There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 297 comments are related to the topic:
1.01 photo smashed
1.01 photo smashed
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 297
|
By:
its the initial fuq up that exacerbates all of this. If dead heat is originally called and mirror image misalignment explained then not many complaints can be made apart from 'get your act together and make sure the mirror is aligned properly'
|
|
By:
instead we have a complete sh1t show and much disgruntlement
|
|
By:
duffy 03 Jul 21 13:32
Question that needs asking is why did the judge initially call Phoenix Star the winner....what did he base that on??? ------------------ Based on Being a Woman - if I may be so misogynous - or whatever the sodding word is - and, of course, a NON-Punter (let's just double-check) mentality EXACTLY SAME MISTAKE that daydream that daydream EMILY Jones made.... getting the Nostrils MIXED UP - and Calamity JANE Stickels did before her.  |
|
By:
not disputing it's a smokescreen duffy, if you read im actually dismissing the argument
|
|
By:
and it still leads to them being inept
|
|
By:
That's - 'Diversity and Inclusion' for you .
I hope the new WOMAN head of the BHA is happy. |
|
By:
bha are a farce, another week of premium fck ups and disasters all under their watchful eye
|
|
By:
So how do explain Dave Smith?
|
|
By:
*do you
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Wesdag 03 Jul 21 14:07
So how do explain Dave Smith? -------------------- Egotistical Bighead. |
|
By:
*NB by first reaction, I am talking purely about the photo. I've not seen the race.
|
|
By:
No bet in the race. In fact, the shenanigans that have gone on this week are enough to make any sane person question whether they'd want to be betting on horse racing full stop. correct. |
|
By:
^ Latalomne - Easy mistake to make - as has happened before with other Judges - BUT ...
They are meant to be - so called - and 'Trained' - Experts  ... Yet they do NOT - 'Do a double-take' ... THAT is UNFORGIVABLE.... BASIC bloody Human Nature - SURELY - in such a 'job'. You have done a double-take - and by your own admission - still cannot see it - so ... Don't bother with any Photo Betting .......... Even if you have exclusive access to the Print in front of you. This is one of the 'easier' ones. |
|
By:
No bet in the race. In fact, the shenanigans that have gone on this week are enough to make any sane person question whether they'd want to be betting on horse racing full stop.
correct. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ horse racing is well stuffed when in running comes to an end... who in their right mind would want to have pre-race bets on that nonsense...? when they can play on tennis / snooker / football and cricket... i know i won't be that's for sure. |
|
By:
That's a good point, onlooker. To do it once is bad enough, but to then have a second look and fk it up again is unacceptable
|
|
By:
Have people definitely got their full photo bet stakes back?
I have only got half back as if it were an in running bet and not a photo bet Is it a fact that that photo bets are being voided. |
|
By:
what do u think happens in a dead heat?
|
|
By:
I understand the market was settled as a dh & that should apply to photo bets as well imo.
|
|
By:
There are posts above saying that they have had their photo bets returned?
Obvs you lose half your loss and win half you winnings in a DH, that wasn't my point or question elise. |
|
By:
Google "horse flared nostrils", Onlooker, and you will see any number of images that, when translated into a side-on profile, would give the same appearance as that displayed in the print.
|
|
By:
they didn't have photo bets returned, they were in the process of resettling and reinstated the bets while they corrected the initial result
|
|
By:
ive got pre race, in running and photo bets and the settlement is now correct
|
|
By:
That is why I back place only even the BHA canna fook that up
 |
|
By:
bet they can
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
bookmatch - All bets have been RE-settled. - Correctly - as per both Betting and Betfair Rules
Phot0 bets - are NOT a SEPARATE Market - as, neither are Stewards Enquiries ... ALL bets are settled on the Weighed-In Result. |
|
By:
Latalomne 03 Jul 21 14:36
Google "horse flared nostrils", Onlooker, and you will see any number of images that, when translated into a side-on profile, would give the same appearance as that displayed in the print ------------- Np need to - and will not do either. They cannot - and hopefully, do NOT Pay-Out on 'Optical Illusions'... Sorry - But put your spade away |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Cheltenham photo mentioned above lol This was a classic bollok drop this was.
|
|
By:
Oh FFS - Wes
If you were up to speed - You would know that the new BHA boss - ANNEMARIE Phelps has undertaken to ... '.... include diversifying ... representation in line with recommendations set out by UK Sport to adopt a target of – and take appropriate actions to encourage – a minimum of 30% of each gender ... - and today is what you get. If you, somehow, and perhaps, want to try and twist that ideology by referencing Smith - then so be it If you are beating Apiafi's drum for him .... Then I will be responding no further to your agenda bait. |
|
By:
No agenda onlooker but mistakes happen regardless of sex or race (ps I don't believe in gender ideology).
|
|
By:
No agenda onlooker but mistakes happen regardless of sex or race (ps I don't believe in gender ideology).
well said Wes BTW , are you female   |
|
By:
Male
#SexNotGender |
|
By:
,,,,just joking wes
|
|
By:
no probs - just that I feel strongly about the issue
blokes don't become women based on how they "feel" |
|
By:
any bookies paying on both ?
|