Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 576 comments are related to the topic:
Punters detail their frustration with intrusive checks

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 15 of 15  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 576
By:
dustybin
When: 31 Jan 23 12:29
Yeah don’t swallow your tongue or owt I’ll be grief stricken.

Pragmatism is the least of your worries, you can’t see that there is no remit of the cross party to force bookies to take these amazing winning bets of yours and nor have they ever defined the difference between slots and gambling on horses, so the whole premise of your useless argument is as irrelevant as you.

Nor can you see that by having a low bar that acts as a catch all at some point will stop anyone other than those hell bent on losing any which way because they never went to get the help for the fundamental flaw they still have.

All enterprise ‘headbuts the line’ until the regulator stop them, bookies are no different, if the regulator failing then that’s on the regulator don’t try and pass this to everyone betting on say an exchange.
By:
The Management
When: 31 Jan 23 12:34
So long, farewell,
Auf Weidersehen, goodbye!
By:
dustybin
When: 31 Jan 23 12:37
Like the idiot who keeps promising to leave then pops his head back telling all those who dont care that he means it.
By:
dustybin
When: 31 Jan 23 12:38
Then FO TM, nobody fkin cares
By:
formoftheace
When: 31 Jan 23 12:51
He bites….
By:
ronnie rails
When: 31 Jan 23 17:30
THE SHOP HAS LOST TODAY YET ANOTHER TOP PUNTER  3 IN THE LAST 3 WEEKS,

THE GAME HAS GONE. END OF

LAST PERSON TURN THE LIGHTS OUT .THATS HOW BAD IT IS.

RONNIE.
By:
liberator of the oppressed
When: 31 Jan 23 18:47
That advert on Sky racing PUKE.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 31 Jan 23 21:51
handtorofe 23 Jan 23 19:29 
The management you are wrong i have taken a break from betfair just came back on, a long term winner paid premium charges and been harshly restricted


This looked quite an interesting post but didn't appear to get much response, so I hope handtorofe doesn't mind me asking, did they ask for proof of income and you refused (and respect to you if that's the case), or were they dissatisfied with what you sent them?

And what is the current situation, are you limited to £100 / month deposits?
By:
smirnoff2therescue
When: 01 Feb 23 00:00
im not gona read the previous 128 comments since my last post otha than to say


BetVictorv had me on a 2o mill fonecall where it transpired my mthly footfall was 5.57/5.67 in their favour

end of fonecall we agreed a 2oo a mth deposit limit despite only punting 30 a mth to get the free 5er bet

im al over the constitutin /jonbon bet but trust me this goes further cos this lot are scumbags cos they 5 mins later closed account
By:
smirnoff2therescue
When: 01 Feb 23 00:03
they you used my health as an excuse

terminal but treatment will sing a bit
By:
smirnoff2therescue
When: 01 Feb 23 00:03
they you used my health as an excuse

terminal but treatment will sing a bit
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 01 Feb 23 12:23
All the hot air and blarney wasted on here, and the effort attached to doing it, and each of you could have done the constructive thing and written to your M.P.'s. Fifteen minutes max it would have taken.
Nobody has done it so spare me ( and yourselves ) your sanctimony about this situation.
That's why we vote them in ffs so give them a flea in their ears!
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 01 Feb 23 12:30
You're behind the times with this one, LoyalHoncho, this was done months ago, with someone being kind enough to write the template.

And many of us did write to our MPs, and tbf I did get a courteous reply, but it was all highly predictable, protecting the vulnerable blah, blah, blah...
By:
racing6699
When: 01 Feb 23 12:34
if they are worried about vulnerability then they should look at the fact 90% cant heat their home due to profit greed and incompetence
By:
The Management
When: 01 Feb 23 12:44
You send them a template (that probably doesn't really say what you want it to say - because it was written by a bookmaker or somebody dependant on bookmakers) - they (or rather one of their minions) reply to you with a template because they don't understand the subject matter, let alone the detail.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 01 Feb 23 12:58
Fair enough. I didn;t use a template and I got personal replies with promises of action followed up by confirmation of same.
Did everybody, or anybody else?  If so keep doing it. Issues move on as this one now has.  Resistance and objection is gathering momentum.  Persist as you would want your jockey to on the leader you have punted.
Keep going!
By:
MJK
When: 03 Feb 23 17:33
https://www.racingpost.com/news/gambling-review/owner-who-raised-1m-with-cheltenham-song-barred-from-betting-on-racing-aT5ey6d6glYq/
Page 15 of 15  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com