|
By:
Although having wrote this once before I will rewrite it for the thickets amongst us.
If you refuse the Covid jab you waiver your rights to any COVID treatment. |
|
By:
Exactly George, all of a sudden we got experts on viruses, I just don't get why they wasting their time on this forum when they could stand on the doors of their local hospital and say 'Yes you can come in but not you tonight'
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
GLasgow- please answer my question, does that still apply to anybody what's paid their FULL 35 years!!!!!
|
|
By:
Ah, but along the same lines, the Nazis will respond with: well, serves themselves right, they shouldn't have smoked, it's their own fault
But, what if the person was unfortunate enough to have developed the malignancy through passive smoking, or through industrial disease eg mesothelioma? The know-fck-alls who think they know it all, eh? |
|
By:
Yes of course, even if you have paid in over 40 yrs like myself.
Why should I wait in a hospital for covid treatment after following all the guidelines just to see it filled with IDIOTS who refuse the jab. |
|
By:
So the Jab is your God the great break through or do you feel conned and what everyone to join the con, if the JAB was so bloody great why are a country what is 100% jabbed in lockdown IYO, because I'm thick!
|
|
By:
You may be right Glasgow because my thick immune system attacks my healthy skin cells and causes bloody chaos, no way I'm putting a vaccine what would fuel that but hey ho I shouldn't receive NHS treatment even though I've paid my full 35 years.
P.S You only have to pay 35 years, if you pay after that you've not made it thanks for the extra contribuctions. |
|
By:
Sounds like you would be medically exempt, when I say refusers I Obviously meant those without any medical conditions preventing this.
|
|
By:
And even if I was medically exempt and you knew that would you have a drink me? I guess no because the fear has worked, sad world today.
|
|
By:
To be genuinely honest with you I dont think anyone knows what it's all about. Boris jumping on a train without a mask tells you all you need to know imo.
|
|
By:
looks like there will be no lockdown in the UK..all the unvaccinated (excluding the medically exempt )anti vax cranks etc ...should THANK WHOLEHEARTEDLY the people who have made the sacrifice and been vaccinated for the greater good of society and the care homes ,nhs etc...as for all the silly ****s giving it the big un on a anonymous forum ive more time for those fkg idiots glueing themselves to the m25...
|
|
By:
Hhaha another gullible goon, lockdown by xmas 1.01
o an thanks for your heroic sacrifice ![]() |
|
By:
It would be awesome if there were any Lockdown markets on Betfair - but you'd have to think that Boris (and his cronies) were doing a "Harry Redknapp to Portsmouth" on them:
Sunday 3rd January 2021 - Boris states "All schools are 100% safe." Monday 4th January 2021 - 10 million little blighters go back to school and mingle for the day. Tuesday 5th January 2021 - All schools closed* *Any teacher will tell you that no schools were actually closed - they actually stayed open throughout for the children of key-workers and vulnerable children. |
|
By:
Genuine question here… why is this vaccine any different to the ones we have all had to prevent measles, TB, rubella, typhoid, tetanus, smallpox ( now eradicated ) . ?
|
|
By:
Has anyone seen my "I'm ashamed of my country" thread?
It appears to have been confiscated. |
|
By:
![]() Your thread has gone to room 101 where it belongs, even the slowest b/f moderator has picked upon the amount of falsehoods being spouted and Binned it. !!! Good riddance. |
|
By:
GLASGOWCALLING21 Nov 21 22:10
2/3 of all covid cases clogging up the system for the needy are un jabbed. !!!!! so they dont want the jab but they want the treatment for not having it. James @JamesfWells @UKStatsAuth this looks to be a serious breach of 'The Code of Practice for Statistics' by @ONS It appears that a particular time series has been selected to get a specific result concerning the risk for vaxxed vs. unvaxxed from covid? James @JamesfWells · 7 Nov See attached the letter I have sent to @UKStatsAuth & the National Statistician outlining the Code of Practice for Statistics breach by @ONS I am genuinely disappointed, let us hope that the remedy restores my faith in @ONS https://twitter.com/JamesfWells/status/1457428232496635907 ***************** Oh dear, the previously thought-to-be independent ONS being called out for seemingly manipulating the vaxxed vs unvaxxed data. We're living in dangerous times ![]() |
|
By:
While forcing people to do things against their will is distasteful it is sometimes necessary (ask the people who lived through the war that you lot think you won by yourselves). I've said it before but anyone that is genuinely concerned about rights to do with covid really needs to first take a look a look at what powers the gov has given itself over the last 2 years or so. Ignore your silly individual, 'my right to decide who i kill by needlessly spreading itl' nonsense but powers that actually mean something to society. You really are being 'useful idiots' and giving them cover - well done
I also suggest you stop using facebook, all social media, google maps and any other app (which is basically all of them) that not only log your every movement geographically but log all your web browsing etc. You'll need to turn off location finder but those apps (esp sat nav) are just so handy aren't they? You even give some of them full permission to listen into your conversations - some of these are even recorded esp anyone with alexa etc. Anyone that complains about rights to do with covid has obviously never had those rights infringed upon in their lives. We could almost be done with it by now but thanks to these people covid will prob never go away as much as it would have done if 80/90% had taken it first off. The US (esp some areas) is clearly doomed to have it fairly badly in perpetuity due to the established anti vax movement but we don't have to. |
|
By:
spyker 22 Nov 21 12:06
While forcing people to do things against their will is distasteful it is sometimes necessary ask the people who lived through the war that you lot think you won by yourselves). You mean like the ones who after the war came up with the Nuremberg Code, who sought to protect bodily autonomy, and tried to ensure medical procedures would never be performed on people ever again against their will? Tell you what, spyker, come back when you've grown a brain. Cheers. |
|
By:
george...you need a good shaking
|
|
By:
Why is that, portmanpark?
No waffle please, I know you struggled last time when asked, but this time try to give referenced posts. Thank you. |
|
By:
Brian look up mRNA
To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies. |
|
By:
Whether this safe long term or not you can be confident most of the public just see "vaccine " and blithely stick their arm out.
|
|
By:
.should THANK WHOLEHEARTEDLY the people who have made the sacrifice and been vaccinated
Christ, 23nights. You've queued up three times to "sacrifice" your health. In what world is that an advisable thing to do? |
|
By:
What sacrifice?
You've had the "safe" jab because you are scared of a pandemic that is 24th in the lethality stakes. Cowards. And you want to sacrifice our rights to not take drugs because you are STILL scared having taken the jab? Get back in the basement |
|
By:
That comment of 23nights' - that he'd made a "sacrifice" by getting injected - is telling. He knows he's done something that may harm him, and now he's got to live with it. The only way of rationalising that worry he's got hanging over him is to make everyone else go through it. That way he can kid himself he only did it because he had no option.
|
|
By:
its a sad day when the pro vaccine crowd has turned into the nasty b@stards, this whole thing has turned people into something else
|
|
By:
I wonder what % of adults think this "vaccine" is of the same type they received when inoculated as kids, for example?
Maybe "Dr" Spyker can answer that one? spyker 19 Nov 21 18:48 I'm as angry about it as I was as a child when I had to get those vaccines. |
|
By:
Screaming! You are spot on!!
|
|
By:
Totally agree SFBTW. The psychology of it is the problem
The abject fear that the govs and msm have instilled into the jabbed makes the jabbed desperate for the treatment to work, which is understandable. Their whole world would fall in if it is proven to be a false dawn. They've been perfectly played. |
|
By:
Not meaning to denegrate the jabbed there ^^. Scary times for us all.
|
|
By:
And the imbeciles thought we were just conspiracy theorists, LOL. The clown public also called us dumb for predicting covid passes. Sheeple will be sheeple.
|
|
By:
No.
After a few months, people injected with these vaccines are twice as likely to be carrying the virus than normal people. In everyday life this doesn't matter, since the virus is no danger to anyone in decent health. In a care home, though, who knows? |
|
By:
got anyone close in a care home screaming ?
|
|
By:
If not being injected is "selfish", as both HM The Quenn and 23nights state, then that proves that not being injected is the sensible thing to do. Not being injected must be good for you. If it weren't, it wouldn't be "selfish", would it?
|
|
By:
Have you, 23nights?
|
|
By:
did have ..
|
|
By:
have you
|
|
By:
No. Did have. Father had dementia. Years ago.
|