There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 560 comments are related to the topic:
Man detained after car hits pedestrians at Liverpool FC parade, police say.
Man detained after car hits pedestrians at Liverpool FC parade, police say.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 560
|
By:
Who started all this vomit inducing cruelty…..?
I remember Nice being around the first…. Copy cat stuff spewing over Europe….. Just a thought….. Although i still think this was just a screwball losing the plot…. |
|
By:
Car ‘collides’…..
Some headline…. Just watched the slo mo of the drivers door open …..something not right here tbh….. Maybe just back from holiday…. |
|
By:
Drug driving.
|
|
By:
Been charged with attempted murder
|
|
By:
Apologies, correction
Being questioned on the charge of attempted murder Plus driving under the influence of drugs |
|
By:
anybody else think cider/nanny goat/case money should be deported, vile racist scumbag, note I say scumbag not scumbags because it's same beast, c'mon bet fair get a grip and bar this racist scumbag for life.
Malay thinks Cider and myself are the same Person Get back with yer back slapping Buddies on Politics , Your mind is going Malay |
|
By:
I have had two Accounts Malay this Account I could not deposit on Due to a bank Problem Some time Ago
BF contacted me and Said I had Two Live Accounts I explained what had Happened , I asked if I could Keep the old account A new deposit method was added .. They agreed , Thats two accounts , I am Not Irishone who you accused me of Being Previously  I am not Cider , Or any other of these So called racists You See every where I have one Account , I already explained this on Politics Some time Ago .. Very strange this man keeps Imagining I am other people ,worrying TBH |
|
By:
100,s witnessed him been put on a stretcher, and bundled in to a police van, some were kicking punching him some even new him,live near him,yet the social tin foil hat brigade wont believe it,he,ll be in court in next few days do the tin foil brigade think their going to spray him white before appearing ?
|
|
By:
Send him to Siberia or Timbuktu. He's surplus to requirements here. At his age he ought to have known better. Any financial assistance from the state for getting him high on drugs? Or is he a dealer?
|
|
By:
72 Hours to Charge him ?
|
|
By:
Can wants be see the dirt decriminalised…..medicinal,soft,harder….then lead onto the proper muck…
The innocent pay the high price….. El Salvador is the new and proper way to deal with vermin…. |
|
By:
I'd advise not to feed him 3 meals a day; one is plenty enough. If wanting any more he can pay for them himself.
|
|
By:
He'll get 20 years. A lot less if it wasnt so high profile.. imo.
|
|
By:
20 mins on the kop would be a better
|
|
By:
He will be like most praying it’s a bad dream full of regret,tears and probably bed wetting…..the circus on the Thames will probably give the nod for a decade or two….
Sniff and snort you pay the price…. |
|
By:
I firmly believe a few moronic individuals should be facing a breach….things could have been different if they had let it reverse….imv
|
|
By:
Was any copper carrying a gun? If not, why not? He'd have been taken out there and then, and deal with the questions later. What good will this person be in jail? Only wasting scarce financial and other resources.
|
|
By:
do you ever stop and think before you post?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
What if the driver was having a fit or heart attack ?? Has to go down as post of the Year ... so far.
 |
|
By:
About time they named this bloke. Others peoples names and photos are apparently being posted while they are out at work etc.
|
|
By:
About time they named this bloke. Others peoples names and photos are apparently being posted while they are out at work etc.
Dangerous game to play posting names and pics on social media, as you say Howard it could easily all go wrong for an innocent person. |
|
By:
As always on here, judge and Jury and law experts without the actual facts in front of them!! Obviously failed a drug swab but that could mean a miniscule trace of cannabis or even a prescription drug, no excuse tbf but perspective that he may not have been impaired any more than an average person on painkillers.
As for attempted murder, that is ludicrous to think that would float past the CPS as a charge that gets to Court and BTW they have all the time they wish to "Charge" him, 72 hours is only for detention and can be extended. Going by the visual evidence alone he could be guilty of plenty but even if he had drugs in his system attempted murder is a stretch, did not look as if he had "intent". Looked like somebody who had taken a wrong turn and then panicked when the mob started attacking his car? That is what it looks like from the visual evidence, may be more but baying for blood based on it is way premature imvho? |
|
By:
detention is 24 hours before extension.
|
|
By:
JML the expert!! LOL
|
|
By:
After 24 hours in police custody in the UK, the police must either release you or charge you with a crime. If they haven't made a decision within 24 hours, they can only hold you for a further period with specific authorization, which depends on the severity of the suspected offense.
Never heard about channel 4 prog "24 hours in Police Custody" LOL |
|
By:
So they are handcuffed if not charging within 24 hours you are saying JML? Google has a lot to answer for!!
|
|
By:
According to gov.uk :
How long you can be held in custody The police can hold you for up to 24 hours before they have to charge you with a crime or release you. They can apply to hold you for up to 36 or 96 hours if you’re suspected of a serious crime, such as murder. You can be held without charge for up to 14 days if you’re arrested under the Terrorism Act. I would suggest that JML is therefore correct and Cagliari is the one without the actual facts to call on. |
|
By:
Read your own post again Dixie!!
|
|
By:
And BTW starring yourself makes you look stupid!! HTH
|
|
By:
Please point out what is wrong with the gov.uk wording ?
What is "starring" btw ? |
|
By:
Your second sentence should make it obvious!! I merely stated that JML seemed to think 24 hrs was the cut off to charge or release, looks like he used the same reference as you and failed to understand it?
I must have authorised a lot of extensions that were unlawful if you don't understand, 36 hours inhouse and a further 36 by a Magistrate and longer if terror related when I was DCI OIC RCS, but it might have changed, if so where? |
|
By:
Its not "my" second sentence, it was cut and paste from the gov.uk website. I fully understand the procedure as denoted. You are released or charged after 24 hours unless an extension is granted.
You can be held for up to 24 hours UNLESS you get an extension granted by an authorised person (as you have now stated) followed by further applications for more 12 hour extensions up to a max of 96 hours depending on severity of offence. Which is pretty much what JML was saying in his posts at 5.46 and 5.53 pm and you seem to have blanked out. |
|
By:
Best leave it Dixie--just let him think he's right.
|
|
By:
And you two stick to google, you never even spotted the tripwire so learn to interpret the Gov site or don't bother at all?
|
|
By:
You wearing the cape Cag ?
|
|
By:
Are they definitely certain of origin ?
Just wondering…. |
|
By:
Hardly Quixall, not long in from fishing about 20 minutes from you, two nice trout btw!!
|
|
By:
I can't argue that you're no good at fishing......
|
|
By:
How big this time?
|