|
By:
So Mr.Hunt...
are you telling me that Southwell flat fibresand is timed at 1s equalling 6 Lengths...? perhaps you should speak to the BHA about that coz they must be liars in your view. |
|
By:
https://www.britishhorseracing.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Lengths-Per-Second-Scale-Tables-2019.pdf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- oh dear Mr.Hunt... you have made a complete and utter fool of yourself yet again on here... you passed your sell-by date years ago... for the sake of your parents and children just call it a day now. |
|
By:
Mr.Hunt is so stupid he quotes me as saying things that i did NOT say...
and he even includes the name of the person who DID actually say it in the quote... stay off the Newcastle Brown Mr.|Hunt... at your age it's a cup of tea and a hob nob from now on. |
|
By:
Whats the lag @ lingfield today? Anyone used their stopwatch yet?
|
|
By:
whatever it is Mr.Hunt will just tell us it's 1.5 secs behind live and you are a fool if you don't believe him.
|
|
By:
greenteethnarrabacktroutmoy 07 Jan 21 17:19
1 sec = 6L = 15yds..you do the maffs ok then..lingfield is 5yds...thats still 15yds ysc. |
|
By:
typo..
greenteethnarrabacktroutmoy 07 Jan 21 17:19 1 sec = 6L = 15yds..you do the maffs ok then..lingfield is 5L...thats still 15yds ysc. |
|
By:
ling today blv -1.5
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
you were talking originally about SOUTHWELL Mr.Hunt...
you stated 1sec is 6 Lengths on the flat... you were / are wrong. now you have moved on to Lingfield as a deflection tactic. maybe you should get your facts spot on before calling folk names on here and making out you are above everyone else. because when you get it wrong (which you invariably do) you just make yourself look rather silly. |
|
By:
greenteethnarrabacktroutmoy08 Jan 21 13:36Joined: 04 Jun 09
ling today blv -1.5 correct mr green ![]() |
|
By:
you stated 1sec is 6 Lengths on the flat...
it is. |
|
By:
you were talking originally about SOUTHWELL Mr.Hunt...
you stated 1sec is 6 Lengths on the flat... -------------------------------------------------------- you quoted me as saying something i didn't say (IMS said it)... and now you take part of my quote and conveniently miss out the SOUTHWELL part. you need to do better than this to try and squirm your way out of making an utter fool of yourself on this thread Mr.Hunt... another go perhaps...?? |
|
By:
and anyway...
only under certain conditions is 1sec 6 Lengths on the flat. it's not a blanket measurement. you are aware of that aren't you Mr.Hunt...??? |
|
By:
Its been done to death but...
Lets take VIN DIJK as an example at Southwell yesterday...the price in the system a couple of strides before the 1 pole for me were 1.25 to back 1.35 to lay. It is gaining slowly but still remains a length down. even if 1s is 15yd and not 20yd..... I am seeing odds in the system that represent the odds of something that happens approx 1s-1.5s later on the video available to all. Then add to this the person putting the odds in the system it takes them 0.2seconds to make the bet or 200ms? Then add to this they have to negotiate the 1s mandatory BF delay? Making the delay 2.2s minimum at Southwell yesterday imo. 40 odd yards behind |
|
By:
geoff m 07 Jan 21 18:50
Think its pretty universal that 1 sec = approx 6 lengths i believe a length is approx 9 feet hence approx 18 yards per second. |
|
By:
ling blv -1.5 = 21yds.
|
|
By:
chep blv -1.5 = 19.5 yds.
|
|
By:
Very slow horses you’ve got at Lingers
|
|
By:
1sec = 5L..7.5L x 2.8..you do the maffs.
|
|
By:
Can we put Chelmsford on the list as well complete waste of time ffks
|
|
By:
when it gets to 3f out go put kettle on.
|
|
By:
Lol
|
|
By:
donc blv -1.5
|
|
By:
1.50 Hereford useless here.
|
|
By:
low latency was sketchy at hereford let alone playing on minimum.
|
|
By:
blank screen 1st at ling
anybody else? |
|
By:
ok here , on low
|
|
By:
lingfiled a disgrace here, pause pause stutter pause
|
|
By:
Thanks pablo. Was still sticky there on low latency.
Again, why bother |
|
By:
that Lingfield was terrible
|
|
By:
It's almost as if sky fixed it (2 months back) but don't bother following up with maintenance or monitoring the quality.
|
|
By:
some very confident 1.01 (pink side) wannabe backers of the winner in the photo there...
way before any freeze frame went up... amazing. |
|
By:
oh and the pausing / stuttering and spluttering was shameful.
|
|
By:
It's time lingfield was boycotted imo
Maybe the balance sheet @ BF in April, on sky a/w tracks, will shake up someone to act. |
|
By:
another multi horse head-bobber...
yet the winner is 1.01 on the pink side for over 20k as the photo opens up... some excellent judges out there... well done. |
|
By:
was obv that had deffo won..but i concur with you re the earlier one.
|
|
By:
plumpton black screen before 80% of jumps, yap, totally coincidence
|
|
By:
never flickered ear
|
|
By:
Heavy landing in these chases making the signal strength weaker here?
|