There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 394 comments are related to the topic:
Well done Boris
Well done Boris
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 394
|
By:
Willie Shafter, sort ya BOG out, it's reeking the place out.
|
|
By:
The Whitty/Vallance "this is not a prediction....but we want to scare the sh*t out of you" 49,000 by mid March isn't looking good. I wish I had backed unders.
|
|
By:
Indeed, Ian
|
|
By:
let's investigate who exactly is on here 24 hours a day:
Willie Shafter (when he isn't banned) Posts: 38,852 Rico Flappy 1521 greeny 2093 BOGGY 161 roida 10,389 (approx) MrHunt 20,557 (approx) WarraA*unt 99,999 (approx) all his other usernames combined 555,555 (approx) Jeez, I'm barely a part-timer by comparison  |
|
By:
Macksman28 Sep 20 14:39Joined: 10 Oct 10 | Topic/replies: 26 | Blogger: Macksman's blog
0.002% of people went to the same university as George B. He studied Public Health, Logic and Mathematics and obviously had a keen interest in Anatomy judging by his advice on where we should stick our heads! Did he ever back a horse? Macksman, NO, he has been on here for 16 years, yet to post a pre race bet an anonymous forum, yet after 16 years the ego still wont let him post a pre race bet |
|
By:
Willie Shafter, sort ya BOG out, it's reeking the place out
|
|
By:
If the mods are reading this, and I know you will be monitoring this thread with an unblinking eye, check out the internet addresses of both Rico Flappy and BOG DARKING, you will find that they are the same, and by a remarkable coincidence, also the same as the banned forumite Willie Shafter.
wink, wink, nudge, nudge |
|
By:
Thats bad form George.
|
|
By:
Not something I'd normally do, Dotchinte, but as we're dealing with a repugnant forum bully, I'm happy to make an exception in this instance.
|
|
By:
And don't fret btw, Dotchnite, even if they did ban those usernames, he's got another 50 in reserve, he's like a skidmark on the forum's underpants that won't wash out.
|
|
By:
We've hit 1millions covid deaths my a.r.s.e.
Car crash \it's covid Plane crash \it's covid Drowning /it's covid Heart attack /it's covid Ect.ect.ect. Real figure is a tiny % of a million.TINY Hospitals before covid @breaking point Hospital now like ghost towns! Predictions on what's next... Higher tax, More homeless More deaths due to hospitals not treating people ,they'll call them covid related! Small businesses fooked! More bailouts but only for the top A vaccine that will cause some form of damage! Big pharma shocks soar! More evictions Higher travel costs A were all in this 2gether tax! More z listers claiming I had covid yet still foooking alive lol Higher food costs, Clean air tax Higher gas/electricity More **** electric cars! While screwing the poor along the way! Same old same old! People never learn. Fear works a charm ,always did!always will! Hoodwinked. |
|
By:
GEORGE.B 27 Sep 20 16:01
And apparently, saddo, presentations with coronary conditions well down too. There may well be excess deaths, REDROB, but that has happened before, the only difference being the governments of the day didn't think it necessary to scare the sh*t out of people, destroy jobs and businesses, and decimate civil liberties. The Office Of National Statistics( ONS), estimate some 65,000 excess deaths in Britain, compared to an average of the last 5 years. When did this magnitude ' happen before ' And if this useless Gov. had taken lockdown action just one week earlier, stopped infected people coming into Britain, and not issued instructions to hospitals to transfer their elderly patients into care homes, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved. And referring to PPI masks as ' face nappies ' sums you up. |
|
By:
306 deaths under 60
Pathetic excuse for a pandemic Social engineering at it best.FEAR. |
|
By:
Facts 30 Sep 20 04:07
The Office Of National Statistics( ONS), estimate some 65,000 excess deaths in Britain, compared to an average of the last 5 years. When did this magnitude ' happen before "ESTIMATE'? Is this like Ferguson and his pals ESTIMATING that if Sweden didn't lock down there would be 40,000 deaths in that country by May 1st? Come back when you have got the ACTUAL numbers and we'll compare them to the previous years when there have been excess deaths, and ask did it justify destroying civil liberties, businesses and jobs, and neglecting essential health services such as cancer and coronary? And if this useless Gov. had taken lockdown action just one week earlier, stopped infected people coming into Britain, and not issued instructions to hospitals to transfer their elderly patients into care homes, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved. Well we can agree that they're useless and about what happened with the care homes, but we can disagree about the effects of lockdown. Lockdown started March 23rd and hospital deaths peaked April 8th, too soon for lockdown to have had an effect. You have no evidence whatsoever that placing healthy people under house arrest saved a single life, but it will almost certainly cost plenty, eg delays in cancer services, diagnoses / treatments. And referring to PPI masks as ' face nappies ' sums you up. I refer you to the Fauci video posted previously and any number of daily briefings where we were told by the likes of Whitty that the evidence for the benefits of wearing face coverings was weak. Please post me the link to the major scientific study on face nappies that made them ALL change their minds in June. |
|
By:
FACE NAPPIES AND WHAT THE NEWSNIGHT REPORTER DISCOVERED
During a BBC interview in March, UK Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Dr Jenny Harries, outlined that mask wearing can do more harm than good. She said: “In fact you can actually trap the virus in the mask and then start breathing in.” Her fellow UK Deputy Chief Medical Officer Johnathon Van Tam went further at a Downing Street press conference on April 3 and claimed: “There is no evidence that general wearing of face masks by the public who are well affects the spread of the disease in our society.” He went on to say “In terms of the hard evidence and what the UK government recommends, we do not recommend face masks for general wearing by the public. He went on to say “In terms of the hard evidence and what the UK government recommends, we do not recommend face masks for general wearing by the public.” But the UK government has now back–tracked on this advice and has made face masks mandatory in shops in England. Why did it do this, when its own scientific advisers have repeatedly advised against such a move? The answer to this riddle appears to have been given on July 12 by Deborah Cohen, the medical correspondent of BBC Newsnight. Ms Cohen claimed that the World Health Organisation reversed its advice against wearing masks because of political lobbying. She stated on Twitter: “We had been told by various sources the WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying.” https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/opinion/letters/sammy-wilson-right -there-no-need-compulsory-masks-shops-2929727 |
|
By:
So there you have it "FACTS" (though I may start calling you "ESTIMATES"), you have become a faceless submissive not because of hard scientific evidence, but because of political lobbying.
|
|
By:
Oh, and by the way FACTS / ESTIMATES, it's PPE, not PPI, but it was a fairly good estimate, 67% correct.
|
|
By:
What is your problem George? Is it really that you don't want to wear a mask in a shop? Is it really that? Your civil liberties are at risk and screw other peoples liberties. Please don't think you are trying to save people from being deceived, they are more clever than that and probably, you won't believe this but maybe, even cleverer than you.
Every year jobs are lost, every year businesses cease trading it is not something new. If it is the right business I am sure it will survive. I wear a mask to protect other people and their loved ones. Yes, it is inconvenient in a small way but I think we may well come out of this better and stronger and with more appreciation of life itself. I don't think there is any place in society for those who think we should kill more people just because they are frail or at risk. I think we, as a society, should do everything we can to protect lives. That is what humanity is, isn't it? Caring for others. Not a lot of that coming from you George just complaining about wearing a mask. Sad. How about showing a bit of morality? A bit of compassion and a bit of hope for the future and encouragement for others? How about that? |
|
By:
Very well put brigust. Thank God that the absurd and marginalised minority views that some have on here are held by those who spend their lives on a betting website and have no relevance in real life.
|
|
By:
brigust130 Sep 20 08:58
I wear a mask to protect other people and their loved ones. Brigust1, what is your evidence that by wearing a mask you are doing what you claim? It's look like you've regurgitated the government propaganda in the adverts, but I'll await your answer with interest, and I refer you to my post made at 08:14. |
|
By:
And by the way Brigust1, once you've answered that, we'll move on to what my "problem" is, and I can onluy assume you haven't bothered reading the thread properly, because what is it about a post like this that you don't understand?
...did it justify destroying civil liberties, businesses and jobs, and neglecting essential health services such as cancer and coronary? |
|
By:
So George, earlier you implied that most of the covid deaths are people with underlying health issues who had limited life expectany anyway.
As they are amongst the biggest killers in this country I'm assuming you mean people with heart conditions and cancer sufferers. But now you are saying that people with those same conditions are being neglected by having appoointments cancelled. So covid patients with underlying health conditions are of no consequence, but after culling them you want them replaced with patients with the same health conditions, who by your admission have limited life expectancy. Perhaps you think the NHS should only treat healthy people George. |
|
By:
REDROB, please copy and paste the post where I said I wanted people "culled".
|
|
By:
ok, hanging them out to dry then, means the same thing
|
|
By:
"culled", "hanging them out to dry"
I said no such thing. But go on, copy and paste the post anyway. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
'It has estimated that 986,000 women across the UK missed their mammograms due to breast screening programmes being paused.
UK coronavirus cases soar by 7,143 in largest rise of outbreak This breaks down to almost 838,000 women in England, 78,000 in Scotland, 48,000 in Wales and 23,000 in Northern Ireland. Among these women, the charity estimates that there could be 8,600 women who are now living with undetected breast cancer.' --------------------------------- This is just one type of cancer. Does showing humanity to those who need protecting from covid mean we must show less humanity to these people? |
|
By:
So, REDROB, you accused me of wanting people "culled" and when challenged about it, you produce a post about figures given out by Cancer Research UK, and say the implication is there?
|
|
By:
No contradiction whatsoever, because I also posted this:
...did it justify destroying civil liberties, businesses and jobs, and neglecting essential health services such as cancer and coronary? And saddo's post gives an excellent example of the neglect of crucial cancer diagnosis services |
|
By:
Btw, REDROB, you talk of culling as if it were me who sent covid patients back into care homes?
Now who did that? |
|
By:
You implied that people with underlying conditions had limited life expectancy.
Then complained about people with the same conditions being unable to receive treatment. Paint it whichever way you wish George. |
|
By:
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.............
FOOK OFF TO THE POLITICS FORUM FFS AND HAVE YOUR CHILDISH LITTLE SQUABBLES OUT OF SIGHT OF THE HORSE RACING FORUM, FFS. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ................ |
|
By:
There must be another 49 threads you can read tiger, but you keep looking at this one. There's no need.
|
|
By:
You implied that people with underlying conditions had limited life expectancy.
No I did not, I asked, there is a question mark at the end of the post. But it still leads back to my main point, are the measures proportional (given excess deaths in a year do happen from time to time) and justified given the consequences on the economy and people's health, of placing people under house arrest. |
|
By:
It's quite polarised George, like any big issue. Some people think avoiding a disease altogether is worth the lives of those who already have one, and some of us will disagree.
I dropped someone off for cancer treatment this morning, she considers herself lucky to have got cancer before covid came. How awful to think that. |
|
By:
The problem is saddo, most people are only getting the government propaganda, and what an example we had of this earlier with Brigust1 repeating word for word what is said in the adverts.
My best wishes to your friend and hope her treatment goes well. |
|
By:
Ignorance is bliss George, I try not to have tv on just to avoid hearing about trannybucks and that geezer who can't close his door, never mind the covid propaganda.
|
|
By:
George - I wouldn't worry too much about what Redrob types out, he reads or hears whatever he wants it to be, just to suit his agenda, that was proved earlier. It's the way of the left "what he implied", "what he really meant was", "he was thinking this or that". The MSM do exactly the same.
The issue for me is that more people will die if everything is opened up and relaxed, and other people will die with lockdowns due to cancer treatments being missed, many other illnesses untreated, and there will be people losing businesses, homes, jobs etc and no doubt suicides will go up. The people on the left will be making a big issue of lockdowns when others are losing their lives through lack of treatment (it will start to make more headlines), and if they open things up then the left will be making big issues about people losing their lives to Covid. It really is a no win situation for the Government, and it would probably be exactly the same situation if another mob was in charge - although most on the left love to think it would be totally different. |
|
By:
It's a giant cluster f**k really MD. You knew the Germans would have to appear to do best whether they actually do or not, but most have tried to do -sometimes ridiculous- things for appearance sake for fear of their media accusing them of doing nowt.
|