Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 2458 comments are related to the topic:
New Low Latency RTV Stream

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 62  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 62 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2,458
By:
dustybin
When: 03 Jun 20 13:06
google stopwatch
By:
jamesdean
When: 03 Jun 20 13:06
Yeah I'll take the .1 back     .3 faster, that is still a good way off the trial, way over half a second slower
We shdnt be settling for that when know they can do much better, it's no way near good enough
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:06
it's quite funny james...

if you look at the youtube video where they showed you the format of the pictures and asked for comments...

from what i can tell it is exactly the same as what they have produced since yesterday...

so instead of asking 'what do you think'...

they should have just said 'this is what you are getting like it or lump it'...

the whole thing is a farce if you ask me...

but i ain't surprised in the slightest...
By:
IN RUNNING EXPERT
When: 03 Jun 20 13:08
same as yesterday, ever so slightly (possibly 0.2 approx secs) in front of RTV via sky (W10 on Firefox) which is technically an improvement in my experience as it used to be that these RTV tracks via BLV were 0.5-1.5 behind RTV via sky. I think we're just gutted as 0.6 was floated as a likely possibility but still grateful for the effort - I love technical improvement
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:08
so dusty...

are you saying today's Kempton pics are 1 second faster than yesterdays...?

not here they ain't...

i'm sticking to the 0.1 sec improvement...

0.2 secs at a push...

nowhere near 1 sec tho...
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:10
I think we're just gutted as 0.6 was floated as a likely possibility

------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think you will find 0.4 secs was the original 'promise' IRE...
By:
jamesdean
When: 03 Jun 20 13:10
probably just put it slightly faster i.e .3 so we just fk off hibby
keeps the trackies and facetimers happy, still gives them huge advantage and hopefully, for them, shuts us up

again, absolutely no where near good enough and they know it. Get it to the speeds of the trial
By:
jamesdean
When: 03 Jun 20 13:10
sorry for double post
By:
IN RUNNING EXPERT
When: 03 Jun 20 13:12
didn't see that hibby but we're on the same page as far as estimation of the difference to RTV via SKY. Does anyone know the difference between RTV via SKY and RTV via Virgin Media please?
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:13
the youtube video where it shows you 'live' then '2020' then '2019' is quite funny james...

just shows you how ridiculous the last 2 days have been...
By:
DOUBLED
When: 03 Jun 20 13:14
HappyHibby
03 Jun 20 12:10
Joined: 18 Oct 02
| Topic/replies: 12,673 | Blogger: HappyHibby's blog

------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think you will find 0.4 secs was the original 'promise' IRE...


Without wanting to be pedantic,i dont think it was a "promise".
By:
Wesdag
When: 03 Jun 20 13:16

Jun 3, 2020 -- 1:06PM, dustybin wrote:


google stopwatch


must have great reflexes to carry out these hand times with such accuracy

By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:17
it was certainly trailed as 'we will be 0.4 secs behind live' DOUBLED...

turns out we are now about 0.2 secs faster than we were...

which by my reckoning is pathetic.
By:
john92
When: 03 Jun 20 13:23
The trial was just rubbing it in our faces before throwing us crumbs. Whether its 0.1 or 0.3 secs faster, it's crumbs.
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:26
absolutely spot on john...
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:27
it was certainly trailed as 'we will be 0.4 secs behind live' DOUBLED..

they never said 0.4 behind live. between 0.6 - 1 second , probably 0.7

this is only the second day of the "new" stream, might be a few things to iron out
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:28
you are incorrect pablo.
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:29
'0.4 secs behind live' was the revelation...
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:30
post it where they said this please HH
By:
duffy
When: 03 Jun 20 13:32
Whichever way you cut it, it's improved from yesterday, there's nothing to say that this is where it stops, so let's see where it ends up in a week or so.
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:32
not got a clue pablo...

do you think i take a note of every single thing that is said on here...?

i distinctly recall 0.4 secs was the claim...

look at the youtube video...

looks like 0.4 secs to me...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwDvXwfyMsw&feature=youtu.be
By:
dustybin
When: 03 Jun 20 13:33
Hibby
No I was saying the clock was around 1s by eye, and its now around 2s by eye
perhaps over 1s yesterday and now under 2s today

Wesdag
Got to be sharp in this game
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:34
will keep an eye on it during this race dusty...
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:34
HH , 0.6 was the claim by users on here
By:
jamesdean
When: 03 Jun 20 13:35
well we've got 1.6, whats a second between mates Laugh
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:35
ok pablo...

i just made up the 0.4 second claim...

you win.

well done.
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:38
RTV clock on BLV is approx 2 secs faster than the one on ch426...

i agree dusty...

so i think that is 1 second more than it was yesterday...

but the pics are approx 0.3 secs at a push faster...

all very weird imv...
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:39
oh and my BLV paused on that Kempton race just as they reached the home straight...

pure coincidence again i think...
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:40
no need to be like that HH

if i'm wrong no problem .

can someone confirm how far behind everyone thought the faster stream was behind live

thanks
By:
Wesdag
When: 03 Jun 20 13:40
clear your cookies etc
By:
mind your own B
When: 03 Jun 20 13:42
Well its quicker than yesterday lets see what happens over the next few days keep at them Bootman.
By:
jamesdean
When: 03 Jun 20 13:44
yes, going in the right direction. Another .6 faster and they will have it to the speeds they said they would
By:
loper
When: 03 Jun 20 13:45
Considering that RTV HD pics are different gravy from BLV pic quality, 0.3 between the two is not worth it, imho.
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:45
Another .6 faster and they will have it to the speeds they said they would

which is what ?
By:
Willie Shafter.
When: 03 Jun 20 13:47
can someone confirm how far behind everyone thought the faster stream was behind live

during the trial it was close to ft..so -.4 imo.
By:
thebootman
When: 03 Jun 20 13:47
Personally I get that as fast as the old Flash live video player, when we changed the setting to 0, probably around 0.5 seconds behind the trial speed.
By:
jamesdean
When: 03 Jun 20 13:47
.5 to .6 pablo as was the speeds during the test/trial
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:49
during the trial it was close to ft..so -.4 imo.

apologies HH , you are correct .

thanks willie, i thought it was agreed that the pics were 0.6 behind live
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 03 Jun 20 13:50
thanks JD

so , did the forum suggest the speeds were 0.6 , but RUK said they would be as fast as 0.4 ?
By:
HappyHibby
When: 03 Jun 20 13:50
thebootmn...

when are we getting to the 0.4 or 0.6 secs behind 'live' that we were promised and was clearly visible in that youtube video...?

you are not to blame personally but you are the one who is speaking to the people that count...

can you give us some sort of idea why this is so hard to achieve please...???
Page 5 of 62  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 62 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com