
punkha1
When: 27 Sep 12 22:52
Did nobody else think the 49ers were very poor last week made Ponder look like Joe Montana though i agree the Jets are poor.
By:
d13phe
When: 28 Sep 12 09:46
I think the Vikings are underrated and putting something long term together

they have a very underrated D (especially at home) now they have key players back and fit

and Ponder was the most accurate QB going into the 49ers game so he is no mug

also AP looks better than ever - how is that possible?!!

and Harvin is  a game changer when he doesnt have migraines.

Look out for the Vikings to cause a few upsets imo, especially at home
By:
Areyoutalkintome?
When: 28 Sep 12 12:44
Jerome Simpson's return from a substance ban will also give Ponder and the Vikings offence plenty of options, he is a legit deep threat, defensive units will have trouble covering AP, Harvin and Simpson, without mentioning the emerging TE talent Kyle Rudolph.

I agree with all the comments concerning the Jets @ the 49ers. I have been against the Jets ever since their perceived, "impressive", week 1 victory. They will have trouble moving the ball against the 49ers D, there has been no evidence of a running game thus far. The 49ers should ground it out against the 28th ranked rushing defence, Daniel Thomas made gains against them last week (bitter because I had traded him away in a fantasy league) !! Gore and co should grab the attentions of a Jets secondary, without Revis (as mentioned), leaving gaps for Davis and the wide receivers corps to exploit.
By:
Areyoutalkintome?
When: 28 Sep 12 12:53
*49ers @ the Jets... sleep deprived.
By:
glory hornet
When: 28 Sep 12 19:38
Im going against most views here , but fancy all the home teams in the 6pm k/o
Really Like the Bills getting pts
Atlants at a TD or lower
Lions at 4
Jets getting 4 ( nap )
Texans smash the Titans , anything under 2 TD's is a gift
By:
d13phe
When: 28 Sep 12 21:37
Apparently now that Revis is out, Cromartie is the best CB in the NFL


according to........Cromartie

Laugh
By:
HARRY22
When: 28 Sep 12 22:11
not even top 10
By:
d13phe
When: 28 Sep 12 23:29
I think PP is my number 1 even with Revis Island

Claiborne will be up there as well
By:
SHAPESHIFTER
When: 29 Sep 12 22:19
Hi, I've got four plays posted on blogs.

I use ratings to short-list games that are value against the odds on offer.  I then narrow it down with research.

We'll see how it goes.
By:
incaseof
When: 30 Sep 12 01:45
If Mankins and Gronk are out, Pats 1-3 is quite likely Sad
By:
HARRY22
When: 30 Sep 12 10:42
patriots can adapt as good as any team...still think they will find a way to win
By:
Fallen Angel
When: 30 Sep 12 12:40
Really like Arizona this week against Miami. I actually think Tanehill has played quite well but Arizona defence have been rock solid and think the pricing for this game was all wrong. I had Arizona priced at 1/3 or 2/7 so was very surprised to see them as big as 4/9 or slightly shorter. I may well look at the spreads as thought they could give up the 5.5 points as well.
By:
HARRY22
When: 30 Sep 12 12:48
if reggie bush is limited I dont see how the fins can win this.
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 13:44
am I missing something or do the Bengals look huge at 1.9?

Jags arent in the same class.  I don't understand the price.
By:
incaseof
When: 30 Sep 12 14:09
That really is bet of the season so far, even if Jags D is underrated and capable to keep them in games. Bengals D isn't the easiest to run against even if stats wise so far they been poor
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 14:10
also struggling to understand why the Seahawks are favourite

think a big Bengals/Rams double my be the order of the day
By:
skyblues
When: 30 Sep 12 14:24
Agree on both bets, bengals my best bet off the day fancy overs aswell.
Rams ive taken in an underdog double with the bears.
Also hate to bet my own team but like the chiefs and over texans titans.
By:
incaseof
When: 30 Sep 12 14:41
well Seahawks D has been outstanding vs Cowboys and Packers...I would give them a slight edge in that match up
By:
HARRY22
When: 30 Sep 12 15:07
d13phe 30 Sep 12 13:44 Joined: 18 Jul 03 | Topic/replies: 17,894 | Blogger: d13phe's blog
am I missing something or do the Bengals look huge at 1.9?

Jags arent in the same class.  I don't understand the price.

It looks too obvious...when it looks obvious it scares me...gl fellas but I would stay clear...mo jo will have his way for my fantasy team Grin  Seahawks are going to lose today.
By:
HARRY22
When: 30 Sep 12 15:10
+12 TITANS.....falcons 49ers double evens   gl
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 15:17
i have waded in on the Bengals.  Cant be having this price at all.

Harry talking about fantasy, Forte is questionable so I have got a real dilemma.  I have Lamar Miller as backup but obv want Forte in but I risk dropping Miller and then Forte being ruled out on Monday night - tough one!

I might see if Reggie Bush is fit later.
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 15:38
bengals up to evens now Plain

is Dalton and AJ Green out?
By:
Fallen Angel
When: 30 Sep 12 16:06
@d13phe I have only just looked at this game now. I had the game priced 1.66 Bengals vs. 2.66 Jags. This now equally as wrong price as the Arizona game for me. My ELO rankings have both as decent favourites. Have you found out anything? I will be having a decent wedge on the bengals if there aren't any serious injuries.
By:
Areyoutalkintome?
When: 30 Sep 12 16:07
d13phe.

Thomas got the carries in Bush's absence last week, much to my surprise, how much exposure is Millar likely to get? Not forgetting that he is up against a tough defensive unit.
Forte's injury wasn't as bad as first feared, the bears have made noises that they would definitely have him ready by week 5, so every chance that gamesmanship is being applied by the backroom staff, he could figure on Monday evening.

From fleaflicker....

Matt Forte (ankle) is officially listed as questionable for Monday night against the Cowboys.

Forte was limited for the third straight day on Saturday but reportedly "looked good" and is expected to play. Chicago beat writers Brad Biggs and Vaughn McClure, along with teammate Michael Bush, have noted that there's a good shot that Forte suits up. We'd still like to hear a more definite answer before locking him into fantasy lineups, especially since it's a Monday night kickoff. Dallas has been dominant against the pass, but they currently rank No. 19 against the run.
That


Resistence to the Bengals is a concern, no reason has surfaced, yet?!
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 16:10
there are a few secondary injuries apparently but i think the Bengals will outscore anyway as has been the case this season so far.
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 16:11
Thanks areyoutalkingto me.

I figured Millar would be more involved as he is averaging nearly 6 yards per carry so far.

Forte obv has the better upside though
By:
Areyoutalkintome?
When: 30 Sep 12 16:20
No worries, I would also have Miller over Thomas, but then I would say that as I traded the latter away last week!
By:
d13phe
When: 30 Sep 12 16:34
Gronk playing for Pats

Fred Jackson and Spiller both playing for the Bills

interesting
Page 1 of 7  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com