|
By:
And yes he's a British middle aged caucasion, not a Labour MP or on the blob's books, so a severe sentence was probable (as I predicted).
|
|
By:
BEATING UP A PENSIONER HIS LIFE WILL BE HELL IN PRISON
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Oh dear, Cider, there you go again, creating your alternative truth.
|
|
By:
I love cockapoos, both cocker spaniels and poodles are traditionally working dogs, and cockapoos are most comfortable when they’re kept active, and yes, you can train them to be a type old fashioned gun dog. Still fluffy and friendly.
|
|
By:
lol that's right loper, the very day after we're told the southport monster was allowed to roam free as they didn't want to profile him as a black boy with a knife, and they were more concerned about his safety than his probable victims, as he was 'allegedly' autistic.
you can carry on in your own little fantasy world, where people aren't treated differently due to their immutable characteristics, if it makes you feel better. |
|
By:
I had my own row with a 'pensioner' after he allowed his dog to use my property as a toilet. Instead of being apologetic/remorseful when I pulled him up on it, he wanted a fight.
I am wise enough not to have taken him up on the offer, as prison isn't for me. I can see how someone slightly less patient might not have been so passive about it. |
|
By:
I've just seen the BBC headline and how they describe Williams:
Grand National horse trainer jailed for beating man with hockey stick https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39330rnxdko So "Grand National" and "beating man with hockey stick" in the same breath, surely just an unfortunate and unintended link there, eh? |
|
By:
No future entries the girls better hop over to Tim's for some rides.
|
|
By:
"Grand National winning trainer" not possible, but not to worry, we'll still describe him as a "Grand National trainer".
|
|
By:
the.mad.dog.man 14 Apr 26 15:51
BEATING UP A PENSIONER HIS LIFE WILL BE HELL IN PRISON Probably get a good few digs off of those who were suckered into Cappa Bleu year on year too. |
|
By:
I wonder how Williams would have responded if the 'trespasser' had been over 6 ft and built like a brick sh*thouse?
Waited for the police? |
|
By:
What happened to the two nice boys who flattened a Policewoman at Manchester Airport?
|
|
By:
Maybe Williams should have admitted it and taken 3 months.
Mi Lord does not like them telling porkies. |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
barstool 14 Apr 26 16:37
What happened to the two nice boys who flattened a Policewoman at Manchester Airport? on trial now. |
|
By:
GEORGE.B re Grand National trainer.
My guess is the BBC news intern misunderstood the term National Hunt trainer. |
|
By:
Thanks Rico.
Hope they get 3 yrs apiece too. |
|
By:
nfc
|
|
By:
18mths-2yrs
|
|
By:
Harsh imo for Evan...
|
|
By:
Two tier criminal justice system again. Labour MP attacks and beats up member of the public WHILE ON THE GROUND - walks free from court. Horse racing trainer attacks pensioner for trespassing - gets THREE YEARS. Ridiculous.
|
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
|
|
By:
All the legal experts have come out of the woodwork.
Labour MP pleaded guilty to assault Williams was found guilty of GBH with intent (an offence that carries a max sentence of Life imprisonment) He was lucky to get only 3 years. |
|
By:
JML, no case is exactly the same. Obviously.
The Labour MP was guess what, a MP. Elected to public office. He sucker punched someone and then went in for more when they were on the ground and out of it. He WAS NOT in control of whether the victim cracked his skull open on the tarmac or not. Luckily, he hadn't. The Labour MP then lied about what happened to the cops, and tried to put the blame on the victim. He was effectively let off. How can you, or anyone else, possibly justify that. Do you think a Reform MP would be let off for that. lol. Yes Williams attacked someone who was trespassing on his property. Not some random constituent on the street. Not a sucker punch. Who decides the charges ? |
|
By:
Oh that's right the CPS. Their former leader, is guess what. A Labour MP. Unfortunately for us, also nominally the prime minister.
|
|
By:
CPS decided on all charging decisions but no doubt you'll know more than them.
|
|
By:
I know that they are extremely biased and deeply political.
|
|
By:
Got what he deserved and could easily have killed the guy for which he would have received more.
Few of the ladz on 'ere just disappointed willo isn't a muslim ![]() Instead of riding out tomorrow, he'll be getting ridden by Bruce. Safeguarding issues when he gets out means he may not be put in charge of young stable staff given his violent nature. miserable looking co0nt at the best of times. manic or bi-polar tendancies. Don't let him have a belt ffs. |
|
By:
Arrogance...no way his brief advised him to plead not guilty....a couple of those years are for wasting everyone's time....plead guilty, say sorry, you were having a bad day and lost your rag and the sentence might have been in months rather than years
|
|
By:
Surprised no GOFUNDME up yet to pay for his legal fees.
|
|
By:
Agree. Own up to what you've done, like your momma taught you.
Acted like an 18th century landowner believing he could whack the living daylights out a defenceless old man and walk away from it scot free. WAC |
|
By:
I knew you would know better.
You got something right, to be fair. But, as per, usual. Rule 101 = go for the man instead of the ball. You appear to be of the ilk that claims if a process is followed, it can't be questioned. It's the clever people, innit. |
|
By:
It's uncanny how many times I have called out the 'clever' people on here, and eventually proven to be correct.
|
|
By:
This is a case that happened in west of Ireland over 20 years ago.https://www.rte.ie/news/2024/1129/1483773-mayo-farmer-who-shot-intruder-on-his-land-dies-aged-81/
|
|
By:
You got something right, to be fair. But, as per, usual. Rule 101 = go for the man instead of the ball.
If you want me to go for the ball you've got to put one in play be actually explaining WHY you're right and the CPS is wrong. I assume the CPS would have had some medical advice before charging him with manslaughter. Why don't you actually explain what you disagree with. I assume you've read this medical advice because commenting on the decision without doing so would be a rather stupid. |
|
By:
wouldn't say it was harsh or leniant, looks about right.
you'll always get people comparing the offence to other crimes and punishment.it is what it is...he was guilty of over the top violence with a weapon as an aggravating factor. |
|
By:
it certainly wasnt leniant. nothing is
leafy with his usual tripe. he wouldnt be a moslem as dogs are haram, like just about everything under the religion of peace very stoopid tendencies on display, as ever |
|
By:
joey barton next with using a golf club..could cost him a wedge.
|
|
By:
should be putter way
|